Global evidence on the effectiveness of task-shifting and task-sharing strategies for managing individuals with multimorbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Enying Gong, Yutong Long, Xunliang Tong, Wai Yan Min Htike, Jiahui Wang, Shiqi Ni, Yueqing Wang, Zijun Wang, Lijing L Yan, Sumit Kane, Ruitai Shao, Yanming Li
{"title":"Global evidence on the effectiveness of task-shifting and task-sharing strategies for managing individuals with multimorbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Enying Gong, Yutong Long, Xunliang Tong, Wai Yan Min Htike, Jiahui Wang, Shiqi Ni, Yueqing Wang, Zijun Wang, Lijing L Yan, Sumit Kane, Ruitai Shao, Yanming Li","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Task-shifting and task-sharing strategies show promise for managing chronic diseases especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), though their effectiveness in multimorbidity management remains unclear. This study synthesised evidence on task-shifting and task-sharing strategies globally and assessed the impact on core health outcomes in multimorbidity management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of global studies evaluating task-shifting and sharing interventions for individuals with multimorbidity. Six databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane Library, were searched for studies reporting the core outcomes of multimorbidity management in quality of life, mortality, hospitalisation, emergency department visits and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes with heterogeneity assessed through subgroup and meta-regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 8471 records, 36 studies from 14 countries were included, with only 5 conducted in LMICs. Twenty-one studies, encompassing 20 989 participants, were eligible for meta-analysis. More than half of the studies involved nurses as delegates, with some sharing the tasks with health professionals and about 10% of studies involved non-health professionals, including community healthcare workers as delegates to share the responsibility in caring for individuals with multimorbidity. Most studies were multicomponent, with 16.7% addressing all guideline-recommended aspects of multimorbidity management. By pooling the findings, task-shifting and task-sharing interventions were associated with a 27% reduction in mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.97, I²=0%), a modest improvement in quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.1, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.17, I²=47%) and reduced symptoms of depression (SMD: 0.27, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.02, I²=90%), but showed no significant effect on hospitalisation, emergency visits or anxiety-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some evidence, although limited in existing research, indicates the great potential of task-shifting and task-sharing strategies in supporting management of multimorbidity. Further research is needed to optimise and adopt these interventions, particularly in LMICs where evidence remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024526845.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Task-shifting and task-sharing strategies show promise for managing chronic diseases especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), though their effectiveness in multimorbidity management remains unclear. This study synthesised evidence on task-shifting and task-sharing strategies globally and assessed the impact on core health outcomes in multimorbidity management.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of global studies evaluating task-shifting and sharing interventions for individuals with multimorbidity. Six databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane Library, were searched for studies reporting the core outcomes of multimorbidity management in quality of life, mortality, hospitalisation, emergency department visits and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes with heterogeneity assessed through subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

Results: From 8471 records, 36 studies from 14 countries were included, with only 5 conducted in LMICs. Twenty-one studies, encompassing 20 989 participants, were eligible for meta-analysis. More than half of the studies involved nurses as delegates, with some sharing the tasks with health professionals and about 10% of studies involved non-health professionals, including community healthcare workers as delegates to share the responsibility in caring for individuals with multimorbidity. Most studies were multicomponent, with 16.7% addressing all guideline-recommended aspects of multimorbidity management. By pooling the findings, task-shifting and task-sharing interventions were associated with a 27% reduction in mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.97, I²=0%), a modest improvement in quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.1, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.17, I²=47%) and reduced symptoms of depression (SMD: 0.27, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.02, I²=90%), but showed no significant effect on hospitalisation, emergency visits or anxiety-related symptoms.

Conclusions: Some evidence, although limited in existing research, indicates the great potential of task-shifting and task-sharing strategies in supporting management of multimorbidity. Further research is needed to optimise and adopt these interventions, particularly in LMICs where evidence remains scarce.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024526845.

关于任务转移和任务共享策略对管理多重疾病个体有效性的全球证据:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
任务转移和任务分担策略在管理慢性病方面显示出希望,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),尽管它们在多病管理方面的有效性尚不清楚。本研究综合了全球范围内任务转移和任务共享策略的证据,并评估了多病管理对核心健康结果的影响。方法:我们对全球研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了多重疾病个体的任务转移和共享干预措施。6个数据库,包括PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL和Cochrane Library,检索了报告生活质量,死亡率,住院,急诊科就诊以及抑郁和焦虑症状等多病管理核心结果的研究。随机效应模型用于计算合并效应大小,并通过亚组和元回归分析评估异质性。结果:从8471份记录中,纳入了来自14个国家的36项研究,其中只有5项是在中低收入国家进行的。21项研究,包括20989名参与者,符合meta分析的条件。超过一半的研究涉及护士作为代表,其中一些与卫生专业人员分担任务,约10%的研究涉及非卫生专业人员,包括社区卫生保健工作者作为代表,分担照顾多重疾病患者的责任。大多数研究是多成分的,16.7%的研究涉及指南推荐的多病管理的所有方面。通过汇总研究结果,任务转移和任务分担干预与死亡率降低27% (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55至0.97,I²=0%)、生活质量适度改善(标准化平均差(SMD): 0.1, 95% CI: 0.03至0.17,I²=47%)和抑郁症状减轻(SMD: 0.27, 95% CI: -0.52至-0.02,I²=90%)相关,但对住院、急诊或焦虑相关症状没有显着影响。结论:一些证据,尽管在现有的研究中有限,表明任务转移和任务共享策略在支持多病管理方面具有巨大的潜力。需要进一步的研究来优化和采用这些干预措施,特别是在证据仍然缺乏的中低收入国家。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024526845。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信