Nipuni D Nagahawatte, Peng Du, Hanyu Zhang, Haley N Patton, Jack M Rogers, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Leo K Cheng
{"title":"Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs.","authors":"Nipuni D Nagahawatte, Peng Du, Hanyu Zhang, Haley N Patton, Jack M Rogers, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Leo K Cheng","doi":"10.1152/ajpgi.00123.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gut motility is partly driven by underlying rhythmic electrical activity called slow waves. The origin and propagation of these electrical events are studied extensively in anesthetized animal models. However, the effects of anesthesia on slow waves remain unclear. This study examined how propofol and isoflurane influence spatiotemporal features of gastric slow waves, anterior-posterior coupling, and the efficacy of gastric pacing. Pigs were anesthetized with propofol (<i>n</i> = 7) and isoflurane (<i>n</i> = 8), and baseline electrical activity was measured using high-resolution surface-contact electrode arrays placed on the anterior and posterior gastric serosa. Following baseline recordings, pacing was applied to assess its effects. Slow wave propagation patterns were quantified, and the efficacy of spatial entrainment during pacing was compared under propofol and isoflurane. Under propofol, antegrade propagation was observed with 86% symmetry between anterior and posterior gastric surfaces, whereas isoflurane reduced symmetry to 25% (<i>P</i> = 0.0187) with propagation patterns frequently changing. Slow wave period (18.8 ± 5.1 vs. 28.1 ± 14.3 s, <i>P</i> = 0.016), amplitude (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 mV, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and speed (4.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 mm/s, <i>P</i> = 0.018) differed significantly between anesthetic groups at baseline, whereas only amplitude and speed differed during pacing. Spatial entrainment success was higher with propofol (83%) than with isoflurane (57%), but pacing effects remained localized to the paced surface without propagation across the greater curvature. Isoflurane induced more gastric dysrhythmias than propofol, making propofol preferable for studying normal activity and isoflurane preferred for investigating therapies. The uncoupling of anterior and posterior surfaces suggests a potential electrical barrier at the greater curvature, warranting further investigation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The influence of propofol and isoflurane on the spatial propagation of gastric slow wave activity under baseline and pacing conditions was defined for the first time. Slow waves were significantly ordered and coupled across the anterior and posterior surfaces of the stomach under propofol compared with isoflurane. Slow waves entrained during pacing were confined to the surface where pacing was applied, suggesting an electrical barrier along the greater curvature of the stomach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7725,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology","volume":" ","pages":"G457-G468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00123.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gut motility is partly driven by underlying rhythmic electrical activity called slow waves. The origin and propagation of these electrical events are studied extensively in anesthetized animal models. However, the effects of anesthesia on slow waves remain unclear. This study examined how propofol and isoflurane influence spatiotemporal features of gastric slow waves, anterior-posterior coupling, and the efficacy of gastric pacing. Pigs were anesthetized with propofol (n = 7) and isoflurane (n = 8), and baseline electrical activity was measured using high-resolution surface-contact electrode arrays placed on the anterior and posterior gastric serosa. Following baseline recordings, pacing was applied to assess its effects. Slow wave propagation patterns were quantified, and the efficacy of spatial entrainment during pacing was compared under propofol and isoflurane. Under propofol, antegrade propagation was observed with 86% symmetry between anterior and posterior gastric surfaces, whereas isoflurane reduced symmetry to 25% (P = 0.0187) with propagation patterns frequently changing. Slow wave period (18.8 ± 5.1 vs. 28.1 ± 14.3 s, P = 0.016), amplitude (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 mV, P = 0.002), and speed (4.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 mm/s, P = 0.018) differed significantly between anesthetic groups at baseline, whereas only amplitude and speed differed during pacing. Spatial entrainment success was higher with propofol (83%) than with isoflurane (57%), but pacing effects remained localized to the paced surface without propagation across the greater curvature. Isoflurane induced more gastric dysrhythmias than propofol, making propofol preferable for studying normal activity and isoflurane preferred for investigating therapies. The uncoupling of anterior and posterior surfaces suggests a potential electrical barrier at the greater curvature, warranting further investigation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The influence of propofol and isoflurane on the spatial propagation of gastric slow wave activity under baseline and pacing conditions was defined for the first time. Slow waves were significantly ordered and coupled across the anterior and posterior surfaces of the stomach under propofol compared with isoflurane. Slow waves entrained during pacing were confined to the surface where pacing was applied, suggesting an electrical barrier along the greater curvature of the stomach.
背景和目的:肠道运动部分是由被称为慢波的潜在节律性电活动驱动的。在麻醉动物模型中广泛研究了这些电事件的起源和传播。然而,麻醉对慢波的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨异丙酚和异氟醚对慢波时空特征、前后耦合和胃起搏效果的影响。方法:用异丙酚和异氟醚连续麻醉9头猪,使用放置在胃前后浆膜上的高分辨率表面接触电极阵列测量基线电活动。在基线记录之后,应用起搏来评估其效果。对慢波传播模式进行了量化,并比较了异丙酚和异氟醚对起搏过程中空间夹带的效果。结果:异丙酚在胃前后表面呈现出86%对称的顺行繁殖,而异氟醚则将对称减少到25% (p=0.0187),并且繁殖模式经常变化。两组在基线时慢波周期(18.8±5.1 vs 28.1±14.3 s, p=0.016)、振幅(1.5±0.7 vs 0.7±0.4 mV, p=0.002)和速度(4.4±1.1 vs 3.5±0.7 mm/s, p=0.018)差异显著,起搏时只有振幅和速度差异。异丙酚的空间诱导成功率(83%)高于异氟醚(57%),但起搏效果仍然局限于起搏表面,而没有在更大的曲率范围内传播。结论:异氟醚比异丙酚更容易引起胃节律障碍,因此异氟醚更适合用于研究正常活动,而异氟醚更适合用于研究治疗方法。前后表面的分离提示在大曲率处存在潜在的电屏障,值得进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology publishes original articles pertaining to all aspects of research involving normal or abnormal function of the gastrointestinal tract, hepatobiliary system, and pancreas. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts dealing with growth and development, digestion, secretion, absorption, metabolism, and motility relative to these organs, as well as research reports dealing with immune and inflammatory processes and with neural, endocrine, and circulatory control mechanisms that affect these organs.