Interspecific effects of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) on native nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus).

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Journal of Mammalogy Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf023
Matthew S Broadway, Holly M Todaro, Molly M Koeck, Courtney N Dotterweich, Sarah A Cain, Lindsey Buehler, M Colter Chitwood, Robert C Lonsinger
{"title":"Interspecific effects of invasive wild pigs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) on native nine-banded armadillos (<i>Dasypus novemcinctus</i>).","authors":"Matthew S Broadway, Holly M Todaro, Molly M Koeck, Courtney N Dotterweich, Sarah A Cain, Lindsey Buehler, M Colter Chitwood, Robert C Lonsinger","doi":"10.1093/jmammal/gyaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological invasions pose significant risks to ecosystems and native species. Wild pigs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) are a highly detrimental invasive species in North America, directly and indirectly affecting native species. Co-occurrence of wild pigs and native species may lead to interspecific interactions that alter ecological communities. Accordingly, we investigated spatial and temporal factors influencing detection and occupancy of Eurasian Wild Pig and Nine-banded Armadillo (<i>Dasypus novemcinctus</i>) before examining interspecific effects. We analyzed camera-trap data collected from August to September 2021 using a hierarchical modeling framework to estimate detection and occupancy of both species individually (single-species analyses) and concurrently (conditional co-occurrence analyses). We observed higher Wild Pig detection rates and space use in late summer and in areas with greater riparian cover, respectively. Armadillo detection increased linearly throughout our sampling season and in response to precipitation. Moreover, armadillo detection was 3.5 to 5.1× higher at sites used by wild pigs, regardless of whether wild pigs were detected during a survey period. Occupancy of armadillo was best explained by a quadratic trend in site elevation but did not depend on the presence of wild pigs. Our results indicate that wild pigs may influence armadillo detection (or site-use intensity), but not occupancy, therefore revealing nuanced interspecific interactions. Between species, we observed high overlap in diel activity but significantly different activity peaks, with armadillos being strictly nocturnal and wild pigs being crepuscular but with more cathemeral activity, suggesting that fine-scale temporal partitioning may have occurred. Our results provide insights into the influence of a large-bodied and destructive invasive species (Wild Pig) on a smaller, ecologically important native species (Nine-banded Armadillo).</p>","PeriodicalId":50157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mammalogy","volume":"106 4","pages":"976-988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mammalogy","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaf023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological invasions pose significant risks to ecosystems and native species. Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are a highly detrimental invasive species in North America, directly and indirectly affecting native species. Co-occurrence of wild pigs and native species may lead to interspecific interactions that alter ecological communities. Accordingly, we investigated spatial and temporal factors influencing detection and occupancy of Eurasian Wild Pig and Nine-banded Armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) before examining interspecific effects. We analyzed camera-trap data collected from August to September 2021 using a hierarchical modeling framework to estimate detection and occupancy of both species individually (single-species analyses) and concurrently (conditional co-occurrence analyses). We observed higher Wild Pig detection rates and space use in late summer and in areas with greater riparian cover, respectively. Armadillo detection increased linearly throughout our sampling season and in response to precipitation. Moreover, armadillo detection was 3.5 to 5.1× higher at sites used by wild pigs, regardless of whether wild pigs were detected during a survey period. Occupancy of armadillo was best explained by a quadratic trend in site elevation but did not depend on the presence of wild pigs. Our results indicate that wild pigs may influence armadillo detection (or site-use intensity), but not occupancy, therefore revealing nuanced interspecific interactions. Between species, we observed high overlap in diel activity but significantly different activity peaks, with armadillos being strictly nocturnal and wild pigs being crepuscular but with more cathemeral activity, suggesting that fine-scale temporal partitioning may have occurred. Our results provide insights into the influence of a large-bodied and destructive invasive species (Wild Pig) on a smaller, ecologically important native species (Nine-banded Armadillo).

入侵野猪对本地九带犰狳的种间效应。
生物入侵对生态系统和本地物种构成重大威胁。野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种非常有害的入侵物种,直接或间接地影响北美本地物种。野猪和本地物种的共存可能导致种间相互作用,从而改变生态群落。因此,我们研究了欧亚野猪和九带犰狳(Dasypus novemcintus)探测和占用的时空因素,然后研究了种间效应。我们使用分层建模框架分析了2021年8月至9月收集的相机陷阱数据,以估计单独(单物种分析)和并发(条件共现分析)两种物种的检测和占用情况。我们观察到,在夏末和河岸覆盖面积较大的地区,野猪的检出率和空间利用率分别较高。犰狳检测在整个采样季节和降水响应中呈线性增加。此外,无论在调查期间是否检测到野猪,在野猪使用的地点,犰狳的检出率高出3.5至5.1倍。犰狳的占据最好的解释是场地海拔的二次趋势,但不依赖于野猪的存在。我们的研究结果表明,野猪可能会影响犰狳的检测(或场地使用强度),但不会影响占用,因此揭示了微妙的种间相互作用。在不同物种之间,我们观察到昼夜活动高度重叠,但活动峰值明显不同,犰狳是严格的夜间活动,而野猪是黄昏活动,但有更多的导管活动,这表明可能发生了精细尺度的时间划分。我们的研究结果揭示了大型破坏性入侵物种(野猪)对小型生态重要本地物种(九带犰狳)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mammalogy
Journal of Mammalogy 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Papers are published on mammalian behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, physiology, and taxonomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信