A retrospective analysis of patients eligible for organ donation in adult intensive care units in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lydia Shim, Cynthia J Wensley, Rachael L Parke
{"title":"A retrospective analysis of patients eligible for organ donation in adult intensive care units in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Lydia Shim, Cynthia J Wensley, Rachael L Parke","doi":"10.1177/0310057X251357317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyse characteristics of patients eligible for organ donation in New Zealand (NZ) Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and identify potentially modifiable factors that may benefit donation conversations and their outcomes. Design: A retrospective analysis of eligible patient data collected by Organ Donation New Zealand (ODNZ). Twenty-three adult ICUs in NZ from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Participants: Adult ICU patients eligible for organ donation via neurological determination of death (DNDD) or circulatory determination of death (DCDD). Patient and ICU characteristics, preparations for donation conversations, donation decisions, and reasons for non-approaches or declines were analysed. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression evaluated factors and outcomes. A total of 1,267 cases were analysed (DNDD = 687, DCDD = 580). Donation conversations occurred in 46.9% of cases, with 51.3% resulting in consent. Patients' demographics and admission trends were similar to international reports. Male gender (p = 0.016) and ICU length of stay (p = 0.003) were associated with increased DCDD consent likelihood. Conditions such as encephalopathy (p = 0.012), and cardiovascular disease (p < 0.001) were associated with reduced donation conversation likelihood. Families of Māori patients were associated with reduced donation conversation likelihood (p = 0.002) and families of Māori (p < 0.001), Pasifika (p < 0.001), and Asian patients (p = 0.004) were associated with reduced consent likelihood. Early consultation with ODNZ and timely brain death confirmation positively impacted donation conversations and consent rates. Although not always practised, early ODNZ consultation and timely brain death confirmation were modifiable factors positively associated with conversations being approached and consent. Research exploring ICU staff and families' perspectives may improve understanding of influencing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X251357317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251357317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyse characteristics of patients eligible for organ donation in New Zealand (NZ) Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and identify potentially modifiable factors that may benefit donation conversations and their outcomes. Design: A retrospective analysis of eligible patient data collected by Organ Donation New Zealand (ODNZ). Twenty-three adult ICUs in NZ from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Participants: Adult ICU patients eligible for organ donation via neurological determination of death (DNDD) or circulatory determination of death (DCDD). Patient and ICU characteristics, preparations for donation conversations, donation decisions, and reasons for non-approaches or declines were analysed. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression evaluated factors and outcomes. A total of 1,267 cases were analysed (DNDD = 687, DCDD = 580). Donation conversations occurred in 46.9% of cases, with 51.3% resulting in consent. Patients' demographics and admission trends were similar to international reports. Male gender (p = 0.016) and ICU length of stay (p = 0.003) were associated with increased DCDD consent likelihood. Conditions such as encephalopathy (p = 0.012), and cardiovascular disease (p < 0.001) were associated with reduced donation conversation likelihood. Families of Māori patients were associated with reduced donation conversation likelihood (p = 0.002) and families of Māori (p < 0.001), Pasifika (p < 0.001), and Asian patients (p = 0.004) were associated with reduced consent likelihood. Early consultation with ODNZ and timely brain death confirmation positively impacted donation conversations and consent rates. Although not always practised, early ODNZ consultation and timely brain death confirmation were modifiable factors positively associated with conversations being approached and consent. Research exploring ICU staff and families' perspectives may improve understanding of influencing factors.

对新西兰奥特罗阿成人重症监护病房符合器官捐献条件的患者进行回顾性分析。
分析新西兰(NZ)重症监护病房(icu)符合器官捐赠条件的患者特征,并确定可能有利于捐赠对话及其结果的潜在可修改因素。设计:对新西兰器官捐赠(ODNZ)收集的符合条件的患者数据进行回顾性分析。2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日,新西兰有23名成人icu。参与者:通过神经死亡测定(DNDD)或循环死亡测定(DCDD)符合器官捐献条件的成年ICU患者。分析了患者和ICU的特点、捐赠谈话的准备、捐赠决定以及不接近或拒绝的原因。描述性统计和二元逻辑回归评估因素和结果。共分析1267例(DNDD = 687, DCDD = 580)。46.9%的病例发生了捐赠对话,51.3%的病例同意捐赠。患者的人口统计和入院趋势与国际报告相似。男性性别(p = 0.016)和ICU住院时间(p = 0.003)与DCDD同意可能性增加相关。例如脑病(p = 0.012)和心血管疾病(p = 0.012)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信