Clinicians Who Practice Primarily in Nursing Homes and the Quality of Care for Residents With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hyunkyung Yun, Mark Aaron Unruh, Yuting Qian, Yongkang Zhang, Hye-Young Jung
{"title":"Clinicians Who Practice Primarily in Nursing Homes and the Quality of Care for Residents With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.","authors":"Hyunkyung Yun, Mark Aaron Unruh, Yuting Qian, Yongkang Zhang, Hye-Young Jung","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The number of physicians and advanced practitioners (APs) whose care is concentrated in nursing homes (often referred to as nursing home or skilled nursing facility specialists [SNFists]) has increased rapidly. Therefore, whether these clinicians provide better care is important.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between SNFist care and outcomes of long-stay nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study of 417 378 residents with ADRD in US NHs, claims for a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed. Adjusted estimates were based on a machine learning approach that incorporated a doubly robust procedure using a generalized estimating equation with inverse probability treatment weighting. Three secondary analyses were conducted: (1) stratified analyses for physicians and APs, (2) inclusion of physicians of any specialty and APs, and (3) use of proxy outcomes for in-place deaths. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2024, to May 3, 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Receipt of care from a SNFist; SNFists included generalist physicians and APs.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care-sensitive (ACS) conditions. Death without an ACS hospitalization and death without any hospitalization were used in secondary analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 417 378 residents, 242 540 received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 83.5 [8.7] years), and 174 838 never received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 84.8 [8.5] years). Compared with the residents who never received care from SNFists, the residents who received care from SNFists were more likely to be Black (12.6% vs 9.4%; P < .001), dually eligible (77.5% vs 73.1%; P < .001), and have more chronic conditions (eg, anemia, 60.9% vs 57.6%). Compared with non-SNFist clinicians, the SNFist clinicians were more likely to be female (physicians, 37.1% vs 23.3%; APs, 88.1% vs 85.1%), practice at more facilities (mean [SD] number of facilities, 9.4 [8.7] for SNFist physicians vs 6.4 [6.1] for non-SNFist physicians; 8.6 [8.1] for SNFist APs vs 7.1 [6.8] for non-SNFist APs), and less likely to practice in rural areas (physicians, 9.3% vs 25.4%; APs, 8.1% vs 20.2%). In adjusted analyses, receiving care from a SNFist vs non-SNFist was associated with 7% lower odds of an ACS hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96) and 7% lower odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96). In stratified analyses, receiving care from a SNFist physician vs a non-SNFist physician was associated with 13% lower odds (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90) of an ACS hospitalization and 7% lowers odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.88-0.97); comparisons of SNFist APs vs non-SNFist APs were not statistically significant. Estimates from the analysis including physicians of any specialty and APs were consistent with the primary results. SNFist care was associated with increased odds of in-place death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Findings of this cohort study suggest that the use of SNFists by NHs may enhance the quality of care for residents with ADRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 8","pages":"e252465"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The number of physicians and advanced practitioners (APs) whose care is concentrated in nursing homes (often referred to as nursing home or skilled nursing facility specialists [SNFists]) has increased rapidly. Therefore, whether these clinicians provide better care is important.

Objective: To examine the association between SNFist care and outcomes of long-stay nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD).

Design, setting, and participants: In this retrospective cohort study of 417 378 residents with ADRD in US NHs, claims for a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed. Adjusted estimates were based on a machine learning approach that incorporated a doubly robust procedure using a generalized estimating equation with inverse probability treatment weighting. Three secondary analyses were conducted: (1) stratified analyses for physicians and APs, (2) inclusion of physicians of any specialty and APs, and (3) use of proxy outcomes for in-place deaths. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2024, to May 3, 2025.

Intervention: Receipt of care from a SNFist; SNFists included generalist physicians and APs.

Main outcomes and measures: Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care-sensitive (ACS) conditions. Death without an ACS hospitalization and death without any hospitalization were used in secondary analyses.

Results: Of the total 417 378 residents, 242 540 received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 83.5 [8.7] years), and 174 838 never received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 84.8 [8.5] years). Compared with the residents who never received care from SNFists, the residents who received care from SNFists were more likely to be Black (12.6% vs 9.4%; P < .001), dually eligible (77.5% vs 73.1%; P < .001), and have more chronic conditions (eg, anemia, 60.9% vs 57.6%). Compared with non-SNFist clinicians, the SNFist clinicians were more likely to be female (physicians, 37.1% vs 23.3%; APs, 88.1% vs 85.1%), practice at more facilities (mean [SD] number of facilities, 9.4 [8.7] for SNFist physicians vs 6.4 [6.1] for non-SNFist physicians; 8.6 [8.1] for SNFist APs vs 7.1 [6.8] for non-SNFist APs), and less likely to practice in rural areas (physicians, 9.3% vs 25.4%; APs, 8.1% vs 20.2%). In adjusted analyses, receiving care from a SNFist vs non-SNFist was associated with 7% lower odds of an ACS hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96) and 7% lower odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96). In stratified analyses, receiving care from a SNFist physician vs a non-SNFist physician was associated with 13% lower odds (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90) of an ACS hospitalization and 7% lowers odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.88-0.97); comparisons of SNFist APs vs non-SNFist APs were not statistically significant. Estimates from the analysis including physicians of any specialty and APs were consistent with the primary results. SNFist care was associated with increased odds of in-place death.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that the use of SNFists by NHs may enhance the quality of care for residents with ADRD.

主要在养老院实践的临床医生和阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者的护理质量。
重要性:集中在养老院(通常被称为养老院或熟练护理机构专家[SNFists])提供护理的医生和高级从业人员(ap)的数量迅速增加。因此,这些临床医生是否提供更好的护理是很重要的。目的:探讨snfirst护理与老年痴呆(ADRD)患者预后的关系。设计、环境和参与者:在这项针对417 378名美国NHs ADRD患者的回顾性队列研究中,分析了2013年至2019年20%的全国医疗保险按服务收费受益人样本的索赔。调整后的估计基于机器学习方法,该方法使用具有逆概率处理权重的广义估计方程结合了双重鲁棒过程。进行了三个次要分析:(1)对医生和助理医生进行分层分析,(2)纳入任何专业的医生和助理医生,以及(3)使用替代结果进行现场死亡。数据分析时间为2024年6月1日至2025年5月3日。干预:接受SNFist的护理;snists包括全科医生和ap。主要结局和措施:住院和急诊部(ED)访问门诊护理敏感(ACS)条件。二级分析采用无ACS住院的死亡和无任何住院的死亡。结果:在417 378名居民中,242 540人接受了SNFists的护理(平均[SD]年龄83.5[8.7]岁),174 838人从未接受过SNFists的护理(平均[SD]年龄84.8[8.5]岁)。与从未接受过sn拳头护理的居民相比,接受过sn拳头护理的居民更有可能是黑人(12.6% vs 9.4%;结论和相关性:这项队列研究的结果表明,NHs使用SNFists可以提高ADRD患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信