Pain in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and association with physical function and psychosocial well-being using patient-reported outcome measures.
Jarod T Griffin, Anita Bagley, Henry Iwinski, Vishwas Talwalkar, Rolando Roberto, David Dueber, Donna Oeffinger
{"title":"Pain in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and association with physical function and psychosocial well-being using patient-reported outcome measures.","authors":"Jarod T Griffin, Anita Bagley, Henry Iwinski, Vishwas Talwalkar, Rolando Roberto, David Dueber, Donna Oeffinger","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01121-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study addressed conflicting evidence regarding pain in adolescents with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by assessing its prevalence and consequences on physical function, and psychosocial well-being in our patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>95 patients with AIS participated in a cross-sectional, observational study. Patient information, clinical and radiographic measures were collected. Participants completed four pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) along with physical function and psychosocial PROs. Means, standard deviations (SD), interquartile ranges (IQR), and ceiling/floor percentages were calculated for each pain-related PRO. Pain prevalence was defined as percentage of participants exceeding one SD and percentage of participants above two SD of published normative values. Correlations assessed associations between pain-PRO scores and scores on other study measures. Differences in PRO scores between High Pain (HP) and Remaining Cohort (RC) groups, established through interquartile thresholds, were assessed via ANOVA and Cohen's d.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort mean age was 14.1 ± 1.7 years, and mean curve magnitude of primary curve was 33 ± 13°. Pain prevalence ranged from 1 to 37% depending on the pain-related PRO. HP groups scored worse on physical function and psychosocial PROs than RC, but no differences between the groups were found for clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relationships among pain, physical function, psychosocial well-being PRO scores, and clinical measures were established but causality could not be demonstrated. Most patients did not report pain. HP patients scored lower on physical function and psychosocial well-being PROs. HP threshold values can be used to identify HP patients so that interventions to reduce pain can be incorporated into their treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01121-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study addressed conflicting evidence regarding pain in adolescents with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by assessing its prevalence and consequences on physical function, and psychosocial well-being in our patients.
Methods: 95 patients with AIS participated in a cross-sectional, observational study. Patient information, clinical and radiographic measures were collected. Participants completed four pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) along with physical function and psychosocial PROs. Means, standard deviations (SD), interquartile ranges (IQR), and ceiling/floor percentages were calculated for each pain-related PRO. Pain prevalence was defined as percentage of participants exceeding one SD and percentage of participants above two SD of published normative values. Correlations assessed associations between pain-PRO scores and scores on other study measures. Differences in PRO scores between High Pain (HP) and Remaining Cohort (RC) groups, established through interquartile thresholds, were assessed via ANOVA and Cohen's d.
Results: Cohort mean age was 14.1 ± 1.7 years, and mean curve magnitude of primary curve was 33 ± 13°. Pain prevalence ranged from 1 to 37% depending on the pain-related PRO. HP groups scored worse on physical function and psychosocial PROs than RC, but no differences between the groups were found for clinical measures.
Conclusion: Relationships among pain, physical function, psychosocial well-being PRO scores, and clinical measures were established but causality could not be demonstrated. Most patients did not report pain. HP patients scored lower on physical function and psychosocial well-being PROs. HP threshold values can be used to identify HP patients so that interventions to reduce pain can be incorporated into their treatment plan.
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.