{"title":"Peer Review Outcomes Supporting Professional Nursing Excellence and Readiness: A Multisite Study.","authors":"Beverly Procope, Ifeoma Nnaji, Peggy Kalowes","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore RNs' perceptions of peer-to-peer feedback (PF), their comfort with giving/receiving PF, and its impact on autonomy/patient safety.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>PF promotes professional governance, self-regulation, empowerment, safety, and quality. Robust empirical evidence of effective PF processes is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, correlational study with an online PF survey was used to measure RNs' perceptions of PF, and potential correlates with nursing autonomy, satisfaction, and patient safety/quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 983 RNs, 588 (59.8%) reported that PF was a comfortable/positive experience and was viewed as valuable for identifying care issues and fostering growth. A strong correlation to work satisfaction was found among nurses who felt autonomous and engaged in PF concerning care quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study outcomes confirm the predictive value of nurses' perceived comfort in giving/receiving PF to enhance autonomy, quality/safety, and satisfaction. Data support the need for organizational leaders to strengthen the structures and processes to support a robust peer feedback program.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore RNs' perceptions of peer-to-peer feedback (PF), their comfort with giving/receiving PF, and its impact on autonomy/patient safety.
Background: PF promotes professional governance, self-regulation, empowerment, safety, and quality. Robust empirical evidence of effective PF processes is lacking.
Methods: A descriptive, correlational study with an online PF survey was used to measure RNs' perceptions of PF, and potential correlates with nursing autonomy, satisfaction, and patient safety/quality.
Results: Of 983 RNs, 588 (59.8%) reported that PF was a comfortable/positive experience and was viewed as valuable for identifying care issues and fostering growth. A strong correlation to work satisfaction was found among nurses who felt autonomous and engaged in PF concerning care quality.
Conclusions: Study outcomes confirm the predictive value of nurses' perceived comfort in giving/receiving PF to enhance autonomy, quality/safety, and satisfaction. Data support the need for organizational leaders to strengthen the structures and processes to support a robust peer feedback program.
期刊介绍：
JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
