Parameter estimation analysis of the glioblastoma immune model.

IF 0.7 4区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Biao Liu, Mengru Shen, Meiling Zhao
{"title":"Parameter estimation analysis of the glioblastoma immune model.","authors":"Biao Liu, Mengru Shen, Meiling Zhao","doi":"10.1142/S0219720025500088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In exploring optimal strategies for immunotherapy in glioblastoma (GBM), one of the main challenges is enhancing treatment response. To better understand the dynamics of tumor-immune interactions, one applied Bayesian methods to estimate the parameters of glioblastoma immune model by using experimental data. One compared the effects of using uniform prior distributions versus improved prior distributions, which were adjusted based on posterior information, during parameter estimation. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained by using four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithms which respectively are Metropolis, DEMetropolis, DEMetropolisZ and NUTS, were performed. The results showed that the improved prior distribution significantly enhanced the accuracy of the model parameter estimates, and reduced the variance of the posterior distribution, but increased computational time and resource demands. Furthermore, DEMetropolisZ provided such efficient sampling and narrower confidence intervals within a shorter time frame, which outperformed the others. In contrast, the efficiency and stability of the Metropolis method were relatively poor. Therefore, the importance of selecting appropriate prior distributions and sampling algorithms to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of model inference were studied. The study provides valuable insights for optimizing GBM immunotherapy strategies and serves as a reference for modeling and parameter estimation of complex biological systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","volume":"23 4","pages":"2550008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219720025500088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In exploring optimal strategies for immunotherapy in glioblastoma (GBM), one of the main challenges is enhancing treatment response. To better understand the dynamics of tumor-immune interactions, one applied Bayesian methods to estimate the parameters of glioblastoma immune model by using experimental data. One compared the effects of using uniform prior distributions versus improved prior distributions, which were adjusted based on posterior information, during parameter estimation. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained by using four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithms which respectively are Metropolis, DEMetropolis, DEMetropolisZ and NUTS, were performed. The results showed that the improved prior distribution significantly enhanced the accuracy of the model parameter estimates, and reduced the variance of the posterior distribution, but increased computational time and resource demands. Furthermore, DEMetropolisZ provided such efficient sampling and narrower confidence intervals within a shorter time frame, which outperformed the others. In contrast, the efficiency and stability of the Metropolis method were relatively poor. Therefore, the importance of selecting appropriate prior distributions and sampling algorithms to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of model inference were studied. The study provides valuable insights for optimizing GBM immunotherapy strategies and serves as a reference for modeling and parameter estimation of complex biological systems.

胶质母细胞瘤免疫模型参数估计分析。
在探索胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)免疫治疗的最佳策略时,主要挑战之一是提高治疗反应。为了更好地了解肿瘤-免疫相互作用的动力学,利用实验数据,应用贝叶斯方法估计胶质母细胞瘤免疫模型的参数。其中一项比较了均匀先验分布与改进先验分布的效果,后者在参数估计期间根据后验信息进行调整。此外,还对Metropolis、DEMetropolis、DEMetropolisZ和NUTS四种Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)采样算法的结果进行了对比分析。结果表明,改进后的先验分布显著提高了模型参数估计的准确性,减小了后验分布的方差,但增加了计算时间和资源需求。此外,DEMetropolisZ在更短的时间框架内提供了如此高效的采样和更窄的置信区间,优于其他方法。相比之下,Metropolis方法的效率和稳定性相对较差。因此,研究了选择合适的先验分布和采样算法对提高模型推理的准确性和效率的重要性。该研究为优化GBM免疫治疗策略提供了有价值的见解,并为复杂生物系统的建模和参数估计提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology aims to publish high quality, original research articles, expository tutorial papers and review papers as well as short, critical comments on technical issues associated with the analysis of cellular information. The research papers will be technical presentations of new assertions, discoveries and tools, intended for a narrower specialist community. The tutorials, reviews and critical commentary will be targeted at a broader readership of biologists who are interested in using computers but are not knowledgeable about scientific computing, and equally, computer scientists who have an interest in biology but are not familiar with current thrusts nor the language of biology. Such carefully chosen tutorials and articles should greatly accelerate the rate of entry of these new creative scientists into the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信