Validation of the English version of the Parkinson Anxiety Scale in two Canadian Parkinson’s disease samples

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joyce S.T. Lam , Kira N. Tosefsky , Xuyan Tang , Dylan Meng , Petra Uzelman , Fabricio Pio , Nicholas J. Ainsworth , Fidel Vila-Rodriguez , Andrew K. Howard , Silke Appel-Cresswell
{"title":"Validation of the English version of the Parkinson Anxiety Scale in two Canadian Parkinson’s disease samples","authors":"Joyce S.T. Lam ,&nbsp;Kira N. Tosefsky ,&nbsp;Xuyan Tang ,&nbsp;Dylan Meng ,&nbsp;Petra Uzelman ,&nbsp;Fabricio Pio ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Ainsworth ,&nbsp;Fidel Vila-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Howard ,&nbsp;Silke Appel-Cresswell","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The 12-item Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP). However, psychometric evidence supporting the English self-rated PAS remains largely limited to validation studies by the developers. This study aimed to reinforce validation of this scale through a comprehensive psychometric evaluation in PwP in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were drawn from two Canadian samples of 130 and 53 PwP, respectively, at a tertiary center. Acceptability, reliability, validity, and factor structure were assessed. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was administered to confirm anxiety diagnoses. Optimal cut-off scores suggesting the presence of an anxiety disorder were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PAS and its three subscales demonstrated good acceptability and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α &gt; 0.70). Good convergent validity with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and divergent validity with scales assessing other non-motor symptoms were obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.987; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.983; root mean square error of approximation = 0.083; standardized root mean square residual = 0.087). Optimal cut-off scores were 12.5 for the total PAS (area under the ROC curve = 0.81, sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.58), 8.5 for the persistent anxiety subscale, and 2.5 for the episodic anxiety and avoidance behavior subscales. Approximately 22 % of participants in the larger sample had a diagnosed anxiety disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The English self-rated PAS is a valid and reliable instrument for screening and assessing severity and dimensions of anxiety in PwP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259011252500091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The 12-item Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP). However, psychometric evidence supporting the English self-rated PAS remains largely limited to validation studies by the developers. This study aimed to reinforce validation of this scale through a comprehensive psychometric evaluation in PwP in Canada.

Methods

Data were drawn from two Canadian samples of 130 and 53 PwP, respectively, at a tertiary center. Acceptability, reliability, validity, and factor structure were assessed. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was administered to confirm anxiety diagnoses. Optimal cut-off scores suggesting the presence of an anxiety disorder were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The PAS and its three subscales demonstrated good acceptability and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α > 0.70). Good convergent validity with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and divergent validity with scales assessing other non-motor symptoms were obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.987; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.983; root mean square error of approximation = 0.083; standardized root mean square residual = 0.087). Optimal cut-off scores were 12.5 for the total PAS (area under the ROC curve = 0.81, sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.58), 8.5 for the persistent anxiety subscale, and 2.5 for the episodic anxiety and avoidance behavior subscales. Approximately 22 % of participants in the larger sample had a diagnosed anxiety disorder.

Conclusion

The English self-rated PAS is a valid and reliable instrument for screening and assessing severity and dimensions of anxiety in PwP.
帕金森焦虑量表英文版在两个加拿大帕金森病样本中的验证
12项帕金森焦虑量表(PAS)评估帕金森病患者(PwP)焦虑症状的严重程度。然而,支持英语自评PAS的心理测量学证据在很大程度上仍然局限于开发者的验证研究。本研究旨在通过对加拿大PwP患者进行全面的心理测量评估来加强该量表的有效性。方法数据分别取自加拿大某三级医疗中心的130和53个PwP样本。评估可接受性、信度、效度及因子结构。迷你国际神经精神病学访谈被用来确认焦虑症的诊断。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定提示存在焦虑障碍的最佳截止分数。结果PAS及其三个分量表具有良好的可接受性和内部一致性信度(Cronbach’s α >;0.70)。与状态-特质焦虑量表有较好的收敛效度,与其他非运动症状量表有较好的发散效度。验证性因子分析支持三因素结构(比较拟合指数= 0.987;Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.983;近似均方根误差= 0.083;标准化均方根残差= 0.087)。总PAS的最佳分值为12.5分(ROC曲线下面积= 0.81,敏感性= 0.89,特异性= 0.58),持续焦虑量表为8.5分,情景性焦虑和回避行为量表为2.5分。在更大的样本中,大约22%的参与者被诊断为焦虑症。结论英文自评PAS是一种有效、可靠的筛查和评估PwP患者焦虑程度和维度的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信