Methodological Techniques Used in Machine Learning to Support Individualized Drug Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic Data: A Scoping Review.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s40262-025-01547-8
Janthima Methaneethorn, Khanita Duangchaemkarn, Brad Reisfeld, Sohaib Habiballah
{"title":"Methodological Techniques Used in Machine Learning to Support Individualized Drug Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic Data: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Janthima Methaneethorn, Khanita Duangchaemkarn, Brad Reisfeld, Sohaib Habiballah","doi":"10.1007/s40262-025-01547-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Individualized drug dosing is a highly effective strategy for optimizing therapeutic outcomes, especially for drugs with high inter-individual variability. Population pharmacokinetic modeling is a widely used approach to characterize inter-individual variability in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the development of population pharmacokinetic models is labor intensive and requires significant technical expertise. Machine learning (ML) represents a promising alternative for personalized drug dosing strategies. Despite numerous studies applying ML in this context, no previous work has comprehensively reviewed and compared their methodologies and predictive performance. This scoping review addresses this gap in the existing literature with the aim to examine the methodological approaches used in ML-based pharmacokinetic modeling for dose optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were systematically searched from their inception to May 2025. Studies comparing predictions of drug concentrations or pharmacokinetic parameters between ML and population pharmacokinetic models were included. Studies published in non-English language, reviews, protocols, or studies that did not employ ML models for individualized dose regimens or treatment plans were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight studies were included. We found that boosting-based models, tree-based models, instance-based, and regression-based models were the most commonly used ML approaches. Approximately 31% of the studies integrated ML with population pharmacokinetic models, while the remainder developed stand-alone ML models. Inconsistencies in reporting were evident, as only 60% of the studies detailed their feature selection methods. Model evaluation approaches also varied: 47% of ML models used internal test sets, while the remainder employed external datasets or mixed approaches. In terms of predictive accuracy, ML models performed comparably to or better than population pharmacokinetic models, especially for drugs with significant pharmacokinetic variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identifies substantial heterogeneity in ML modeling approaches, feature selection, and model evaluation. To enhance the reproducibility and clinical applicability of ML models in individualized drug dosing, standardization in reporting and methodological practices is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1295-1330"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01547-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Individualized drug dosing is a highly effective strategy for optimizing therapeutic outcomes, especially for drugs with high inter-individual variability. Population pharmacokinetic modeling is a widely used approach to characterize inter-individual variability in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the development of population pharmacokinetic models is labor intensive and requires significant technical expertise. Machine learning (ML) represents a promising alternative for personalized drug dosing strategies. Despite numerous studies applying ML in this context, no previous work has comprehensively reviewed and compared their methodologies and predictive performance. This scoping review addresses this gap in the existing literature with the aim to examine the methodological approaches used in ML-based pharmacokinetic modeling for dose optimization.

Methods: Five databases were systematically searched from their inception to May 2025. Studies comparing predictions of drug concentrations or pharmacokinetic parameters between ML and population pharmacokinetic models were included. Studies published in non-English language, reviews, protocols, or studies that did not employ ML models for individualized dose regimens or treatment plans were excluded.

Results: Fifty-eight studies were included. We found that boosting-based models, tree-based models, instance-based, and regression-based models were the most commonly used ML approaches. Approximately 31% of the studies integrated ML with population pharmacokinetic models, while the remainder developed stand-alone ML models. Inconsistencies in reporting were evident, as only 60% of the studies detailed their feature selection methods. Model evaluation approaches also varied: 47% of ML models used internal test sets, while the remainder employed external datasets or mixed approaches. In terms of predictive accuracy, ML models performed comparably to or better than population pharmacokinetic models, especially for drugs with significant pharmacokinetic variability.

Conclusions: This review identifies substantial heterogeneity in ML modeling approaches, feature selection, and model evaluation. To enhance the reproducibility and clinical applicability of ML models in individualized drug dosing, standardization in reporting and methodological practices is essential.

基于药代动力学数据的机器学习支持个体化给药方案的方法学技术:范围综述。
背景和目的:个体化给药是优化治疗效果的一种非常有效的策略,特别是对于具有高度个体间变异性的药物。群体药代动力学模型是一种广泛使用的方法来表征治疗药物监测中的个体间变异性。然而,群体药代动力学模型的开发是劳动密集型的,需要大量的技术专长。机器学习(ML)代表了个性化药物给药策略的一个有前途的替代方案。尽管有许多研究将机器学习应用于这一背景下,但之前的工作还没有全面审查和比较它们的方法和预测性能。这篇范围综述解决了现有文献中的这一空白,目的是研究基于ml的药代动力学模型用于剂量优化的方法学方法。方法:系统检索5个数据库自建库至2025年5月。包括比较ML和群体药代动力学模型之间药物浓度或药代动力学参数预测的研究。未采用ML模型进行个体化剂量方案或治疗方案的非英语文献、综述、方案或研究均被排除。结果:共纳入58项研究。我们发现基于提升的模型、基于树的模型、基于实例的模型和基于回归的模型是最常用的机器学习方法。大约31%的研究将ML与群体药代动力学模型结合起来,而其余的研究则建立了独立的ML模型。报告的不一致性是显而易见的,因为只有60%的研究详细说明了他们的特征选择方法。模型评估方法也各不相同:47%的ML模型使用内部测试集,而其余模型使用外部数据集或混合方法。在预测准确性方面,ML模型的表现与群体药代动力学模型相当或更好,特别是对于具有显著药代动力学变异性的药物。结论:本综述确定了机器学习建模方法、特征选择和模型评估的实质性异质性。为了提高ML模型在个体化给药中的可重复性和临床适用性,报告和方法学实践的标准化是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信