REaCT-5G: a randomized trial of bone pain with 5-day filgrastim vs pegfilgrastim for neutropenia in breast cancer.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Terry L Ng, Peter Greenstreet, Carol Stober, Stuart Nicholls, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, Mohammed Ibrahim, Marie-France Savard, Moira Rushton, Arif Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Xinni Song, Parvaneh Fallah, Nasser Alqahtani, Daniel Davoudpour, Kelly Daigle, Fiona MacDonald, Lisa Vandermeer, Monica Taljaard, Mark Clemons
{"title":"REaCT-5G: a randomized trial of bone pain with 5-day filgrastim vs pegfilgrastim for neutropenia in breast cancer.","authors":"Terry L Ng, Peter Greenstreet, Carol Stober, Stuart Nicholls, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, Mohammed Ibrahim, Marie-France Savard, Moira Rushton, Arif Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Xinni Song, Parvaneh Fallah, Nasser Alqahtani, Daniel Davoudpour, Kelly Daigle, Fiona MacDonald, Lisa Vandermeer, Monica Taljaard, Mark Clemons","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), including filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, are associated with bone pain, potentially impacting treatment adherence. This study hypothesized that a 5-day regimen of filgrastim would result in less bone pain than single-dose pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients requiring prophylactic G-CSF during chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either 5-day filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. The primary outcome was patient-reported bone pain, assessed as area under the curve of daily pain scores (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain) over the first 5 days following G-CSF in cycle 1. Secondary outcomes included bone pain in cycles 2-4, febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, early discontinuations, chemotherapy-related deaths, health-related quality of life, and health-care resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 233 patients were randomly assigned, with 219 analyzed (110 filgrastim and 109 pegfilgrastim) after excluding those who withdrew before receiving treatment. Adjusting for stratification factors and prespecified baseline covariates using repeated measures linear regression, the mean area under the curve (0-40) for cycle 1 bone pain was 10.2 (11.2) for 5-day filgrastim and 10.2 (9.81) for pegfilgrastim, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.70 (95% confidence interval = 1.62 to 3.02; P = .556). Although no clinically significant differences were observed in most secondary outcomes, the 5-day filgrastim group exhibited a numerically higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (6.4% vs 0.9%, P = .065) and hospitalization (10.0% vs 3.7%, P = .106).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in bone pain between 5-day filgrastim and pegfilgrastim.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), including filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, are associated with bone pain, potentially impacting treatment adherence. This study hypothesized that a 5-day regimen of filgrastim would result in less bone pain than single-dose pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients requiring prophylactic G-CSF during chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either 5-day filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. The primary outcome was patient-reported bone pain, assessed as area under the curve of daily pain scores (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain) over the first 5 days following G-CSF in cycle 1. Secondary outcomes included bone pain in cycles 2-4, febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, early discontinuations, chemotherapy-related deaths, health-related quality of life, and health-care resource utilization.

Results: From June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 233 patients were randomly assigned, with 219 analyzed (110 filgrastim and 109 pegfilgrastim) after excluding those who withdrew before receiving treatment. Adjusting for stratification factors and prespecified baseline covariates using repeated measures linear regression, the mean area under the curve (0-40) for cycle 1 bone pain was 10.2 (11.2) for 5-day filgrastim and 10.2 (9.81) for pegfilgrastim, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.70 (95% confidence interval = 1.62 to 3.02; P = .556). Although no clinically significant differences were observed in most secondary outcomes, the 5-day filgrastim group exhibited a numerically higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (6.4% vs 0.9%, P = .065) and hospitalization (10.0% vs 3.7%, P = .106).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in bone pain between 5-day filgrastim and pegfilgrastim.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

REaCT-5G: 5天非格昔汀与聚非格昔汀治疗乳腺癌中性粒细胞减少患者骨痛的随机试验。
粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),包括非格昔汀和聚非格昔汀,与骨痛相关,可能影响治疗依从性。本研究假设,在接受早期乳腺癌化疗的患者中,5天非格昔汀(5- fil)治疗方案比单剂量聚非格昔汀(PEG)治疗方案带来的骨痛更少。方法:在这项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验中,化疗期间需要预防性G-CSF的患者按1:1的比例随机分为5天的FIL或PEG。主要结果是患者报告的骨痛,在第1周期G-CSF治疗后的前5天内,以每日疼痛评分(0 =无疼痛至10 =最严重疼痛)的曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。次要结局包括第2-4周期骨痛、发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)、住院、化疗延迟、剂量减少、早期停药、化疗相关死亡、健康相关生活质量和医疗资源利用。结果:从2021年6月到2023年3月,233名患者被随机分组,在排除治疗前退出的患者后,分析了219名患者(110名FIL/109名PEG)。使用重复测量线性回归调整分层因素和预先指定的基线协变量,第1周期骨痛的平均AUC(0至40)为5天fil的10.2 (SD 11.2)和PEG的10.2 (SD 9.81),调整后的平均差异为0.70 (95% CI: -1.62, 3.02;p = .556)。虽然在大多数次要结局中没有观察到显著差异,但5天fil组FN发生率(6.4% vs 0.9%, p = 0.065)和住院率(10.0% vs 3.7%, p = 0.106)在数值上较高。结论:5 d fil与PEG在骨痛方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信