{"title":"Migrants in interethnic partnerships: Between preferences and structural opportunities","authors":"Anne-Kristin Kuhnt , Monika Obersneider","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the individual characteristics of migrants in interethnic partnerships living in Germany. Our analyses examine key characteristics extracted from the partner market theory and compare them among interethnic (migrant-native) and intraethnic (migrant-migrant) couples. This approach enables us to learn more about the role of cultural boundaries in the social integration processes of different migrant groups. We go beyond earlier research by focusing not on migrant-native contrasts but on variations within the migrant population, including a comparison of Turkish migrants and ethnic German resettlers, which are the two largest migrant groups in Germany; and by including religion, marital status, and spatial perspectives in our analyses. We also extend prior work by including non-marital partnerships. Our empirical analyses are based on migrant adults aged 14–48. In a first step, we present descriptive findings on the prevalence of interethnic partnerships in our sample. In a second step, we estimate the outcome variable (migrants in interethnic vs. intraethnic partnerships) using cross-sectional regression analyses. The models focus on compositional differences between immigrant groups concerning size and place of residence, education, migrant status, ethnicity, religiosity, sex, relationship status, and age. Our findings support the theoretical elaborations on interethnic partner markets, namely, that preferences and structural opportunities characterize migrants in interethnic partnerships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725001269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the individual characteristics of migrants in interethnic partnerships living in Germany. Our analyses examine key characteristics extracted from the partner market theory and compare them among interethnic (migrant-native) and intraethnic (migrant-migrant) couples. This approach enables us to learn more about the role of cultural boundaries in the social integration processes of different migrant groups. We go beyond earlier research by focusing not on migrant-native contrasts but on variations within the migrant population, including a comparison of Turkish migrants and ethnic German resettlers, which are the two largest migrant groups in Germany; and by including religion, marital status, and spatial perspectives in our analyses. We also extend prior work by including non-marital partnerships. Our empirical analyses are based on migrant adults aged 14–48. In a first step, we present descriptive findings on the prevalence of interethnic partnerships in our sample. In a second step, we estimate the outcome variable (migrants in interethnic vs. intraethnic partnerships) using cross-sectional regression analyses. The models focus on compositional differences between immigrant groups concerning size and place of residence, education, migrant status, ethnicity, religiosity, sex, relationship status, and age. Our findings support the theoretical elaborations on interethnic partner markets, namely, that preferences and structural opportunities characterize migrants in interethnic partnerships.
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.