Validity and Reliability of the New Innovation Culture Scale© for Use in Healthcare Settings.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Susan O'Hara, Andreanna Pavan Hsieh, Nathan P Helsabeck, Karen K Giuliano, Cidalia Vital
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the New Innovation Culture Scale© for Use in Healthcare Settings.","authors":"Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Susan O'Hara, Andreanna Pavan Hsieh, Nathan P Helsabeck, Karen K Giuliano, Cidalia Vital","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the psychometric properties of the new 10-item Innovation Culture Scale©.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>American healthcare is expensive with poor health outcomes as the norm. Nurses can disrupt this paradigm through innovation; however, innovation cannot flourish without a supportive organizational culture. There is a lack of scales to measure innovation culture within healthcare settings, thus supporting improvements in quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Northeastern health system provided a convenience sample of 5658 nurses, physicians, and allied health professionals. Scale responses were obtained digitally. Item correlations, scree plot, and confirmatory factory analysis examined the scale's internal structure and assessed model fit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred sixteen participants completed the scale. Item correlations were positive and significant (P < 0.001). Scree plot confirmed a single factor structure. Several indices supported an acceptable model fit (comparative fit index = 0.935, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.916, standardized root mean square residual = 0.05), although root mean square error of approximation (0.119) was poor. Cronbach's α was 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Innovation Culture Scale is a valid and reliable measure to assess innovation culture in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of the new 10-item Innovation Culture Scale©.

Background: American healthcare is expensive with poor health outcomes as the norm. Nurses can disrupt this paradigm through innovation; however, innovation cannot flourish without a supportive organizational culture. There is a lack of scales to measure innovation culture within healthcare settings, thus supporting improvements in quality of care.

Methods: A Northeastern health system provided a convenience sample of 5658 nurses, physicians, and allied health professionals. Scale responses were obtained digitally. Item correlations, scree plot, and confirmatory factory analysis examined the scale's internal structure and assessed model fit.

Results: Two hundred sixteen participants completed the scale. Item correlations were positive and significant (P < 0.001). Scree plot confirmed a single factor structure. Several indices supported an acceptable model fit (comparative fit index = 0.935, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.916, standardized root mean square residual = 0.05), although root mean square error of approximation (0.119) was poor. Cronbach's α was 0.94.

Conclusion: The Innovation Culture Scale is a valid and reliable measure to assess innovation culture in healthcare settings.

新创新文化量表的效度和信度©用于医疗保健设置。
目的:评价新编制的10项创新文化量表©的心理测量特性。背景:美国的医疗保健费用昂贵,健康状况不佳是常态。护士可以通过创新打破这种模式;然而,没有支持性的组织文化,创新就无法蓬勃发展。缺乏衡量医疗保健环境中创新文化的尺度,从而支持护理质量的改进。方法:东北地区卫生系统提供了5658名护士、医生和相关卫生专业人员的方便样本。尺度响应以数字方式获得。项目相关性、屏幕图和验证性工厂分析检查了量表的内部结构并评估了模型拟合。结果:216名参与者完成了量表。项目相关性为正且显著(P < 0.001)。碎石地块证实为单因素结构。多个指标支持可接受的模型拟合(比较拟合指数= 0.935,Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.916,标准化均方根残差= 0.05),但近似均方根误差(0.119)较差。Cronbach’s α为0.94。结论:创新文化量表是一种有效、可靠的评估医疗机构创新文化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信