Automatic Classification of Primary and Secondary Craters Near Copernicus Crater With Updated Insights on Its Impact Trajectory and Age

IF 4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Yiran Wang, Miao Zhuo, Bo Wu, Shuo Liu, Dijun Guo
{"title":"Automatic Classification of Primary and Secondary Craters Near Copernicus Crater With Updated Insights on Its Impact Trajectory and Age","authors":"Yiran Wang,&nbsp;Miao Zhuo,&nbsp;Bo Wu,&nbsp;Shuo Liu,&nbsp;Dijun Guo","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Impact cratering is the dominant geological process shaping the Moon's surface. Primary craters form from direct asteroid or comet impacts, while secondary craters are created by debris ejected from these primary impacts. Accurately identifying secondary craters within the primary crater population is essential for understanding planetary processes and surface ages. However, manually distinguishing these secondary craters can be time-consuming and challenging. In this work, a statistical analysis of 5,460 primary and secondary craters reveals significant differences in their spectral characteristics. These differences are postulated to originate from distinct degrees of modification to the target materials and weathering processes. Employing a deep learning model, the research specifically targets the Copernicus crater region to automate the identification of secondary craters. The model classified ∼285,000 secondary and ∼39,000 primary craters with diameters from 200 m to 5 km. Secondary craters make up 89% of the total at 200–280 m, decreasing to around 65% at 4,520–5,000 m. The azimuthal distribution of identified secondary craters suggests an oblique impact from southeast to northwest that formed the Copernicus crater. The model age, based on craters superposed on the ejecta, estimates the Copernicus crater to be ∼755 Ma, overlaying a 3.69 Ga surface. The estimated ages align with previous research. The method is best suited for geologically homogeneous, airless surfaces, and is limited when older primary craters are buried by later ejecta or when ancient craters exhibit similar spectral features due to degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impact cratering is the dominant geological process shaping the Moon's surface. Primary craters form from direct asteroid or comet impacts, while secondary craters are created by debris ejected from these primary impacts. Accurately identifying secondary craters within the primary crater population is essential for understanding planetary processes and surface ages. However, manually distinguishing these secondary craters can be time-consuming and challenging. In this work, a statistical analysis of 5,460 primary and secondary craters reveals significant differences in their spectral characteristics. These differences are postulated to originate from distinct degrees of modification to the target materials and weathering processes. Employing a deep learning model, the research specifically targets the Copernicus crater region to automate the identification of secondary craters. The model classified ∼285,000 secondary and ∼39,000 primary craters with diameters from 200 m to 5 km. Secondary craters make up 89% of the total at 200–280 m, decreasing to around 65% at 4,520–5,000 m. The azimuthal distribution of identified secondary craters suggests an oblique impact from southeast to northwest that formed the Copernicus crater. The model age, based on craters superposed on the ejecta, estimates the Copernicus crater to be ∼755 Ma, overlaying a 3.69 Ga surface. The estimated ages align with previous research. The method is best suited for geologically homogeneous, airless surfaces, and is limited when older primary craters are buried by later ejecta or when ancient craters exhibit similar spectral features due to degradation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哥白尼陨石坑附近主要和次要陨石坑的自动分类及其撞击轨迹和年龄的最新见解
撞击坑是形成月球表面的主要地质过程。主要陨石坑是由小行星或彗星直接撞击形成的,而次要陨石坑是由这些主要撞击产生的碎片形成的。在主要陨石坑群中准确识别次要陨石坑对于理解行星过程和表面年龄至关重要。然而,手动区分这些次要陨石坑既耗时又具有挑战性。在这项工作中,对5,460个主要和次要陨石坑进行了统计分析,揭示了它们的光谱特征的显着差异。这些差异被认为是由于目标材料的不同程度的改性和风化过程造成的。该研究采用深度学习模型,专门针对哥白尼陨石坑区域,以自动识别次要陨石坑。该模型分类了直径从200米到5公里的约28.5万个次级陨石坑和约3.9万个初级陨石坑。在海拔200-280米的地方,次级陨石坑占总数的89%,在海拔4520 - 5000米的地方,这一比例下降到65%左右。已确定的次生陨石坑的方位分布表明,哥白尼陨石坑是由东南向西北倾斜撞击形成的。模型的年龄,基于在喷射物上叠加的陨石坑,估计哥白尼陨石坑的年龄为~ 755 Ma,覆盖在3.69 Ga的表面上。估计的年龄与之前的研究一致。该方法最适合地质均匀、无空气的表面,但当较老的初级陨石坑被后来的喷出物掩埋,或当古老的陨石坑由于退化而表现出类似的光谱特征时,该方法就受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信