Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a comparison of published population pharmacokinetic models.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1128/aac.00257-25
Eva-Maria A Wansing, Emily Behrens, Nicolaus M Kröger, Claudia Langebrake, Sebastian G Wicha
{"title":"Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a comparison of published population pharmacokinetic models.","authors":"Eva-Maria A Wansing, Emily Behrens, Nicolaus M Kröger, Claudia Langebrake, Sebastian G Wicha","doi":"10.1128/aac.00257-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) often receive vancomycin as antibiotic treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM can be performed using a Bayesian approach, where concentration measurements are supported by a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a population as similar as possible to the treated patient. As a model developed in a similar population is not always available, it must be ensured that the predictive performance is not compromised. We retrospectively collected data from 121 adult allo-HSCT patients who received vancomycin treatment including trough concentration TDM between January and December 2021. Predictive performance of 21 published pharmacokinetic models was assessed by comparing the third observed vancomycin concentration per patient with the corresponding model prediction. Prediction was based on covariates alone (<i>a priori</i>) or covariates and TDM measurements (Bayesian). Predictive performance was quantified by a median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision. MPE ranged between -199.6% and 93.3% (<i>a priori</i>) and between -50.6% and 19.1% (Bayesian), while MAPE ranged between 31.6% and 199.6% (<i>a priori</i>) and between 19.8% and 53.5% (Bayesian). The Okada et al. model was one of the most accurate and precise models in the <i>a priori</i> (MPE: -4%; MAPE: 31.6%) and Bayesian scenario (MPE: -6.9%; MAPE: 19.8%). The model published by Okada et al. was developed in allo-HSCT patients. That may explain the high predictive performance, especially in the <i>a priori</i> scenario. We recommend the Okada et al. model for future TDM in allo-HSCT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0025725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00257-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) often receive vancomycin as antibiotic treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM can be performed using a Bayesian approach, where concentration measurements are supported by a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a population as similar as possible to the treated patient. As a model developed in a similar population is not always available, it must be ensured that the predictive performance is not compromised. We retrospectively collected data from 121 adult allo-HSCT patients who received vancomycin treatment including trough concentration TDM between January and December 2021. Predictive performance of 21 published pharmacokinetic models was assessed by comparing the third observed vancomycin concentration per patient with the corresponding model prediction. Prediction was based on covariates alone (a priori) or covariates and TDM measurements (Bayesian). Predictive performance was quantified by a median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision. MPE ranged between -199.6% and 93.3% (a priori) and between -50.6% and 19.1% (Bayesian), while MAPE ranged between 31.6% and 199.6% (a priori) and between 19.8% and 53.5% (Bayesian). The Okada et al. model was one of the most accurate and precise models in the a priori (MPE: -4%; MAPE: 31.6%) and Bayesian scenario (MPE: -6.9%; MAPE: 19.8%). The model published by Okada et al. was developed in allo-HSCT patients. That may explain the high predictive performance, especially in the a priori scenario. We recommend the Okada et al. model for future TDM in allo-HSCT patients.

万古霉素在异基因造血干细胞移植患者中的精确剂量:已发表的人群药代动力学模型的比较。
接受同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloo - hsct)的患者通常使用治疗性药物监测(TDM)将万古霉素作为抗生素治疗。TDM可以使用贝叶斯方法进行,其中浓度测量由先前开发的基于尽可能与治疗患者相似的人群的药代动力学模型支持。由于在相似人群中开发的模型并不总是可用的,因此必须确保预测性能不会受到损害。我们回顾性收集了2021年1月至12月期间接受万古霉素治疗(包括谷浓度TDM)的121例成人同种异体造血干细胞移植患者的数据。通过比较每个患者第三次观察到的万古霉素浓度与相应的模型预测,评估21个已发表的药代动力学模型的预测性能。预测仅基于协变量(先验)或协变量和TDM测量(贝叶斯)。预测性能通过准确度的中位数预测误差(MPE)和精度的中位数绝对预测误差(MAPE)来量化。MPE介于-199.6% ~ 93.3%(先验)和-50.6% ~ 19.1%(贝叶斯)之间,MAPE介于31.6% ~ 199.6%(先验)和19.8% ~ 53.5%(贝叶斯)之间。Okada等人的模型是先验中最准确和精确的模型之一(MPE: -4%;MPE: 31.6%)和贝叶斯情景(MPE: -6.9%;日军:19.8%)。Okada等人发表的模型是在同种异体造血干细胞移植患者中建立的。这也许可以解释高预测性能,特别是在先验情况下。我们推荐Okada等人的模型用于治疗同种异体造血干细胞移植患者未来的TDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信