Development and Impact of a Specialist Formulation Tool Piloted in the OPD Women's Pathway.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Katie Minnett, Caitriona Higgins, Sharlene Akinyemi, Philip Minoudis, Emily Turton
{"title":"Development and Impact of a Specialist Formulation Tool Piloted in the OPD Women's Pathway.","authors":"Katie Minnett, Caitriona Higgins, Sharlene Akinyemi, Philip Minoudis, Emily Turton","doi":"10.1002/cbm.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This was an evaluation of the quality of formulations for women within a community offender personality disorder pathway (OPDP) service. The evaluation was conducted following the delivery of a bespoke 'formulating females who offend' training event using a bespoke gender-responsive audit tool.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this evaluation were to use and review a bespoke gender-specific formulation audit tool and to evaluate the impact of a formulation training package on the quality of formulations and referral rates for women in the OPD pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A training day was held for a range of professionals working within the OPD women's pathway. Professionals were requested to submit formulations they had completed prior to the training day and following the training day. Data was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between women with a formulation and those without a formulation on number of referrals to relevant services. However, formulation audit scores showed no significant differences scores pre and post training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation successfully utilised a gender-specific formulation audit tool for women who have offended. Use of formulation increased referrals, which has the potential to improve wellbeing and reduce risk for complex women in the criminal justice system. There was no significant improvement in the quality of formulations written after attendance at a training event. The authors provide suggestions for a future evaluation to improve the audit tool by establishing a threshold for adequacy. Recommendations are made to improve staff skills in formulation by including a more extensive development package.</p>","PeriodicalId":47362,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This was an evaluation of the quality of formulations for women within a community offender personality disorder pathway (OPDP) service. The evaluation was conducted following the delivery of a bespoke 'formulating females who offend' training event using a bespoke gender-responsive audit tool.

Aims: The aims of this evaluation were to use and review a bespoke gender-specific formulation audit tool and to evaluate the impact of a formulation training package on the quality of formulations and referral rates for women in the OPD pathway.

Methods: A training day was held for a range of professionals working within the OPD women's pathway. Professionals were requested to submit formulations they had completed prior to the training day and following the training day. Data was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: The results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between women with a formulation and those without a formulation on number of referrals to relevant services. However, formulation audit scores showed no significant differences scores pre and post training.

Conclusions: This evaluation successfully utilised a gender-specific formulation audit tool for women who have offended. Use of formulation increased referrals, which has the potential to improve wellbeing and reduce risk for complex women in the criminal justice system. There was no significant improvement in the quality of formulations written after attendance at a training event. The authors provide suggestions for a future evaluation to improve the audit tool by establishing a threshold for adequacy. Recommendations are made to improve staff skills in formulation by including a more extensive development package.

在门诊妇女途径试点的专家配方工具的发展和影响。
背景:这是对社区罪犯人格障碍途径(OPDP)服务中妇女配方质量的评估。评估是在使用定制的性别敏感审计工具进行定制的“冒犯的女性”培训活动之后进行的。目的:这次评价的目的是使用和审查一种针对性别的定制配方审计工具,并评价一套配方培训方案对配方质量和门诊途径妇女转诊率的影响。方法:培训日举行了一系列的专业人员工作在OPD妇女途径。请专业人员提交他们在培训日之前和培训日之后完成的表格。使用描述性和推断性统计对数据进行分析。结果:结果表明,有一个配方的妇女和那些没有配方的数量转介到相关服务有显著差异。而培训前后的配方审核得分差异不显著。结论:该评价成功地利用了针对冒犯妇女的特定性别配方审计工具。配方的使用增加了转诊,这有可能改善福利,减少复杂妇女在刑事司法系统中的风险。参加培训活动后编写的配方质量没有显著改善。作者为未来的评估提供了建议,通过建立充分性阈值来改进审计工具。建议包括更广泛的一揽子发展计划,以提高工作人员的拟订技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health – CBMH – aims to publish original material on any aspect of the relationship between mental state and criminal behaviour. Thus, we are interested in mental mechanisms associated with offending, regardless of whether the individual concerned has a mental disorder or not. We are interested in factors that influence such relationships, and particularly welcome studies about pathways into and out of crime. These will include studies of normal and abnormal development, of mental disorder and how that may lead to offending for a subgroup of sufferers, together with information about factors which mediate such a relationship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信