Performance of Prehospital Antibiotic Administration and Blood Culture Collection in a Physician-Staffed Mobile Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Romain Bonnet, Mohamed Abbas, Adrien Fischer, Jérôme Pugin, Laurent Suppan, Stephan Harbarth
{"title":"Performance of Prehospital Antibiotic Administration and Blood Culture Collection in a Physician-Staffed Mobile Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Romain Bonnet, Mohamed Abbas, Adrien Fischer, Jérôme Pugin, Laurent Suppan, Stephan Harbarth","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2547653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prehospital antibiotic administration prior to emergency department (ED) admission could reduce the delay of effective antibiotic treatment and thus mortality of septic patients. Additionally, collecting blood cultures early could improve microbial identification. We assessed the effect of ceftriaxone administration before ED admission on mortality. As our secondary objective, we evaluated the positivity and contamination rate of prehospital blood cultures in a prehospital physician-staffed system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computerized databases of a physician-staffed prehospital unit were screened for patients presenting with suspected sepsis and low systolic blood pressure (< 90 mmHg) between May 2013 and December 2018. The association between prehospital ceftriaxone administration and 28-day mortality, Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length-of-stay (LOS) was analyzed. The yield of blood cultures and frequency of contamination were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 septic patients matched the inclusion criteria. Prehospital antibiotics were administered in 60.6% (100/165) of cases. Twenty-eight-day mortality was similar between patients receiving and not receiving antibiotics (39.0 % vs 38.5%, <i>p</i> = 1.000). Hazard ratio of 28-day mortality was 0.87 (95%IC 0.51-1.47). Likewise, no statistically significant impact on 7-day mortality, ICU admission or LOS was found. Blood cultures showed a high positivity rate (35.4%, 23/65) and a low contamination rate (3.1%, 2/65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a physician-staffed prehospital system, prehospital blood cultures among critically ill, septic patients showed high positivity and low contamination rates. However, early ceftriaxone administration showed no impact on 28-day mortality, 7-day mortality, ICU admission and ED and ICU LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2547653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Prehospital antibiotic administration prior to emergency department (ED) admission could reduce the delay of effective antibiotic treatment and thus mortality of septic patients. Additionally, collecting blood cultures early could improve microbial identification. We assessed the effect of ceftriaxone administration before ED admission on mortality. As our secondary objective, we evaluated the positivity and contamination rate of prehospital blood cultures in a prehospital physician-staffed system.

Methods: The computerized databases of a physician-staffed prehospital unit were screened for patients presenting with suspected sepsis and low systolic blood pressure (< 90 mmHg) between May 2013 and December 2018. The association between prehospital ceftriaxone administration and 28-day mortality, Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length-of-stay (LOS) was analyzed. The yield of blood cultures and frequency of contamination were calculated.

Results: A total of 165 septic patients matched the inclusion criteria. Prehospital antibiotics were administered in 60.6% (100/165) of cases. Twenty-eight-day mortality was similar between patients receiving and not receiving antibiotics (39.0 % vs 38.5%, p = 1.000). Hazard ratio of 28-day mortality was 0.87 (95%IC 0.51-1.47). Likewise, no statistically significant impact on 7-day mortality, ICU admission or LOS was found. Blood cultures showed a high positivity rate (35.4%, 23/65) and a low contamination rate (3.1%, 2/65).

Conclusions: In a physician-staffed prehospital system, prehospital blood cultures among critically ill, septic patients showed high positivity and low contamination rates. However, early ceftriaxone administration showed no impact on 28-day mortality, 7-day mortality, ICU admission and ED and ICU LOS.

院前抗生素管理和血液培养收集在一个医生配备的流动单位的性能:一个回顾性队列研究。
目的:急诊科(ED)入院前给予院前抗生素治疗可减少脓毒症患者有效抗生素治疗的延误,从而降低死亡率。此外,早期收集血液培养物可以提高微生物鉴定。我们评估了急诊科入院前给予头孢曲松对死亡率的影响。作为我们的次要目标,我们评估院前医生配备系统的院前血液培养的阳性和污染率。方法:对2013年5月至2018年12月期间出现疑似脓毒症和低收缩压(< 90 mmHg)的院前病房的计算机数据库进行筛选。分析院前头孢曲松给药与28天死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率和住院时间(LOS)之间的关系。计算血培养的产量和污染的频率。结果:共有165例脓毒症患者符合纳入标准。60.6%(100/165)的病例院前使用抗生素。接受和未接受抗生素治疗的患者28天死亡率相似(39.0% vs 38.5%, p = 1.000)。28天死亡率的危险比为0.87 (95% ic0.51 -1.47)。同样,对7天死亡率、ICU入院或LOS也没有统计学上的显著影响。血培养阳性率高(35.4%,23/65),污染率低(3.1%,2/65)。结论:在有医护人员的院前系统中,危重症、脓毒症患者院前血培养阳性率高,污染率低。然而,早期给药头孢曲松对28天死亡率、7天死亡率、ICU入院率、ED和ICU LOS没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信