A Comparative Investigation of Undergraduate Dental Student Stress in the Management of Deep and Moderate Carious Lesions.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
V Chevalier, B Honari, H F Duncan
{"title":"A Comparative Investigation of Undergraduate Dental Student Stress in the Management of Deep and Moderate Carious Lesions.","authors":"V Chevalier, B Honari, H F Duncan","doi":"10.1111/iej.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary objective of this clinical study was to analyse, through physiological and psychological parameters, undergraduate dental student stress during the management of deep compared with moderate carious lesions. Additional objectives aimed to compare student confidence, anxiety and satisfaction during deep and moderate caries management and their perception of the quality of teaching they received regarding these treatments.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>In this crossover study, 35 clinical students treated deep and moderate caries on permanent vital teeth in adult patients with no history of spontaneous pain. The STAI-State (STAI-S) anxiety questionnaire was completed preoperatively. Stress-VAS (visual analogic scale) and confidence-VAS scores were collected during the preoperative (before anaesthesia), perioperative (end of caries excavation) and postoperative (after patient left) phases of both caries management. Cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were collected during the same stages. A satisfaction-VAS was completed postoperatively. The effects of the depth of the caries, time and student demographics on preoperative anxiety (STAI-S), pre-, peri- and postoperative stress, confidence, blood pressure and heart rate, as well as postoperative satisfaction, were assessed using Mixed ANOVA with multiple pairwise comparisons. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS. A questionnaire assessing teaching adequacy was completed after each treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment of deep caries led to a significantly higher level of stress and a significantly lower level of confidence among students than the treatment of moderate caries, pre-, per- and post-operatively (p ≤ 0.05). Student preoperative anxiety was significantly higher in cases of deep caries, and their post-operative satisfaction was significantly lower. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of cardiovascular parameters at any stage. There was no influence of the student year of study on the parameters examined; however, gender influenced confidence at all times combined, as well as preoperative stress, with females less confident and more stressed than males. The median level of perceived teaching 'adequacy' was higher for moderate caries than for deep caries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limits of this study, the management of deep carious lesions is associated with a higher level of stress among students compared with moderate caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The primary objective of this clinical study was to analyse, through physiological and psychological parameters, undergraduate dental student stress during the management of deep compared with moderate carious lesions. Additional objectives aimed to compare student confidence, anxiety and satisfaction during deep and moderate caries management and their perception of the quality of teaching they received regarding these treatments.

Methodology: In this crossover study, 35 clinical students treated deep and moderate caries on permanent vital teeth in adult patients with no history of spontaneous pain. The STAI-State (STAI-S) anxiety questionnaire was completed preoperatively. Stress-VAS (visual analogic scale) and confidence-VAS scores were collected during the preoperative (before anaesthesia), perioperative (end of caries excavation) and postoperative (after patient left) phases of both caries management. Cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were collected during the same stages. A satisfaction-VAS was completed postoperatively. The effects of the depth of the caries, time and student demographics on preoperative anxiety (STAI-S), pre-, peri- and postoperative stress, confidence, blood pressure and heart rate, as well as postoperative satisfaction, were assessed using Mixed ANOVA with multiple pairwise comparisons. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS. A questionnaire assessing teaching adequacy was completed after each treatment.

Results: The treatment of deep caries led to a significantly higher level of stress and a significantly lower level of confidence among students than the treatment of moderate caries, pre-, per- and post-operatively (p ≤ 0.05). Student preoperative anxiety was significantly higher in cases of deep caries, and their post-operative satisfaction was significantly lower. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of cardiovascular parameters at any stage. There was no influence of the student year of study on the parameters examined; however, gender influenced confidence at all times combined, as well as preoperative stress, with females less confident and more stressed than males. The median level of perceived teaching 'adequacy' was higher for moderate caries than for deep caries.

Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, the management of deep carious lesions is associated with a higher level of stress among students compared with moderate caries.

牙科专业大学生在处理深、中度龋齿时压力的比较研究。
目的:本临床研究的主要目的是通过生理和心理参数分析牙科本科学生在处理深度龋齿与中度龋齿时的压力。其他目标旨在比较学生在深度和中度龋齿治疗期间的信心、焦虑和满意度,以及他们对这些治疗的教学质量的看法。方法:在这项交叉研究中,35名临床学生治疗了无自发性疼痛史的成人恒生命牙的深度和中度龋。术前完成焦虑量表(STAI-State,简称STAI-S)。在术前(麻醉前)、围手术期(龋齿挖掘结束)和术后(患者离开后)两阶段收集应力- vas(视觉模拟量表)和置信- vas评分。在同一阶段收集心血管参数(血压和心率)。术后进行满意度vas评分。采用多重两两比较的混合方差分析(Mixed ANOVA)评估龋齿深度、时间和学生人口统计学对术前焦虑(STAI-S)、术前、围手术期和术后压力、信心、血压和心率以及术后满意度的影响。采用IBM SPSS软件进行统计分析。每次治疗后完成一份评估教学充分性的问卷。结果:深度龋治疗组学生压力水平显著高于中度龋治疗组,术前、中、术后信心水平显著低于中度龋治疗组(p≤0.05)。深度龋患者术前焦虑程度明显高于深度龋患者,术后满意度明显低于深度龋患者。然而,两组在任何阶段的心血管参数均无显著差异。学生的学习年限对所检查的参数没有影响;然而,性别在任何时候都影响信心,以及术前压力,女性比男性更不自信,压力更大。中度龋患者对教学“充分性”的感知中位数水平高于深度龋患者。结论:在本研究范围内,与中度龋齿相比,学生中深度龋齿的处理与更高水平的压力相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信