Democratizing advanced surgical guidance: decoupling the state-of-the-art from tertiary centers and breaking trail for autonomous robotic surgery in austere environments.

Eric R Henderson, David H Gracias, Venkat M Ramakrishnan, Stas Tiomkin, Juan P Wachs, Daniel A Wollin
{"title":"Democratizing advanced surgical guidance: decoupling the state-of-the-art from tertiary centers and breaking trail for autonomous robotic surgery in austere environments.","authors":"Eric R Henderson, David H Gracias, Venkat M Ramakrishnan, Stas Tiomkin, Juan P Wachs, Daniel A Wollin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgery involves iterative identification of anatomical structures and intervention upon them. In recent years, machine-based tissue recognition has advanced substantially, enhancing the safety and efficacy of medical procedures by reducing uncertainty about structure identity through quantitative evaluation (e.g., tissue density, optical properties, fluorescence contrast). However, while tissue-identifying tools have progressed rapidly, the development of intervention tools has lagged. It is worth considering the eventual convergence of these technologies at their mature stage, culminating in autonomous robotic surgery (ARS). Beyond technical feasibility, deploying such a groundbreaking technology requires careful consideration. Typically, expensive and novel medical advancements are introduced in tertiary academic medical centers, where state-of-the-art infrastructure and trained personnel are available. However, ARS holds the greatest potential for regions lacking access to surgeons, making it crucial to define the optimal scenarios for its implementation. The technical demands of ARS will vary significantly depending on the type of procedure. Decision-making should prioritize a focused set of surgery-requiring conditions and assess the cumulative risk profile of offering ARS in regions with no existing treatment options. Key factors in this evaluation include: 1) procedure commonness; 2) ARS feasibility with current technology; 3) risk of adverse events from a robotic intervention; 4) procedure urgency (i.e., risk of no intervention); 5) risk of abandoning procedure in the setting of technical failure; 6) ability to have remote human oversight; and 7) current availability of resources in the target population/region. Based on these considerations, the initial stabilization of high-energy open skeletal trauma-particularly in active combat military settings-represents a highly feasible and valuable early application. Additionally, the future development of self-sufficient microrobots capable of operating without external imaging could further enhance the portability and accessibility of ARS as the technology matures.</p>","PeriodicalId":74505,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","volume":"13301 ","pages":"48-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgery involves iterative identification of anatomical structures and intervention upon them. In recent years, machine-based tissue recognition has advanced substantially, enhancing the safety and efficacy of medical procedures by reducing uncertainty about structure identity through quantitative evaluation (e.g., tissue density, optical properties, fluorescence contrast). However, while tissue-identifying tools have progressed rapidly, the development of intervention tools has lagged. It is worth considering the eventual convergence of these technologies at their mature stage, culminating in autonomous robotic surgery (ARS). Beyond technical feasibility, deploying such a groundbreaking technology requires careful consideration. Typically, expensive and novel medical advancements are introduced in tertiary academic medical centers, where state-of-the-art infrastructure and trained personnel are available. However, ARS holds the greatest potential for regions lacking access to surgeons, making it crucial to define the optimal scenarios for its implementation. The technical demands of ARS will vary significantly depending on the type of procedure. Decision-making should prioritize a focused set of surgery-requiring conditions and assess the cumulative risk profile of offering ARS in regions with no existing treatment options. Key factors in this evaluation include: 1) procedure commonness; 2) ARS feasibility with current technology; 3) risk of adverse events from a robotic intervention; 4) procedure urgency (i.e., risk of no intervention); 5) risk of abandoning procedure in the setting of technical failure; 6) ability to have remote human oversight; and 7) current availability of resources in the target population/region. Based on these considerations, the initial stabilization of high-energy open skeletal trauma-particularly in active combat military settings-represents a highly feasible and valuable early application. Additionally, the future development of self-sufficient microrobots capable of operating without external imaging could further enhance the portability and accessibility of ARS as the technology matures.

先进手术指导的民主化:将最先进的技术与第三级中心分离,为在严峻环境下进行自主机器人手术开辟道路。
外科手术涉及反复识别解剖结构并对其进行干预。近年来,基于机器的组织识别取得了长足的进步,通过定量评估(如组织密度、光学性质、荧光对比度)减少结构识别的不确定性,提高了医疗程序的安全性和有效性。然而,虽然组织识别工具进展迅速,但干预工具的发展却滞后。值得考虑的是,这些技术在其成熟阶段的最终融合,最终达到自主机器人手术(ARS)。除了技术可行性之外,部署这种突破性技术还需要仔细考虑。通常,昂贵和新颖的医学进步是在高等学术医疗中心引进的,那里有最先进的基础设施和训练有素的人员。然而,ARS在缺乏外科医生的地区具有最大的潜力,因此确定其实施的最佳方案至关重要。根据手术类型的不同,ARS的技术要求会有很大的不同。决策时应优先考虑一组需要手术的情况,并评估在没有现有治疗选择的地区提供ARS的累积风险概况。评价的关键因素包括:1)程序共性;2)当前技术下ARS的可行性;3)机器人干预的不良事件风险;4)程序紧迫性(即无干预风险);5)发生技术故障时放弃程序的风险;6)远程人工监督的能力;7)目标人群/地区目前的资源可用性。基于这些考虑,高能量开放性骨骼创伤的初始稳定-特别是在积极的战斗军事环境中-代表了一个高度可行和有价值的早期应用。此外,随着技术的成熟,能够在没有外部成像的情况下操作的自给自足微型机器人的未来发展可以进一步提高ARS的可移植性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信