Prognostic value of CMR parametric mapping in cardiac amyloidosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Seyed Ali Forouzannia, Seyedeh Romina Rafiei Alavi, Seyed Mohammad Forouzannia, Jawdat Abdulla, Adam Ioannou, Giulia Francese, Muhammad Umair
{"title":"Prognostic value of CMR parametric mapping in cardiac amyloidosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Seyed Ali Forouzannia, Seyedeh Romina Rafiei Alavi, Seyed Mohammad Forouzannia, Jawdat Abdulla, Adam Ioannou, Giulia Francese, Muhammad Umair","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the leading cause of mortality in systemic amyloidosis, highlighting the need for accurate risk assessment to guide patient management. While the diagnostic value of cardiac MR (CMR) parametric mapping is well established, its prognostic utility remains inconsistent across studies. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR parametric mapping in predicting all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies were observational studies that reported HRs for predicting predefined outcomes in patients with CA using CMR parametric mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 studies with 3398 patients were included in this systematic review. Higher extracellular volume (ECV) values were associated with increased mortality, both as a dichotomous (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.01) and continuous variable (HR for 1% increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.10; HR for 3% increase: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.22 and HR for 10% increase: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.62). Higher native T1 mapping values were associated with mortality as a dichotomous variable (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.24). Native T2 mapping showed inconsistent associations with prognosis across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher ECV and native T1 values are associated with worse prognosis in CA, supporting their role in risk stratification. Further studies with standardised CMR protocols are needed to enhance the prognostic utility of parametric mapping in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the leading cause of mortality in systemic amyloidosis, highlighting the need for accurate risk assessment to guide patient management. While the diagnostic value of cardiac MR (CMR) parametric mapping is well established, its prognostic utility remains inconsistent across studies. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR parametric mapping in predicting all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CA.

Methods: An extensive search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies were observational studies that reported HRs for predicting predefined outcomes in patients with CA using CMR parametric mapping.

Results: 22 studies with 3398 patients were included in this systematic review. Higher extracellular volume (ECV) values were associated with increased mortality, both as a dichotomous (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.01) and continuous variable (HR for 1% increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.10; HR for 3% increase: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.22 and HR for 10% increase: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.62). Higher native T1 mapping values were associated with mortality as a dichotomous variable (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.24). Native T2 mapping showed inconsistent associations with prognosis across studies.

Conclusions: Higher ECV and native T1 values are associated with worse prognosis in CA, supporting their role in risk stratification. Further studies with standardised CMR protocols are needed to enhance the prognostic utility of parametric mapping in clinical practice.

CMR参数定位对心脏淀粉样变性的预后价值:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:心脏淀粉样变性(CA)是全身性淀粉样变性死亡的主要原因,强调需要准确的风险评估来指导患者管理。虽然心脏MR (CMR)参数映射的诊断价值已经确立,但其预后效用在研究中仍然不一致。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来评估CMR参数映射在预测ca患者全因死亡率、心力衰竭住院率和主要心血管不良事件方面的预后价值。方法:在Medline、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行广泛检索。符合条件的研究是观察性研究,这些研究报告了使用CMR参数映射预测CA患者预定结局的hr。结果:22项研究共3398例患者纳入本系统综述。较高的细胞外体积(ECV)值与死亡率增加相关,两者均为二分法(HR: 2.90;95% CI: 1.68 ~ 5.01)和连续变量(增加1%的HR: 1.08;95% CI: 1.06 ~ 1.10;HR增加3%:1.17;95% CI: 1.11 ~ 1.22, 10%的HR增加:2.11;95% CI: 1.70 - 2.62)。作为二分类变量,较高的原生T1映射值与死亡率相关(HR: 1.33;95% CI: 0.79 ~ 2.24)。在不同的研究中,原生T2定位与预后的相关性不一致。结论:较高的ECV和原生T1值与CA预后较差相关,支持其在风险分层中的作用。需要进一步研究标准化的CMR协议,以提高参数映射在临床实践中的预后效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信