CT angiography versus clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive gradients in coarctation and recoarctation of the aorta.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI:10.4103/apc.apc_221_24
André Vaz, Ludmila M Young, Renata Muller Couto, Kevin R M de Paula, Eduardo K U N Fonseca
{"title":"CT angiography versus clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive gradients in coarctation and recoarctation of the aorta.","authors":"André Vaz, Ludmila M Young, Renata Muller Couto, Kevin R M de Paula, Eduardo K U N Fonseca","doi":"10.4103/apc.apc_221_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic coarctation is a congenital heart disease characterized by narrowing of the distal aortic arch or isthmus. Its management relies on arterial hypertension, stenosis severity, and peak-to-peak gradients. Despite various assessment methods, there is limited discussion on measuring stenosis using computed tomography (CT) angiography and its correlation with clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive gradients, as well as surgical or endovascular indications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 129 patients with aortic coarctation or recoarctation who underwent clinical, echocardiographic, catheterization, and CT angiography. Patients with mid-arch hypoplasia and patent ductus arteriosus were excluded from the study. CT angiography was used, and detailed measurements of the aortic isthmus and diaphragmatic aorta were performed, including isthmus-to-diaphragm ratios, body surface area-indexed measurements, and <i>z</i>-scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple parameters presented moderate-to-high correlation with echocardiographic and invasive gradients. The best discriminator for significant invasive gradient (>20 mmHg) was the hydraulic diameter Pediatric Heart Network <i>z</i>-score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.869), and the best predictor for intervention was the minimum diameter Detroit z-score (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The isthmus-to-diaphragm area ratio presented good diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.814), with an optimal cutoff of 0.73 for a significant invasive gradient. Interobserver reliability was high (>0.9) for all measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT angiography-derived isthmus-to-diaphragmatic area ratio is a simple, accurate, and reliable assessment of aortic coarctation and recoarctation severity. These findings support its use in clinical decision-making and suggest potential for standardized protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":8026,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12348762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_221_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aortic coarctation is a congenital heart disease characterized by narrowing of the distal aortic arch or isthmus. Its management relies on arterial hypertension, stenosis severity, and peak-to-peak gradients. Despite various assessment methods, there is limited discussion on measuring stenosis using computed tomography (CT) angiography and its correlation with clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive gradients, as well as surgical or endovascular indications.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 129 patients with aortic coarctation or recoarctation who underwent clinical, echocardiographic, catheterization, and CT angiography. Patients with mid-arch hypoplasia and patent ductus arteriosus were excluded from the study. CT angiography was used, and detailed measurements of the aortic isthmus and diaphragmatic aorta were performed, including isthmus-to-diaphragm ratios, body surface area-indexed measurements, and z-scores.

Results: Multiple parameters presented moderate-to-high correlation with echocardiographic and invasive gradients. The best discriminator for significant invasive gradient (>20 mmHg) was the hydraulic diameter Pediatric Heart Network z-score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.869), and the best predictor for intervention was the minimum diameter Detroit z-score (P < 0.001). The isthmus-to-diaphragm area ratio presented good diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.814), with an optimal cutoff of 0.73 for a significant invasive gradient. Interobserver reliability was high (>0.9) for all measurements.

Conclusion: CT angiography-derived isthmus-to-diaphragmatic area ratio is a simple, accurate, and reliable assessment of aortic coarctation and recoarctation severity. These findings support its use in clinical decision-making and suggest potential for standardized protocols.

CT血管造影与临床、超声心动图和侵入性梯度在主动脉缩窄和再缩中的比较。
背景:主动脉缩窄是一种以主动脉弓或峡部远端狭窄为特征的先天性心脏病。其管理依赖于动脉高血压、狭窄严重程度和峰间梯度。尽管有多种评估方法,但关于使用计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影测量狭窄及其与临床、超声心动图、侵入性梯度以及手术或血管内指征的相关性的讨论有限。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入129例主动脉缩窄或再缩窄患者,均行临床、超声心动图、导管插管和CT血管造影检查。中弓发育不全和动脉导管未闭的患者被排除在研究之外。采用CT血管造影,对主动脉峡部和膈主动脉进行详细测量,包括峡部与膈部的比值、体表面积指数测量和z分数。结果:多个参数与超声心动图及有创梯度呈中高相关性。显著侵入梯度(>20 mmHg)的最佳鉴别指标是小儿心脏网络的液压直径z-评分(受试者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.869),而干预的最佳预测指标是所有测量的最小直径底特律z-评分(P 0.9)。结论:CT血管造影峡膈面积比是一种简单、准确、可靠的评估主动脉缩窄和再缩严重程度的方法。这些发现支持了它在临床决策中的应用,并提出了标准化方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信