Aaron Penciner, Rachael Iseman, Hassan Sheikh, Kolan Gilmour, Scott Odorizzi
{"title":"Evaluating the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale as a Predictor of Emergency Nursing Workloads in an Emergency Department Ambulatory Care Setting.","authors":"Aaron Penciner, Rachael Iseman, Hassan Sheikh, Kolan Gilmour, Scott Odorizzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency departments face unpredictable workloads owing to diverse patient presentations, often leading to crowding and increased waiting times. Current staffing models in Canadian emergency departments lack evidence-based methods to predict emergency nursing needs, potentially affecting patient safety and outcomes. Other triage systems, such as the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System, have been shown to have some predictive impact on emergency nursing workload. This study explores the relationship between patient acuity, as determined by the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale, and emergency nursing workload in an ambulatory care area of an emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational time-motion study was conducted in the ambulatory care area of a tertiary care academic emergency department. Research assistants used a custom application to observe emergency nurses and track patient presentations and the time emergency nurses spent on predefined tasks related to patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 shifts, encompassing 557 patient encounters and 719 patient-care tasks, were analyzed. Emergency nurses spent approximately 80% of their shift on patient-care activities and 20% on breaks. Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and time spent on \"Orders - Investigations\" tasks. However, there was a mild yet significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and \"Orders - Treatments\" tasks (r = 0.17; P = .003) and care coordination (r = 0.21; P = .005), indicating that higher-acuity patients required more emergency nursing time for treatments and care coordination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale triage level is a weak predictor of emergency nursing workload in an emergency department ambulatory care setting. Further research is required to fully understand the relationship between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and emergency nursing workload in emergency department ambulatory and nonambulatory settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency departments face unpredictable workloads owing to diverse patient presentations, often leading to crowding and increased waiting times. Current staffing models in Canadian emergency departments lack evidence-based methods to predict emergency nursing needs, potentially affecting patient safety and outcomes. Other triage systems, such as the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System, have been shown to have some predictive impact on emergency nursing workload. This study explores the relationship between patient acuity, as determined by the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale, and emergency nursing workload in an ambulatory care area of an emergency department.
Methods: A prospective observational time-motion study was conducted in the ambulatory care area of a tertiary care academic emergency department. Research assistants used a custom application to observe emergency nurses and track patient presentations and the time emergency nurses spent on predefined tasks related to patient care.
Results: Data from 40 shifts, encompassing 557 patient encounters and 719 patient-care tasks, were analyzed. Emergency nurses spent approximately 80% of their shift on patient-care activities and 20% on breaks. Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and time spent on "Orders - Investigations" tasks. However, there was a mild yet significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and "Orders - Treatments" tasks (r = 0.17; P = .003) and care coordination (r = 0.21; P = .005), indicating that higher-acuity patients required more emergency nursing time for treatments and care coordination.
Discussion: The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale triage level is a weak predictor of emergency nursing workload in an emergency department ambulatory care setting. Further research is required to fully understand the relationship between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and emergency nursing workload in emergency department ambulatory and nonambulatory settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.