5-year longitudinal follow-up of patients treated for chronic mechanical low back pain using restorative neurostimulation.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Simon Thomson, Adam Williams, Girish Vajramani, Manohar Sharma, Sarah Love-Jones, Rajiv Chawla, Sam Eldabe
{"title":"5-year longitudinal follow-up of patients treated for chronic mechanical low back pain using restorative neurostimulation.","authors":"Simon Thomson, Adam Williams, Girish Vajramani, Manohar Sharma, Sarah Love-Jones, Rajiv Chawla, Sam Eldabe","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic mechanical low back pain (CLBP) often stems from dysfunction of the multifidus muscle, leading to impaired motor control and pain. Restorative neurostimulation has emerged as a novel treatment targeting this dysfunction by delivering electrical stimulation to the medial branches of the L2 dorsal rami to restore multifidus activation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, open-label, postmarket clinical follow-up study aimed to evaluate 5-year clinical outcomes and device utilization trends in a cohort of 42 patients with CLBP treated across five UK sites with restorative neurostimulation via an implanted ReActiv8 neurostimulation system. Patients were followed for 5 years, with assessments of pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), and health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)) at baseline and regular intervals. Therapy utilization was collected via implantable device logs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 5 years, 34/42 patients (81%) completed follow-up. Significant and durable improvements were observed in pain (mean NRS reduced from 7.0 to 3.2), disability (mean ODI reduced from 46.6 to 26.1), and quality of life (EQ-5D index increased from 0.426 to 0.703). A total of 82% of patients achieved a minimally clinically important change in either pain or disability, and 62% were pain remitters (NRS ≤3). Device usage averaged 1106 hours over 5 years, with reductions in usage over time. Lower usage was associated with non-response, though causality could not be determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restorative neurostimulation provides robust, sustained improvements in pain, function, and quality of life in patients with CLBP associated with multifidus dysfunction. These results support its long-term efficacy and safety in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01985230.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic mechanical low back pain (CLBP) often stems from dysfunction of the multifidus muscle, leading to impaired motor control and pain. Restorative neurostimulation has emerged as a novel treatment targeting this dysfunction by delivering electrical stimulation to the medial branches of the L2 dorsal rami to restore multifidus activation.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, postmarket clinical follow-up study aimed to evaluate 5-year clinical outcomes and device utilization trends in a cohort of 42 patients with CLBP treated across five UK sites with restorative neurostimulation via an implanted ReActiv8 neurostimulation system. Patients were followed for 5 years, with assessments of pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), and health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)) at baseline and regular intervals. Therapy utilization was collected via implantable device logs.

Results: At 5 years, 34/42 patients (81%) completed follow-up. Significant and durable improvements were observed in pain (mean NRS reduced from 7.0 to 3.2), disability (mean ODI reduced from 46.6 to 26.1), and quality of life (EQ-5D index increased from 0.426 to 0.703). A total of 82% of patients achieved a minimally clinically important change in either pain or disability, and 62% were pain remitters (NRS ≤3). Device usage averaged 1106 hours over 5 years, with reductions in usage over time. Lower usage was associated with non-response, though causality could not be determined.

Conclusions: Restorative neurostimulation provides robust, sustained improvements in pain, function, and quality of life in patients with CLBP associated with multifidus dysfunction. These results support its long-term efficacy and safety in real-world clinical practice.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01985230.

采用恢复性神经刺激治疗慢性机械性腰痛患者的5年纵向随访。
背景:慢性机械性腰痛(CLBP)通常源于多裂肌功能障碍,导致运动控制受损和疼痛。恢复性神经刺激作为一种针对这种功能障碍的新治疗方法已经出现,它通过电刺激L2背支的内侧分支来恢复多裂肌的激活。方法:这项前瞻性、开放标签、上市后临床随访研究旨在评估英国5个地区42例CLBP患者的5年临床结果和设备使用趋势,这些患者通过植入的ReActiv8神经刺激系统接受恢复性神经刺激治疗。患者随访5年,在基线和定期间隔评估疼痛(数值评定量表(NRS))、残疾(Oswestry残疾指数(ODI))和健康相关生活质量(EuroQol-5维度,5水平(EQ-5D-5L))。通过植入设备日志收集治疗使用情况。结果:5年时,34/42例患者(81%)完成随访。在疼痛(平均NRS从7.0降低到3.2)、残疾(平均ODI从46.6降低到26.1)和生活质量(EQ-5D指数从0.426提高到0.703)方面观察到显著和持久的改善。共有82%的患者在疼痛或残疾方面实现了临床上最低程度的重要改变,62%的患者疼痛缓解(NRS≤3)。在5年的时间里,手机的平均使用时间为1106小时,随着时间的推移,使用时间会减少。较低的使用率与无反应相关,尽管因果关系无法确定。结论:恢复性神经刺激对伴有多裂肌功能障碍的CLBP患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量提供了强有力的、持续的改善。这些结果支持其在现实世界临床实践中的长期有效性和安全性。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01985230。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信