Effects of Non-Aspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shin-Joe Yeh, Sung-Chun Tang, Li-Kai Tsai, Jiann-Shing Jeng
{"title":"Effects of Non-Aspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.","authors":"Shin-Joe Yeh, Sung-Chun Tang, Li-Kai Tsai, Jiann-Shing Jeng","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, promoting functional recovery from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by reducing inflammation-mediated perihematomal edema in rat models, the evidence of its effects on patient outcomes remains limited. As nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alleviate inflammation by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2, this study aimed to assess the impact of non-aspirin NSAIDs on ICH outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute ICH admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively categorized based on pre- or post-ICH use of non-aspirin NSAIDs. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months, survival at 1 year, and mortality at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 976 patients with acute ICH, 2.0% and 15.0% were non-aspirin NSAID users before and after ICH, respectively. Post-ICH non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with a reduced 1-year mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, p = 0.001) and long-term mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, p = 0.043), but not good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) (aOR 0.98, p = 0.940). In the subgroup analyses, post-ICH use might be linked to good functional outcomes in patients with lobar hemorrhage or in those without surgical intervention. Pre-ICH non-aspirin NSAID use was not associated with these outcomes in the overall population, but it might be linked to increased mortality in subgroups with lobar hemorrhage, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, hyperlipidemia, or without intraventricular hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The post-ICH use of non-aspirin NSAIDs reduced mortality. Future studies are warranted to identify specific non-aspirin NSAID regimens that can significantly improve the outcomes of patients with ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, promoting functional recovery from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by reducing inflammation-mediated perihematomal edema in rat models, the evidence of its effects on patient outcomes remains limited. As nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alleviate inflammation by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2, this study aimed to assess the impact of non-aspirin NSAIDs on ICH outcomes.

Methods: Patients with acute ICH admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively categorized based on pre- or post-ICH use of non-aspirin NSAIDs. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months, survival at 1 year, and mortality at long-term follow-up.

Results: Among 976 patients with acute ICH, 2.0% and 15.0% were non-aspirin NSAID users before and after ICH, respectively. Post-ICH non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with a reduced 1-year mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, p = 0.001) and long-term mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, p = 0.043), but not good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) (aOR 0.98, p = 0.940). In the subgroup analyses, post-ICH use might be linked to good functional outcomes in patients with lobar hemorrhage or in those without surgical intervention. Pre-ICH non-aspirin NSAID use was not associated with these outcomes in the overall population, but it might be linked to increased mortality in subgroups with lobar hemorrhage, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, hyperlipidemia, or without intraventricular hemorrhage.

Interpretation: The post-ICH use of non-aspirin NSAIDs reduced mortality. Future studies are warranted to identify specific non-aspirin NSAID regimens that can significantly improve the outcomes of patients with ICH.

非阿司匹林非甾体类抗炎药对急性脑出血的影响。
目的:尽管环氧化酶-2抑制剂塞来昔布在大鼠脑出血(ICH)模型中通过减少炎症介导的血肿周围水肿促进功能恢复,但其对患者预后的影响证据仍然有限。由于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通过抑制环氧化酶-2来减轻炎症,本研究旨在评估非阿司匹林类非甾体抗炎药对脑出血结局的影响。方法:前瞻性纳入2015年1月至2020年12月住院的急性脑出血患者,并根据脑出血前后非阿司匹林类非甾体抗炎药的使用情况进行回顾性分类。3个月时采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、1年生存率和长期随访死亡率评估结果。结果:976例急性脑出血患者中,脑出血前后非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药使用者分别为2.0%和15.0%。脑出血后非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药的使用与降低1年死亡风险(调整风险比[aOR] 0.30, p = 0.001)和降低长期死亡风险(调整风险比0.56,p = 0.043)相关,但与良好的功能结局(mRS 0-2)相关(aOR 0.98, p = 0.940)。在亚组分析中,脑出血后使用可能与脑叶出血患者或未经手术干预的患者的良好功能预后有关。ich前非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药的使用与总体人群的这些结果无关,但可能与大叶出血、脑淀粉样血管病、高脂血症或无脑室内出血的亚组死亡率增加有关。结论:脑出血后使用非阿司匹林类非甾体抗炎药降低了死亡率。未来的研究有必要确定特异性非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药方案,以显着改善脑出血患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信