Cost effectiveness of mono, dual, and triple therapy of antihypertensive drugs: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Abdullah, Zirwa Asim
{"title":"Cost effectiveness of mono, dual, and triple therapy of antihypertensive drugs: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Abdullah, Zirwa Asim","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00614-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a prevalent global health issue with far-reaching consequences. It impacts millions of individuals worldwide and poses significant risks to overall health. We aimed to explore and compare the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of single, dual, and triple antihypertensive therapies in the management of blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective observational study evaluated the cost effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy from the inpatient records of hypertensive urgency patients from January 2022 to December 2022. Data was extracted from the medical records including crucial information such as MR number, name, gender, weight, dates of admission and discharge, co-morbidities, therapy type, prescribed drugs and doses, and blood pressure readings. Employing standard costing techniques, the study calculated direct medical costs associated with the patient's stay, medical care, nursing, and medication charges, considering the timeframe of August 2023. Data was analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann Whitney and Kruskall Walis test was performed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 120 patients, the majority were male 55% and between the age group 61-80 years i.e., 45%. The analysis revealed a statistically significant impact on systolic blood pressure across the different therapies. Monotherapy resulted in a higher median systolic BP (140.0 mmHg [IQR 6.27]) compared to dual therapy (136.7 mmHg [IQR 6.7]) and triple therapy (133.3 mmHg [IQR 10.0]), with a significant difference (p = 0.000). In terms of cost-effectiveness, triple therapy demonstrated the lowest average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) for systolic BP control PKR 1803, while dual therapy was the most cost-effective for diastolic BP management with PKR 2438.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded triple therapy as the most cost effective strategy for reducing systolic blood pressure, demonstrating its efficacy in blood pressure management. Conversely, dual therapy proved optimal for controlling diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>IRB # 0126 - 23 Dated: 24 July 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00614-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a prevalent global health issue with far-reaching consequences. It impacts millions of individuals worldwide and poses significant risks to overall health. We aimed to explore and compare the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of single, dual, and triple antihypertensive therapies in the management of blood pressure.

Method: This retrospective observational study evaluated the cost effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy from the inpatient records of hypertensive urgency patients from January 2022 to December 2022. Data was extracted from the medical records including crucial information such as MR number, name, gender, weight, dates of admission and discharge, co-morbidities, therapy type, prescribed drugs and doses, and blood pressure readings. Employing standard costing techniques, the study calculated direct medical costs associated with the patient's stay, medical care, nursing, and medication charges, considering the timeframe of August 2023. Data was analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann Whitney and Kruskall Walis test was performed for statistical analysis.

Results: Out of 120 patients, the majority were male 55% and between the age group 61-80 years i.e., 45%. The analysis revealed a statistically significant impact on systolic blood pressure across the different therapies. Monotherapy resulted in a higher median systolic BP (140.0 mmHg [IQR 6.27]) compared to dual therapy (136.7 mmHg [IQR 6.7]) and triple therapy (133.3 mmHg [IQR 10.0]), with a significant difference (p = 0.000). In terms of cost-effectiveness, triple therapy demonstrated the lowest average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) for systolic BP control PKR 1803, while dual therapy was the most cost-effective for diastolic BP management with PKR 2438.

Conclusion: The study concluded triple therapy as the most cost effective strategy for reducing systolic blood pressure, demonstrating its efficacy in blood pressure management. Conversely, dual therapy proved optimal for controlling diastolic blood pressure.

Registration: IRB # 0126 - 23 Dated: 24 July 2023.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗高血压药物单、双、三联治疗的成本效益:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:高血压是一个普遍的全球性健康问题,影响深远。它影响到全世界数百万人,并对整体健康构成重大风险。我们的目的是探讨和比较单、双、三联降压治疗在血压管理中的成本-效果和临床疗效。方法:本回顾性观察研究对2022年1月至2022年12月高血压急症患者的住院记录进行降压治疗的成本-效果评估。从医疗记录中提取数据,包括MR数字、姓名、性别、体重、入院和出院日期、合并症、治疗类型、处方药物和剂量以及血压读数等关键信息。该研究采用标准成本计算技术,计算了与患者住院、医疗护理、护理和药物费用相关的直接医疗费用,考虑到2023年8月的时间框架。数据采用SPSS和Microsoft Excel进行分析。采用Mann Whitney和Kruskall Walis检验进行统计分析。结果:120例患者中,男性占55%,年龄61 ~ 80岁占45%。分析显示,不同的治疗方法对收缩压有统计学上的显著影响。单药治疗的中位收缩压(140.0 mmHg [IQR 6.27])高于双药治疗(136.7 mmHg [IQR 6.7])和三联治疗(133.3 mmHg [IQR 10.0]),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.000)。在成本-效果方面,三联疗法在控制收缩压PKR 1803方面的平均成本-效果比(ACER)最低,而在控制舒张压PKR 2438方面,双联疗法的成本-效果比最高。结论:该研究得出三联疗法是降低收缩压最经济有效的策略,证明了其在血压管理方面的有效性。相反,双重治疗被证明是控制舒张压的最佳方法。注册:IRB # 0126 - 23日期:2023年7月24日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信