Amanda O'Halloran, James Sannino, Cheryl Dominick, Christine Bailey, Lori Boyle, Lindsay N Shepard, Vinay Nadkarni, Heather Wolfe, Ryan W Morgan, Akira Nishisaki, Meghan Lane-Fall, Robert Sutton
{"title":"Development of a Novel Cardiac Arrest Ventilation Rate Metronome: A Human Factors and Implementation Science Mixed-Methods Approach.","authors":"Amanda O'Halloran, James Sannino, Cheryl Dominick, Christine Bailey, Lori Boyle, Lindsay N Shepard, Vinay Nadkarni, Heather Wolfe, Ryan W Morgan, Akira Nishisaki, Meghan Lane-Fall, Robert Sutton","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Excessive ventilation adversely affects cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) hemodynamics and outcomes. Pediatric providers rarely achieve guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates. We aimed to use human factors engineering to design a metronome to improve compliance with recommended CPR ventilation rates. We hypothesized that in usability testing, our novel metronome would achieve: 1) a System Usability Scale (SUS) score greater than 68 and 2) greater than 70% of CPR epochs with ventilation rates within target range, which would be sufficient to support a pilot trial in our PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective single-center mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventy-five-bed academic PICU.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Multidisciplinary clinicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We elicited clinician feedback on the proposed ventilation rate metronome with a survey. Participatory design sessions determined optimal metronome components. During high-fidelity simulation usability testing, we collected qualitative and quantitative measures reflecting participant feedback and performance. Average ventilation rates were calculated during 30-second epochs of CPR, with average rates ± 2 breaths/min (bpm) from the target considered to be within goal range. Among 107 survey respondents, perceptions of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the ventilation rate metronome were favorable. The final prototype used a bell sound for high saliency in noisy environments and a scrolling timed vertical bar, with pre-set options for three guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates (infants: 30 bpm, children 1-17 yr old: 20 bpm, adults: 10 bpm). In usability testing (three groups, 34 clinicians), median SUS was 92.5 of 100 (interquartile range, 89.4-93.1), with 0 attributable errors. Overall, 34 of 36 (94% [95% CI, 81-99%]) epochs of simulated CPR with metronome use had ventilation rates ± 2 bpm from the target rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing human factors engineering and implementation science, we successfully designed a novel ventilation rate metronome. When deployed during high-fidelity cardiac arrest simulations, metronome use had high usability scores and resulted in excellent compliance with recommended ventilation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1264-e1274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Excessive ventilation adversely affects cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) hemodynamics and outcomes. Pediatric providers rarely achieve guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates. We aimed to use human factors engineering to design a metronome to improve compliance with recommended CPR ventilation rates. We hypothesized that in usability testing, our novel metronome would achieve: 1) a System Usability Scale (SUS) score greater than 68 and 2) greater than 70% of CPR epochs with ventilation rates within target range, which would be sufficient to support a pilot trial in our PICU.
Measurements and main results: We elicited clinician feedback on the proposed ventilation rate metronome with a survey. Participatory design sessions determined optimal metronome components. During high-fidelity simulation usability testing, we collected qualitative and quantitative measures reflecting participant feedback and performance. Average ventilation rates were calculated during 30-second epochs of CPR, with average rates ± 2 breaths/min (bpm) from the target considered to be within goal range. Among 107 survey respondents, perceptions of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the ventilation rate metronome were favorable. The final prototype used a bell sound for high saliency in noisy environments and a scrolling timed vertical bar, with pre-set options for three guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates (infants: 30 bpm, children 1-17 yr old: 20 bpm, adults: 10 bpm). In usability testing (three groups, 34 clinicians), median SUS was 92.5 of 100 (interquartile range, 89.4-93.1), with 0 attributable errors. Overall, 34 of 36 (94% [95% CI, 81-99%]) epochs of simulated CPR with metronome use had ventilation rates ± 2 bpm from the target rate.
Conclusions: Utilizing human factors engineering and implementation science, we successfully designed a novel ventilation rate metronome. When deployed during high-fidelity cardiac arrest simulations, metronome use had high usability scores and resulted in excellent compliance with recommended ventilation rates.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.