Interactive Book Reading to Accelerate Word Learning by Kindergarten Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Incorporating Retrieval-Based Practice Into Training.
IF 2.9 3区 医学Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Katherine R Gordon, Danielle Moss, Rebecca E Swinburne Romine, Kandace K Fleming, Holly L Storkel
{"title":"Interactive Book Reading to Accelerate Word Learning by Kindergarten Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Incorporating Retrieval-Based Practice Into Training.","authors":"Katherine R Gordon, Danielle Moss, Rebecca E Swinburne Romine, Kandace K Fleming, Holly L Storkel","doi":"10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laboratory-based word learning research demonstrates that retrieval-based practice supports learning and retention more than passive training strategies. The goal of the current study was to determine whether incorporating retrieval-based practice into an interactive book reading intervention contributed to better learning and retention for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) than a more passive version.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Kindergarten children with DLD (<i>N</i> = 37) completed the intervention administered twice a week for a total of 15 sessions. The between-participants conditions varied in the proportion of retrieval opportunities (high, mid, low). Learning of word forms and meanings were assessed throughout training, immediately after training, and after 4-, 8-, and 12-week delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of retrieval opportunities did not relate to learning or retention. Children who started the intervention with more language knowledge and skills produced more forms and meanings correctly during and after treatment. Few factors related to the learning and forgetting rates. Maternal education related positively to learning rate of forms. Children who produced more definitions during training and females, as opposed to males, demonstrated a shallower forgetting rate of definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the more passive version and the retrieval-based version of the intervention were effective to support word learning in children with DLD. Overall, pretreatment characteristics did not provide a good indication of children's learning rate or posttraining forgetting rate. Thus, it is likely that frequent assessments during training are the best indicator of intervention effectiveness for a given child. Additionally, retention should be periodically assessed post-intervention to monitor forgetting.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29696552.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"1110-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Laboratory-based word learning research demonstrates that retrieval-based practice supports learning and retention more than passive training strategies. The goal of the current study was to determine whether incorporating retrieval-based practice into an interactive book reading intervention contributed to better learning and retention for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) than a more passive version.
Method: Kindergarten children with DLD (N = 37) completed the intervention administered twice a week for a total of 15 sessions. The between-participants conditions varied in the proportion of retrieval opportunities (high, mid, low). Learning of word forms and meanings were assessed throughout training, immediately after training, and after 4-, 8-, and 12-week delays.
Results: The proportion of retrieval opportunities did not relate to learning or retention. Children who started the intervention with more language knowledge and skills produced more forms and meanings correctly during and after treatment. Few factors related to the learning and forgetting rates. Maternal education related positively to learning rate of forms. Children who produced more definitions during training and females, as opposed to males, demonstrated a shallower forgetting rate of definitions.
Conclusions: Both the more passive version and the retrieval-based version of the intervention were effective to support word learning in children with DLD. Overall, pretreatment characteristics did not provide a good indication of children's learning rate or posttraining forgetting rate. Thus, it is likely that frequent assessments during training are the best indicator of intervention effectiveness for a given child. Additionally, retention should be periodically assessed post-intervention to monitor forgetting.
期刊介绍：
Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
