Association Between Glasgow Coma Scale Trajectory and In-Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury in the ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yangchun Zhang, Feng Chen, Na Ma, Cairong Liu, Xufeng Chen, Xueli Ji
{"title":"Association Between Glasgow Coma Scale Trajectory and In-Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury in the ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yangchun Zhang, Feng Chen, Na Ma, Cairong Liu, Xufeng Chen, Xueli Ji","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is fundamental for neurological assessment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Traditional single-point GCS measurements fail to capture the dynamic nature of brain injury progression, limiting nurses' ability to identify at-risk patients and implement timely interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the dynamic trajectories of the GCS during the first 24 h in ICU and their association with in-hospital mortality in adult TBI patients, providing evidence for nursing neurological assessment and care planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five distinct GCS trajectory groups were identified: stable low level (G1, 3-8 points), stable intermediate level (G2, 9-12 points), stable medium-high level (G3, around 13 points), stable high level (G4, close to 15 points) and increasing (G5, from medium to medium-high level). Compared to G1, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced in all other groups (G2-G5). Significant interactions were found between GCS trajectories and both age and heart failure status (all interaction p < 0.05), indicating these factors modified the relationship between GCS patterns and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic GCS trajectory analysis provides superior prognostic information compared to static assessments. Age and heart failure significantly modify the relationship between GCS patterns and mortality outcomes, requiring careful consideration in nursing assessment of TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>These findings enable nurses to recognise neurological evolution patterns rather than relying on isolated measurements. Trajectory analysis helps identify high-risk patients requiring vigilant monitoring and those showing improvement patterns suitable for rehabilitation consideration. Particularly in elderly and heart failure patients, GCS trajectories should be interpreted with caution, as similar patterns may have different prognostic implications. Incorporating trajectory pattern recognition enhances care planning, resource allocation and team communication across shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is fundamental for neurological assessment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Traditional single-point GCS measurements fail to capture the dynamic nature of brain injury progression, limiting nurses' ability to identify at-risk patients and implement timely interventions.

Aims: To investigate the dynamic trajectories of the GCS during the first 24 h in ICU and their association with in-hospital mortality in adult TBI patients, providing evidence for nursing neurological assessment and care planning.

Results: Five distinct GCS trajectory groups were identified: stable low level (G1, 3-8 points), stable intermediate level (G2, 9-12 points), stable medium-high level (G3, around 13 points), stable high level (G4, close to 15 points) and increasing (G5, from medium to medium-high level). Compared to G1, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced in all other groups (G2-G5). Significant interactions were found between GCS trajectories and both age and heart failure status (all interaction p < 0.05), indicating these factors modified the relationship between GCS patterns and mortality.

Conclusion: Dynamic GCS trajectory analysis provides superior prognostic information compared to static assessments. Age and heart failure significantly modify the relationship between GCS patterns and mortality outcomes, requiring careful consideration in nursing assessment of TBI patients.

Relevance to clinical practice: These findings enable nurses to recognise neurological evolution patterns rather than relying on isolated measurements. Trajectory analysis helps identify high-risk patients requiring vigilant monitoring and those showing improvement patterns suitable for rehabilitation consideration. Particularly in elderly and heart failure patients, GCS trajectories should be interpreted with caution, as similar patterns may have different prognostic implications. Incorporating trajectory pattern recognition enhances care planning, resource allocation and team communication across shifts.

格拉斯哥昏迷量表轨迹与ICU创伤性脑损伤住院死亡率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者神经系统评估的基础。传统的单点GCS测量无法捕捉脑损伤进展的动态特性,限制了护士识别高危患者并及时实施干预的能力。目的:探讨成人TBI患者在ICU前24 h GCS的动态变化轨迹及其与住院死亡率的关系,为护理神经学评估和护理计划提供依据。结果:GCS轨迹分为稳定低水平(G1, 3-8分)、稳定中等水平(G2, 9-12分)、稳定中高水平(G3, 13分左右)、稳定高水平(G4,接近15分)和递增(G5,从中到中高水平)5组。与G1组相比,所有其他组的住院死亡率均显著降低(G2-G5)。GCS轨迹与年龄和心力衰竭状态之间存在显著的相互作用(所有相互作用)。结论:动态GCS轨迹分析比静态评估提供了更好的预后信息。年龄和心力衰竭显著改变GCS模式与死亡结果之间的关系,需要在TBI患者的护理评估中仔细考虑。与临床实践的相关性:这些发现使护士能够识别神经进化模式,而不是依赖于孤立的测量。轨迹分析有助于识别需要警惕监测的高危患者和那些表现出适合康复考虑的改善模式的患者。特别是在老年人和心力衰竭患者中,GCS轨迹应谨慎解释,因为相似的模式可能具有不同的预后含义。结合轨迹模式识别可以提高护理计划、资源分配和跨班次的团队沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信