Sharynne McLeod, Carolyn Gregoric, Jessamy Davies, Lysa Dealtry, Laura Delli-Pizzi, Belinda Downey, Sheena Elwick, Suzanne C Hopf, Nicola Ivory, Holly McAlister, Elizabeth Murray, Azizur Rahman, Shukla Sikder, Van H Tran, Cherie Zischke
{"title":"Children Draw Talking Around the World.","authors":"Sharynne McLeod, Carolyn Gregoric, Jessamy Davies, Lysa Dealtry, Laura Delli-Pizzi, Belinda Downey, Sheena Elwick, Suzanne C Hopf, Nicola Ivory, Holly McAlister, Elizabeth Murray, Azizur Rahman, Shukla Sikder, Van H Tran, Cherie Zischke","doi":"10.1044/2025_LSHSS-23-00190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine how children from across the world draw themselves talking and to apply an interdisciplinary analysis to understand children's perspectives to improve delivery of services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 200 children from 24 countries who submitted a drawing of themselves talking to someone using the Early Childhood Voices Drawing Protocol. Drawings were uploaded to Charles Sturt University's Children Draw Talking Global Online Gallery. The participants were 2-12 years old (<i>M</i> = 6.13) and spoke 23 languages, and 28.5% of caregivers reported concerns about their children's talking. A 16-member interdisciplinary research team analyzed the drawings using descriptive, developmental, focal point, meaning-making, and systemic functional linguistics transitivity analysis frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children could draw themselves talking. The participants' age and ability to draw a human figure were strongly correlated. Most participants reported they felt happy about talking and drew themselves talking to one or more conversational partners, with focal points that included body parts and facial expressions, talking and listening, proximity to others, relationships and connections, and positivity and vibrancy. The cultural-historical meaning-making analysis identified 10 themes: relationships, places, actions, natural elements, human-made elements, cultural experiences, logical thinking, emotion, imagination, and concepts. The systemic functional linguistics transitivity analysis identified 71 processes, 134 participants, and 48 circumstances indicating richness in the children's depictions of talking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children across the world can use drawing to communicate who they talk to (e.g., friends, family, animals, professionals), when and where they talk (e.g., outside, at home), what they talk about (e.g., toys, animals, friends, family), and how they feel about talking (e.g., happy). These insights promote understanding of children's communication and inform how children's insights can be included in assessment and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"1088-1109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-23-00190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how children from across the world draw themselves talking and to apply an interdisciplinary analysis to understand children's perspectives to improve delivery of services.
Method: Participants were 200 children from 24 countries who submitted a drawing of themselves talking to someone using the Early Childhood Voices Drawing Protocol. Drawings were uploaded to Charles Sturt University's Children Draw Talking Global Online Gallery. The participants were 2-12 years old (M = 6.13) and spoke 23 languages, and 28.5% of caregivers reported concerns about their children's talking. A 16-member interdisciplinary research team analyzed the drawings using descriptive, developmental, focal point, meaning-making, and systemic functional linguistics transitivity analysis frameworks.
Results: Children could draw themselves talking. The participants' age and ability to draw a human figure were strongly correlated. Most participants reported they felt happy about talking and drew themselves talking to one or more conversational partners, with focal points that included body parts and facial expressions, talking and listening, proximity to others, relationships and connections, and positivity and vibrancy. The cultural-historical meaning-making analysis identified 10 themes: relationships, places, actions, natural elements, human-made elements, cultural experiences, logical thinking, emotion, imagination, and concepts. The systemic functional linguistics transitivity analysis identified 71 processes, 134 participants, and 48 circumstances indicating richness in the children's depictions of talking.
Conclusions: Children across the world can use drawing to communicate who they talk to (e.g., friends, family, animals, professionals), when and where they talk (e.g., outside, at home), what they talk about (e.g., toys, animals, friends, family), and how they feel about talking (e.g., happy). These insights promote understanding of children's communication and inform how children's insights can be included in assessment and intervention.
期刊介绍:
Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.