Standardized Assessment Tool for Surgery Applicants Reduces Attrition and Improves Board Pass Rate.

IF 2.1
Susana Fortich, Jana E DeJesus, Jaclyn Dempsey, Jayant Radhakrishnan, Geetha L Radhakrishnan, Richard L Lu, Ravi S Radhakrishnan
{"title":"Standardized Assessment Tool for Surgery Applicants Reduces Attrition and Improves Board Pass Rate.","authors":"Susana Fortich, Jana E DeJesus, Jaclyn Dempsey, Jayant Radhakrishnan, Geetha L Radhakrishnan, Richard L Lu, Ravi S Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Define challenge: </strong>Review of applicants to surgery residency is difficult to standardize and is open to bias. In addition, proper assessment and identification can lead to improved retention and performance in residency.</p><p><strong>Tool description: </strong>We developed a standardized tool to assess applicants in a holistic manner and stratify them for ranking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Applicants were graded on a scale of 0 to 3 on the following characteristics: medical school, USMLE Step Score, class standing, letter writer rank, letter of recommendation content categories (knowledge base, work ethic/teamwork, technical skills), MSPE content, Awards, and other activities. The overall score from the assessment tool was used to determine which applicants were invited for an interview and, in addition to interview scoring, to stratify applicants for the final rank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2011 to 2017, a total of 60 residents were assessed and matched into the single ACGME-accredited general surgery residency program General Surgery Program by standard means. Prior to the utilization of this tool, the resident demographics were 58.3% men, 41.7% women, 58.3% under-represented in medicine (URM) with an 18.3% attrition rate, 5% remediation rate, and 64.3% first-time board pass rate. After the implementation of the assessment tool, a total of 38 residents were assessed and matched into the a single ACGME-accredited general surgery residency program from 2017 to 2023. The resident demographics were 57.9% men, 42.1% women, and 68.4% under-represented in medicine (URM), with a 7.9% attrition rate, 2.6% remediation rate, and 92.3% first-time board pass rate. The reduction in attrition rate and increase in first-time board pass rate between new and old methods was statistically significant (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized assessment of resident applicants can help improve the identification of residents who will be successful in residency and help improve diversity within the residents. Programs directors can adapt this framework to help prioritize the objective characteristics they would like in their incoming residents and to increase the chances of success in their programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":" ","pages":"103635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Define challenge: Review of applicants to surgery residency is difficult to standardize and is open to bias. In addition, proper assessment and identification can lead to improved retention and performance in residency.

Tool description: We developed a standardized tool to assess applicants in a holistic manner and stratify them for ranking.

Methods: Applicants were graded on a scale of 0 to 3 on the following characteristics: medical school, USMLE Step Score, class standing, letter writer rank, letter of recommendation content categories (knowledge base, work ethic/teamwork, technical skills), MSPE content, Awards, and other activities. The overall score from the assessment tool was used to determine which applicants were invited for an interview and, in addition to interview scoring, to stratify applicants for the final rank.

Results: From 2011 to 2017, a total of 60 residents were assessed and matched into the single ACGME-accredited general surgery residency program General Surgery Program by standard means. Prior to the utilization of this tool, the resident demographics were 58.3% men, 41.7% women, 58.3% under-represented in medicine (URM) with an 18.3% attrition rate, 5% remediation rate, and 64.3% first-time board pass rate. After the implementation of the assessment tool, a total of 38 residents were assessed and matched into the a single ACGME-accredited general surgery residency program from 2017 to 2023. The resident demographics were 57.9% men, 42.1% women, and 68.4% under-represented in medicine (URM), with a 7.9% attrition rate, 2.6% remediation rate, and 92.3% first-time board pass rate. The reduction in attrition rate and increase in first-time board pass rate between new and old methods was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Standardized assessment of resident applicants can help improve the identification of residents who will be successful in residency and help improve diversity within the residents. Programs directors can adapt this framework to help prioritize the objective characteristics they would like in their incoming residents and to increase the chances of success in their programs.

外科申请人标准化评估工具,减少人员流失,提高委员会通过率。
定义挑战:对外科住院医师申请人的审查很难标准化,并且容易存在偏见。此外,适当的评估和鉴定可以提高住院医师的留用率和表现。工具描述:我们开发了一个标准化的工具,以全面的方式评估申请人,并对他们进行分层排名。方法:根据以下特征对申请人进行0到3分的评分:医学院、USMLE步骤分数、班级排名、写信人排名、推荐信内容类别(知识基础、职业道德/团队合作、技术技能)、MSPE内容、奖项和其他活动。评估工具的总体得分被用来确定哪些申请人被邀请参加面试,除了面试得分外,还用于对申请人进行最终排名。结果:2011 - 2017年,共有60名住院医师通过标准手段被评估并匹配到单一的acgme认证的普外科住院医师项目general surgery program。在使用该工具之前,居民人口统计数据为58.3%的男性,41.7%的女性,58.3%的医学代表不足(URM), 18.3%的流失率,5%的补考率和64.3%的首次董事会通过率。在实施评估工具后,2017年至2023年,共有38名住院医师被评估并匹配到一个单一的acgme认证的普外科住院医师项目中。其中男性占57.9%,女性占42.1%,医学从业人员不足(URM)占68.4%,流失率为7.9%,补考率为2.6%,首次董事会通过率为92.3%。新方法和旧方法之间的流失率的降低和首次董事会通过率的增加具有统计学意义(p )。结论:对住院申请人的标准化评估有助于提高住院医师对成功住院医师的识别,并有助于改善住院医师内部的多样性。项目主管可以调整这一框架,以帮助优先考虑他们希望在新住院医生身上看到的客观特征,并增加项目成功的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信