Development of a Novel Cardiac Arrest Ventilation Rate Metronome: A Human Factors and Implementation Science Mixed-Methods Approach.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003811
Amanda O'Halloran, James Sannino, Cheryl Dominick, Christine Bailey, Lori Boyle, Lindsay N Shepard, Vinay Nadkarni, Heather Wolfe, Ryan W Morgan, Akira Nishisaki, Meghan Lane-Fall, Robert Sutton
{"title":"Development of a Novel Cardiac Arrest Ventilation Rate Metronome: A Human Factors and Implementation Science Mixed-Methods Approach.","authors":"Amanda O'Halloran, James Sannino, Cheryl Dominick, Christine Bailey, Lori Boyle, Lindsay N Shepard, Vinay Nadkarni, Heather Wolfe, Ryan W Morgan, Akira Nishisaki, Meghan Lane-Fall, Robert Sutton","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Excessive ventilation adversely affects cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) hemodynamics and outcomes. Pediatric providers rarely achieve guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates. We aimed to use human factors engineering to design a metronome to improve compliance with recommended CPR ventilation rates. We hypothesized that in usability testing, our novel metronome would achieve: 1) a System Usability Scale (SUS) score greater than 68 and 2) greater than 70% of CPR epochs with ventilation rates within target range, which would be sufficient to support a pilot trial in our PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective single-center mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventy-five-bed academic PICU.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Multidisciplinary clinicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We elicited clinician feedback on the proposed ventilation rate metronome with a survey. Participatory design sessions determined optimal metronome components. During high-fidelity simulation usability testing, we collected qualitative and quantitative measures reflecting participant feedback and performance. Average ventilation rates were calculated during 30-second epochs of CPR, with average rates ± 2 breaths/min (bpm) from the target considered to be within goal range. Among 107 survey respondents, perceptions of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the ventilation rate metronome were favorable. The final prototype used a bell sound for high saliency in noisy environments and a scrolling timed vertical bar, with pre-set options for three guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates (infants: 30 bpm, children 1-17 yr old: 20 bpm, adults: 10 bpm). In usability testing (three groups, 34 clinicians), median SUS was 92.5 of 100 (interquartile range, 89.4-93.1), with 0 attributable errors. Overall, 34 of 36 (94% [95% CI, 81-99%]) epochs of simulated CPR with metronome use had ventilation rates ± 2 bpm from the target rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing human factors engineering and implementation science, we successfully designed a novel ventilation rate metronome. When deployed during high-fidelity cardiac arrest simulations, metronome use had high usability scores and resulted in excellent compliance with recommended ventilation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1264-e1274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Excessive ventilation adversely affects cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) hemodynamics and outcomes. Pediatric providers rarely achieve guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates. We aimed to use human factors engineering to design a metronome to improve compliance with recommended CPR ventilation rates. We hypothesized that in usability testing, our novel metronome would achieve: 1) a System Usability Scale (SUS) score greater than 68 and 2) greater than 70% of CPR epochs with ventilation rates within target range, which would be sufficient to support a pilot trial in our PICU.

Design: Prospective single-center mixed-methods study.

Setting: Seventy-five-bed academic PICU.

Participants: Multidisciplinary clinicians.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We elicited clinician feedback on the proposed ventilation rate metronome with a survey. Participatory design sessions determined optimal metronome components. During high-fidelity simulation usability testing, we collected qualitative and quantitative measures reflecting participant feedback and performance. Average ventilation rates were calculated during 30-second epochs of CPR, with average rates ± 2 breaths/min (bpm) from the target considered to be within goal range. Among 107 survey respondents, perceptions of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the ventilation rate metronome were favorable. The final prototype used a bell sound for high saliency in noisy environments and a scrolling timed vertical bar, with pre-set options for three guideline-recommended CPR ventilation rates (infants: 30 bpm, children 1-17 yr old: 20 bpm, adults: 10 bpm). In usability testing (three groups, 34 clinicians), median SUS was 92.5 of 100 (interquartile range, 89.4-93.1), with 0 attributable errors. Overall, 34 of 36 (94% [95% CI, 81-99%]) epochs of simulated CPR with metronome use had ventilation rates ± 2 bpm from the target rate.

Conclusions: Utilizing human factors engineering and implementation science, we successfully designed a novel ventilation rate metronome. When deployed during high-fidelity cardiac arrest simulations, metronome use had high usability scores and resulted in excellent compliance with recommended ventilation rates.

一种新型心脏骤停通气率节拍器的研制:人为因素与实施科学的混合方法。
目的:过度通气对心肺复苏(CPR)血流动力学和结果有不利影响。儿科医生很少能达到指南推荐的CPR通气率。我们的目的是利用人因工程设计一个节拍器来提高心肺复苏术通气率的依从性。我们假设,在可用性测试中,我们的新型节拍器将达到:1)系统可用性量表(SUS)得分大于68分;2)通气率在目标范围内的心肺复苏术时间大于70%,这将足以支持我们在PICU进行试点试验。设计:前瞻性单中心混合方法研究。环境:75个床位的学术PICU。参与者:多学科临床医生。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:我们通过调查获得了临床医生对拟议的通气率节拍器的反馈。参与式设计会议确定了最佳节拍器组件。在高保真仿真可用性测试中,我们收集了反映参与者反馈和表现的定性和定量措施。计算心肺复苏术每30秒的平均通气率,平均通气率±2次/分钟(bpm)被认为在目标范围内。在107名调查对象中,通气率节拍器的适当性、可接受性和可行性的看法是有利的。最终的原型使用了铃声,在嘈杂的环境中具有很高的显着性,并使用了滚动定时垂直条,并预先设置了三种指南推荐的心肺复苏术通气速率(婴儿:每分钟30次,1-17岁儿童:每分钟20次,成人:每分钟10次)。在可用性测试中(三组,34名临床医生),SUS中位数为92.5 / 100(四分位数间距为89.4-93.1),无归因误差。总体而言,36个(94% [95% CI, 81-99%])使用节拍器的模拟心肺复苏术周期中,有34个周期的通气速率比目标速率±2 bpm。结论:利用人因工程学和实施科学,我们成功地设计了一种新型的通气率节拍器。当在高保真心脏骤停模拟中部署时,节拍器的使用具有很高的可用性得分,并且对推荐的通气率有很好的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信