The new age of periviability.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Amythis Soltani, Anne R Waldrop, Andrea Henkel
{"title":"The new age of periviability.","authors":"Amythis Soltani, Anne R Waldrop, Andrea Henkel","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review focuses on the clinical and ethical complexities of managing pregnancies between 20 and 25 weeks and 6 days of gestation, known as periviability, where fetal survival is uncertain and viability cannot be uniformly defined.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature highlights that outcomes during periviability depend on a constellation of factors, including gestational age, fetal weight, institutional resources, and access to neonatal intensive care. Advances in neonatal and obstetric care have pushed the threshold of viability earlier, but survival and morbidity remain highly variable. The diagnosis of life-limiting fetal anomalies or severe maternal complications during this time frequently necessitates urgent decision-making around abortion. Legal changes post-Dobbs have further complicated access to abortion care. Additionally, new recommendations surrounding feticidal injection are highlighted. Studies also emphasize that parental decisions are guided more by intuitive beliefs than by statistics alone, underscoring the importance of values-based counseling.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Periviability challenges clinicians to balance medical, legal, and ethical considerations while supporting patients through highly individualized, time-sensitive decisions. A shared decision-making model grounded in ethical principles is essential. Ongoing dialogue and refined, patient-centered guidelines are needed to ensure compassionate, equitable, and evidence-based care at the threshold of viability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review focuses on the clinical and ethical complexities of managing pregnancies between 20 and 25 weeks and 6 days of gestation, known as periviability, where fetal survival is uncertain and viability cannot be uniformly defined.

Recent findings: Recent literature highlights that outcomes during periviability depend on a constellation of factors, including gestational age, fetal weight, institutional resources, and access to neonatal intensive care. Advances in neonatal and obstetric care have pushed the threshold of viability earlier, but survival and morbidity remain highly variable. The diagnosis of life-limiting fetal anomalies or severe maternal complications during this time frequently necessitates urgent decision-making around abortion. Legal changes post-Dobbs have further complicated access to abortion care. Additionally, new recommendations surrounding feticidal injection are highlighted. Studies also emphasize that parental decisions are guided more by intuitive beliefs than by statistics alone, underscoring the importance of values-based counseling.

Summary: Periviability challenges clinicians to balance medical, legal, and ethical considerations while supporting patients through highly individualized, time-sensitive decisions. A shared decision-making model grounded in ethical principles is essential. Ongoing dialogue and refined, patient-centered guidelines are needed to ensure compassionate, equitable, and evidence-based care at the threshold of viability.

新的生存时代。
综述目的:本综述的重点是处理妊娠20 - 25周6天的临床和伦理复杂性,称为围生期,胎儿存活不确定,生存能力不能统一定义。最近的发现:最近的文献强调,围生期的结果取决于一系列因素,包括胎龄、胎儿体重、机构资源和获得新生儿重症监护。新生儿和产科护理的进步将生存能力的门槛提前了,但存活率和发病率仍然高度可变。在此期间,诊断出限制生命的胎儿异常或严重的产妇并发症往往需要围绕堕胎做出紧急决策。多布斯事件后的法律变化使堕胎护理的获取更加复杂。此外,还强调了关于注射杀胎的新建议。研究还强调,父母的决定更多地受到直觉信念的指导,而不仅仅是统计数据,这强调了基于价值观的咨询的重要性。摘要:临近生存期挑战临床医生平衡医疗,法律和伦理方面的考虑,同时支持患者通过高度个性化,时间敏感的决定。基于道德原则的共同决策模式至关重要。需要持续的对话和完善的、以患者为中心的指南,以确保在生存能力的门槛上提供富有同情心、公平和循证的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信