Optimizing Documentation Integrity of Ophthalmic Diagnostic Test Interpretation through Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1055/a-2581-5739
Lydia J Yang, Molly Kuhn, James M Blum, Andrew E Pouw
{"title":"Optimizing Documentation Integrity of Ophthalmic Diagnostic Test Interpretation through Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support.","authors":"Lydia J Yang, Molly Kuhn, James M Blum, Andrew E Pouw","doi":"10.1055/a-2581-5739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized clinical practice, but clinicians and institutions have not yet fully optimized their use. Inconsistent documentation of ophthalmic test results can increase potential medicolegal risks if providers bill for tests without properly documenting clinical interpretations.To address this, we developed and implemented a logic tool in Epic (Epic Systems, Verona, Wisconsin, United States) that prompts clinicians to document diagnostic test interpretations as discrete data before closing the patient chart.We implemented a \"Close Encounter Warning\" using logic rules to redirect clinicians to the Imaging and Procedures section of the Epic chart for documenting test interpretations. The implementation only allows clinicians to finalize each outpatient encounter's charting as closed if the logic rules confirm that no unsigned test results remain. The logic rules were revised many times to accommodate the unique workflow of the Ophthalmology department and to consider the roles of fellows, residents, and staff who also work with encounter charting. We implemented the initial logic rule on October 23, 21 and the final iteration on February8, 22. To evaluate the impact, we compared the number of closed charts containing unresulted diagnostic tests from October 2017 to December 2024.Before we implemented the logic rules, clinicians closed an average of 897.1 charts per month with unresulted diagnostic images (median: 916, interquartile range [IQR]: 170, 5.78% of all outpatient encounters). After implementation, this number dropped to 8.3 per month (median: 8, IQR: 5.75, 0.05% of all outpatient encounters), a 108% reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001).The Close Encounter Warning logic rules significantly reduced the number of Imaging and Procedure-type diagnostic tests lacking final attending signatures in the Ophthalmology department. By implementing this EHR change, we successfully minimized potential medicolegal liability for our clinicians and institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"786-795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2581-5739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized clinical practice, but clinicians and institutions have not yet fully optimized their use. Inconsistent documentation of ophthalmic test results can increase potential medicolegal risks if providers bill for tests without properly documenting clinical interpretations.To address this, we developed and implemented a logic tool in Epic (Epic Systems, Verona, Wisconsin, United States) that prompts clinicians to document diagnostic test interpretations as discrete data before closing the patient chart.We implemented a "Close Encounter Warning" using logic rules to redirect clinicians to the Imaging and Procedures section of the Epic chart for documenting test interpretations. The implementation only allows clinicians to finalize each outpatient encounter's charting as closed if the logic rules confirm that no unsigned test results remain. The logic rules were revised many times to accommodate the unique workflow of the Ophthalmology department and to consider the roles of fellows, residents, and staff who also work with encounter charting. We implemented the initial logic rule on October 23, 21 and the final iteration on February8, 22. To evaluate the impact, we compared the number of closed charts containing unresulted diagnostic tests from October 2017 to December 2024.Before we implemented the logic rules, clinicians closed an average of 897.1 charts per month with unresulted diagnostic images (median: 916, interquartile range [IQR]: 170, 5.78% of all outpatient encounters). After implementation, this number dropped to 8.3 per month (median: 8, IQR: 5.75, 0.05% of all outpatient encounters), a 108% reduction (p < 0.001).The Close Encounter Warning logic rules significantly reduced the number of Imaging and Procedure-type diagnostic tests lacking final attending signatures in the Ophthalmology department. By implementing this EHR change, we successfully minimized potential medicolegal liability for our clinicians and institution.

通过电子健康记录临床决策支持优化眼科诊断测试解释的文件完整性。
电子健康记录(EHRs)已经彻底改变了临床实践,但临床医生和机构尚未充分优化其使用。眼科检查结果文件不一致,如果提供者在没有适当记录临床解释的情况下为检查开出账单,可能会增加潜在的医学风险。为了解决这个问题,我们在Epic (Epic Systems, Verona, Wisconsin, United States)中开发并实现了一个逻辑工具,该工具提示临床医生在关闭患者图表之前将诊断测试解释作为离散数据记录下来。我们使用逻辑规则实现了“近距离接触警告”,将临床医生重定向到Epic图表的成像和程序部分,以记录测试解释。该实施只允许临床医生在逻辑规则确认没有未签名的测试结果存在的情况下,将每次门诊就诊的图表确定为关闭。逻辑规则经过多次修改,以适应眼科独特的工作流程,并考虑到同事、住院医生和工作人员的角色。我们在21年10月23日实现了初始逻辑规则,22年2月8日实现了最终迭代。为了评估影响,我们比较了2017年10月至2024年12月包含未结果诊断测试的封闭图表的数量。在我们实施逻辑规则之前,临床医生每月平均关闭897.1张带有未结果诊断图像的图表(中位数:916,四分位数间距[IQR]: 170,占所有门诊就诊的5.78%)。实施后,这一数字降至每月8.3例(中位数:8,IQR: 5.75,占所有门诊就诊的0.05%),减少了108% (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信