Measurement-based care implementation by K-12 public school clinicians: A mixed-methods proof of concept study.

IF 2.6
Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895251363416
Elizabeth H Connors, Sophia Selino, Daniel Almirall, Nicolina Fusco, Jacob K Tebes
{"title":"Measurement-based care implementation by K-12 public school clinicians: A mixed-methods proof of concept study.","authors":"Elizabeth H Connors, Sophia Selino, Daniel Almirall, Nicolina Fusco, Jacob K Tebes","doi":"10.1177/26334895251363416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel, multi-component implementation strategy for measurement-based care (MBC) called Feedback and Outcomes for Clinically Useful Student Services (FOCUSS). FOCUSS includes six components selected in our prior work with a national sample of school mental health stakeholders. This is among the first demonstrations of MBC with school-employed clinicians. We explored proof of concept by observing MBC adoption rates achieved by the end of the school year and other related implementation outcome data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-method, single-arm pilot study was conducted during one academic year with 10 school-employed mental health clinicians in two K-12 public school districts in Connecticut. Clinician adoption was assessed by monthly fidelity monitoring of measures clinicians entered in the feedback system. Clinician self-reported practices, attitudes, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using MBC with K-12 students was assessed by pre-training, 3-, 6-, and 9-month surveys. School year-end qualitative interviews explored clinician implementation experiences using MBC and FOCUSS implementation supports to inform future changes to FOCUSS in a district-wide trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians were asked to implement MBC with five students; 60% of the clinicians achieved or exceeded this target, and MBC was adopted with 65 students. Other implementation outcomes were comparable to related studies. Qualitative feedback indicated that MBC is clinically valuable in schools by providing consistency and structure to sessions, is compatible with school mental health, and well regarded by students and parents. FOCUSS implementation supports were regarded as helpful, and individual performance feedback emails appeared to be a necessary component of FOCUSS to boost post-training implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is among the first studies of MBC implementation with school-employed mental health professionals in the United States. Results demonstrate proof of concept for MBC implementation with school social workers, psychologists and counselors and support subsequent district-wide use of FOCUSS to install MBC in schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"6 ","pages":"26334895251363416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895251363416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel, multi-component implementation strategy for measurement-based care (MBC) called Feedback and Outcomes for Clinically Useful Student Services (FOCUSS). FOCUSS includes six components selected in our prior work with a national sample of school mental health stakeholders. This is among the first demonstrations of MBC with school-employed clinicians. We explored proof of concept by observing MBC adoption rates achieved by the end of the school year and other related implementation outcome data.

Method: A mixed-method, single-arm pilot study was conducted during one academic year with 10 school-employed mental health clinicians in two K-12 public school districts in Connecticut. Clinician adoption was assessed by monthly fidelity monitoring of measures clinicians entered in the feedback system. Clinician self-reported practices, attitudes, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using MBC with K-12 students was assessed by pre-training, 3-, 6-, and 9-month surveys. School year-end qualitative interviews explored clinician implementation experiences using MBC and FOCUSS implementation supports to inform future changes to FOCUSS in a district-wide trial.

Results: Clinicians were asked to implement MBC with five students; 60% of the clinicians achieved or exceeded this target, and MBC was adopted with 65 students. Other implementation outcomes were comparable to related studies. Qualitative feedback indicated that MBC is clinically valuable in schools by providing consistency and structure to sessions, is compatible with school mental health, and well regarded by students and parents. FOCUSS implementation supports were regarded as helpful, and individual performance feedback emails appeared to be a necessary component of FOCUSS to boost post-training implementation.

Conclusion: This is among the first studies of MBC implementation with school-employed mental health professionals in the United States. Results demonstrate proof of concept for MBC implementation with school social workers, psychologists and counselors and support subsequent district-wide use of FOCUSS to install MBC in schools.

K-12公立学校临床医生基于测量的护理实施:一项混合方法的概念验证研究。
背景:本研究评估了一种名为“临床有用学生服务反馈与结果”(focus)的基于测量的护理(MBC)多层次、多成分实施策略的可行性和可接受性。重点包括六个组成部分,选择在我们之前的工作与学校心理健康利益相关者的国家样本。这是学校聘用的临床医生首次示范MBC。我们通过观察学年结束时达到的MBC采用率和其他相关实施结果数据来探索概念的证明。方法:在康涅狄格州两个K-12公立学区的10名学校雇佣的心理健康临床医生进行了一项为期一学年的混合方法单臂试点研究。通过每月对临床医生在反馈系统中输入的措施进行保真度监测来评估临床医生的采用情况。通过训练前、3个月、6个月和9个月的调查来评估临床医生自我报告的做法、态度、可行性、可接受性和对K-12学生使用MBC的适当性。学校年终定性访谈探讨了临床医生使用MBC和focus实施支持的实施经验,以便在一个地区范围的试验中为focus的未来变化提供信息。结果:要求临床医生对5名学生实施MBC;60%的临床医生达到或超过了这一目标,65名学生采用了MBC。其他实施结果与相关研究相当。定性反馈表明,MBC在学校具有临床价值,提供了一致性和结构的课程,与学校心理健康相一致,受到学生和家长的好评。对重点项目实施的支持被认为是有益的,个人绩效反馈电子邮件似乎是重点项目促进培训后实施的必要组成部分。结论:这是美国学校聘用的心理健康专业人员实施MBC的首批研究之一。结果证明了学校社会工作者、心理学家和辅导员实施MBC的概念,并支持随后在全区范围内使用focus在学校安装MBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信