Children’s voices in child welfare tribunal proceedings: documentation and weighting of children’s opinions on contact with biological parents after a care order

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Helle Karina Johansen , Stine Lehmann , Karl Harald Søvig , Ragnhild Bjørknes
{"title":"Children’s voices in child welfare tribunal proceedings: documentation and weighting of children’s opinions on contact with biological parents after a care order","authors":"Helle Karina Johansen ,&nbsp;Stine Lehmann ,&nbsp;Karl Harald Søvig ,&nbsp;Ragnhild Bjørknes","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to provide insights into children’s participation in care order proceedings by examining Norwegian Child Welfare Tribunal decisions from 2018 and 2021. We explored the frequency and form of children’s participation, the weight given to their opinions on contact frequency and the factors influencing these processes. We further examined how discrepancies between the child’s and the municipality’s opinions affected the tribunal’s decisions on contact frequency. Using a repeated cross-sectional design, we analysed 728 tribunal decisions that led to foster care placement. Our findings indicated that older children and girls’ opinions were given more weight, while the opinions of younger children and boys were de-emphasised. Additionally, children’s requests for higher contact frequency were associated with lower weight given to their opinions but higher actual contact frequency granted by the tribunal. We also found that greater discrepancy between the child‘s opinion and the child’s protection opinion, yielded lower contact frequency in the tribunal decision. These findings underscore the need for improved and developmentally sensitive methods to assess and document children’s voices and ensure their perspectives are genuinely considered in decision-making. Addressing these gaps is crucial for upholding children’s rights consistently and fairly in child protection cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 108534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925004177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to provide insights into children’s participation in care order proceedings by examining Norwegian Child Welfare Tribunal decisions from 2018 and 2021. We explored the frequency and form of children’s participation, the weight given to their opinions on contact frequency and the factors influencing these processes. We further examined how discrepancies between the child’s and the municipality’s opinions affected the tribunal’s decisions on contact frequency. Using a repeated cross-sectional design, we analysed 728 tribunal decisions that led to foster care placement. Our findings indicated that older children and girls’ opinions were given more weight, while the opinions of younger children and boys were de-emphasised. Additionally, children’s requests for higher contact frequency were associated with lower weight given to their opinions but higher actual contact frequency granted by the tribunal. We also found that greater discrepancy between the child‘s opinion and the child’s protection opinion, yielded lower contact frequency in the tribunal decision. These findings underscore the need for improved and developmentally sensitive methods to assess and document children’s voices and ensure their perspectives are genuinely considered in decision-making. Addressing these gaps is crucial for upholding children’s rights consistently and fairly in child protection cases.
儿童福利法庭程序中的儿童声音:照料令后儿童与亲生父母接触的意见的记录和权重
本研究旨在通过审查挪威儿童福利法庭2018年和2021年的裁决,为儿童参与看护令程序提供见解。我们探讨了儿童参与的频率和形式,他们对接触频率的意见的权重以及影响这些过程的因素。我们进一步研究了儿童和市政当局意见之间的差异如何影响法庭对接触频率的决定。使用重复的横断面设计,我们分析了导致寄养安置的728个法庭裁决。我们的研究结果表明,年龄较大的孩子和女孩的意见更受重视,而年龄较小的孩子和男孩的意见则不那么受重视。此外,儿童要求较高的接触频率与法庭给予其意见较低的权重但给予较高的实际接触频率有关。我们还发现,在法庭裁决中,儿童意见与儿童保护意见之间的差异越大,接触频率就越低。这些发现强调需要改进和发展敏感的方法来评估和记录儿童的声音,并确保他们的观点在决策中得到真正的考虑。解决这些差距对于在儿童保护案件中始终如一、公平地维护儿童权利至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信