Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: Rapid Review.

IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI:10.2196/69660
Mirella Veras, Louis-Pierre Auger, Jennifer Sigouin, Nahid Gheidari, Michelle LA Nelson, William C Miller, Anne Hudon, Dahlia Kairy
{"title":"Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: Rapid Review.","authors":"Mirella Veras, Louis-Pierre Auger, Jennifer Sigouin, Nahid Gheidari, Michelle LA Nelson, William C Miller, Anne Hudon, Dahlia Kairy","doi":"10.2196/69660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of technology in rehabilitation is transforming health care delivery for older adults, especially through telerehabilitation, which addresses barriers to in-person care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This rapid review explores the ethical and equity concerns associated with telerehabilitation for older adults, focusing on challenges such as internet access, technology adoption, and digital literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted according to Cochrane Rapid Review guidelines, this review used the Metaverse Equitable Rehabilitation Therapy framework, focusing on equity and ethics. Studies included telerehabilitation services for adults aged 55 years and older, published between 2010 and 2023. Screening was conducted independently by 2 researchers using Rayyan (Qatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University), with full-text review by additional team members. Searches were performed in Medline and CINAHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 323 papers retrieved, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023. Disparities in socioeconomic status, geographic location, and racial and ethnic backgrounds were found to impact telerehabilitation use. Additionally, ethical concerns around privacy, security, and autonomy were often inadequately addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review emphasizes the need for culturally appropriate, accessible, and inclusive telerehabilitation services that integrate ethical and equity considerations into their design and delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e69660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of technology in rehabilitation is transforming health care delivery for older adults, especially through telerehabilitation, which addresses barriers to in-person care.

Objective: This rapid review explores the ethical and equity concerns associated with telerehabilitation for older adults, focusing on challenges such as internet access, technology adoption, and digital literacy.

Methods: Conducted according to Cochrane Rapid Review guidelines, this review used the Metaverse Equitable Rehabilitation Therapy framework, focusing on equity and ethics. Studies included telerehabilitation services for adults aged 55 years and older, published between 2010 and 2023. Screening was conducted independently by 2 researchers using Rayyan (Qatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University), with full-text review by additional team members. Searches were performed in Medline and CINAHL.

Results: From 323 papers retrieved, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023. Disparities in socioeconomic status, geographic location, and racial and ethnic backgrounds were found to impact telerehabilitation use. Additionally, ethical concerns around privacy, security, and autonomy were often inadequately addressed.

Conclusions: This review emphasizes the need for culturally appropriate, accessible, and inclusive telerehabilitation services that integrate ethical and equity considerations into their design and delivery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年人远程康复中的伦理与公平挑战:快速回顾。
背景:康复技术的整合正在改变老年人的卫生保健服务,特别是通过远程康复,解决了面对面护理的障碍。目的:这篇快速综述探讨了与老年人远程康复相关的伦理和公平问题,重点关注互联网接入、技术采用和数字素养等挑战。方法:根据Cochrane快速回顾指南,本综述采用meta公平康复治疗框架,重点关注公平和伦理。研究包括2010年至2023年间发表的针对55岁及以上成年人的远程康复服务。筛选由2名研究人员使用Rayyan(哈马德·本·哈利法大学卡塔尔计算研究所)独立进行,并由其他团队成员进行全文审查。在Medline和CINAHL中进行搜索。结果:在323篇文献中,49篇符合纳入标准。纳入的研究发表于2013年至2023年之间。社会经济地位、地理位置、种族和民族背景的差异会影响远程康复的使用。此外,关于隐私、安全和自主权的伦理问题往往没有得到充分解决。结论:本综述强调需要在文化上适当、无障碍和包容性的远程康复服务,将道德和公平考虑纳入其设计和交付中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信