Intermittent vs Continuous Pulse Oximetry for Bronchiolitis Hospitalizations: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing
Katherine Salada, Jodi Ehrmann, Kate M Saylor, Sanjay Mahant
{"title":"Intermittent vs Continuous Pulse Oximetry for Bronchiolitis Hospitalizations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Katherine Salada, Jodi Ehrmann, Kate M Saylor, Sanjay Mahant","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The decision to use pulse oximetry continuously or intermittently for patients admitted to the hospital with bronchiolitis varies among providers and institutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intermittent vs continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until December 13, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies of children younger than 2 years admitted with bronchiolitis that reported outcomes of continuous and intermittent pulse oximetry were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility. Study characteristics, study quality, and outcomes were extracted from each article. Studies were heterogeneous in design; therefore, a synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2299 citations identified, 187 were reviewed in full text, and 11 studies included. Two multicenter randomized control trials (RCTs) (n = 390) found that intermittent monitoring had similar length of stay (LOS) and supplemental oxygen duration, without increased intensive care unit transfer rates. One economic evaluation found similar health care and societal costs between monitoring strategies. One cohort study found increased alarm burden with continuous monitoring. Cross-sectional studies reported that continuous monitors were helpful and provided security to parents but were associated with increased parental anxiety and fatigue. Quality improvement studies of bundled interventions found reduced or similar LOS with intermittent monitoring, with no change in readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on RCTs, intermittent and continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis have similar outcomes of LOS, supplemental oxygen duration, safety, and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e460-e473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The decision to use pulse oximetry continuously or intermittently for patients admitted to the hospital with bronchiolitis varies among providers and institutions.

Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intermittent vs continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis.

Data sources: The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until December 13, 2024.

Study selection: Studies of children younger than 2 years admitted with bronchiolitis that reported outcomes of continuous and intermittent pulse oximetry were included.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility. Study characteristics, study quality, and outcomes were extracted from each article. Studies were heterogeneous in design; therefore, a synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: Of 2299 citations identified, 187 were reviewed in full text, and 11 studies included. Two multicenter randomized control trials (RCTs) (n = 390) found that intermittent monitoring had similar length of stay (LOS) and supplemental oxygen duration, without increased intensive care unit transfer rates. One economic evaluation found similar health care and societal costs between monitoring strategies. One cohort study found increased alarm burden with continuous monitoring. Cross-sectional studies reported that continuous monitors were helpful and provided security to parents but were associated with increased parental anxiety and fatigue. Quality improvement studies of bundled interventions found reduced or similar LOS with intermittent monitoring, with no change in readmission rates.

Conclusions: Based on RCTs, intermittent and continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis have similar outcomes of LOS, supplemental oxygen duration, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

间歇与连续脉搏血氧测定在毛细支气管炎住院治疗中的应用:一项系统综述
背景:对于住院的毛细支气管炎患者,连续或间歇使用脉搏血氧仪的决定因提供者和机构而异。目的:系统评价间歇与连续脉搏血氧仪监测在毛细支气管炎住院儿童中的有效性、安全性和成本效益。数据来源:PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus和Web of Science数据库检索至2024年12月13日。研究选择:纳入了报告连续和间歇脉搏血氧测定结果的2岁以下毛细支气管炎患儿的研究。数据提取:两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文是否合格。从每篇文章中提取研究特征、研究质量和结果。研究在设计上是异质的;因此,我们进行了不进行meta分析的综合研究。结果:在2299篇文献中,187篇文献被全文收录,11篇文献被收录。两项多中心随机对照试验(rct) (n = 390)发现,间歇监测具有相似的住院时间(LOS)和补充氧气时间,没有增加重症监护病房转院率。一项经济评估发现,监测战略之间的医疗保健和社会成本相似。一项队列研究发现,持续监测会增加警报负担。横断面研究报告称,持续监测是有帮助的,为父母提供了安全感,但与父母焦虑和疲劳增加有关。对捆绑干预措施的质量改进研究发现,间歇性监测降低或相似的LOS,再入院率没有变化。结论:基于随机对照试验,间歇和连续脉搏血氧仪监测在毛细支气管炎住院儿童的LOS、补充氧持续时间、安全性和成本效益方面具有相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信