D. Kydd-Sinclair , G.L. Packer , A.C. Weymouth-Wilson , K.A. Watson
{"title":"Structural Basis of Novel Bile Acid-Based Modulators of FXR","authors":"D. Kydd-Sinclair , G.L. Packer , A.C. Weymouth-Wilson , K.A. Watson","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Following its deorphanisation in the early 2000s, the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) attracted significant attention for regulating genes involved in bile acid, lipid and glucose metabolism and inflammation, pathways central to many liver diseases. As such, pharmaceutical efforts targeted FXR for their treatment. However, while FXR agonists, such as obeticholic acid, have been studied in clinical trials, many were associated with adverse effects arising from the promiscuity of systemic FXR activation, thus efforts to limit or selectively modulate the downstream effects of FXR are crucially important. In work here, two novel bile acid derivatives, previously identified via molecular docking and cell-based screening, were validated by X-ray crystallography and tested in LanthaScreen coactivator recruitment assays. Their effects on downstream FXR signalling were assessed <em>in vitro</em> in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and <em>in vivo</em> in C57BL/6 mice, by RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR. The novel compounds exhibited potent and selective FXR agonist activity. Co-crystal structures of FXR LBD with both compounds, demonstrated distinctive binding modes for each, including occupancy of a receptor sub-pocket associated with allosteric activation, not observed with classic bile acids. Both compounds were up to four-fold more potent than obeticholic acid and demonstrated ligand-dependent differences in coactivator recruitment assays. <em>In vitro</em>, both compounds induced greater changes in the expression of FXR target genes, at lower doses than obeticholic acid. I<em>n vivo</em>, compound-dependent differential gene expression was observed. These findings suggest that the novel compounds may enable gene-specific FXR regulation through differential coactivator usage and hold potential to overcome the shortcomings of current bile acid drugs, thus representing promising candidates for further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Biology","volume":"437 21","pages":"Article 169383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283625004498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following its deorphanisation in the early 2000s, the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) attracted significant attention for regulating genes involved in bile acid, lipid and glucose metabolism and inflammation, pathways central to many liver diseases. As such, pharmaceutical efforts targeted FXR for their treatment. However, while FXR agonists, such as obeticholic acid, have been studied in clinical trials, many were associated with adverse effects arising from the promiscuity of systemic FXR activation, thus efforts to limit or selectively modulate the downstream effects of FXR are crucially important. In work here, two novel bile acid derivatives, previously identified via molecular docking and cell-based screening, were validated by X-ray crystallography and tested in LanthaScreen coactivator recruitment assays. Their effects on downstream FXR signalling were assessed in vitro in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and in vivo in C57BL/6 mice, by RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR. The novel compounds exhibited potent and selective FXR agonist activity. Co-crystal structures of FXR LBD with both compounds, demonstrated distinctive binding modes for each, including occupancy of a receptor sub-pocket associated with allosteric activation, not observed with classic bile acids. Both compounds were up to four-fold more potent than obeticholic acid and demonstrated ligand-dependent differences in coactivator recruitment assays. In vitro, both compounds induced greater changes in the expression of FXR target genes, at lower doses than obeticholic acid. In vivo, compound-dependent differential gene expression was observed. These findings suggest that the novel compounds may enable gene-specific FXR regulation through differential coactivator usage and hold potential to overcome the shortcomings of current bile acid drugs, thus representing promising candidates for further research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Biology (JMB) provides high quality, comprehensive and broad coverage in all areas of molecular biology. The journal publishes original scientific research papers that provide mechanistic and functional insights and report a significant advance to the field. The journal encourages the submission of multidisciplinary studies that use complementary experimental and computational approaches to address challenging biological questions.
Research areas include but are not limited to: Biomolecular interactions, signaling networks, systems biology; Cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation; Cell death, autophagy; Cell signaling and regulation; Chemical biology; Computational biology, in combination with experimental studies; DNA replication, repair, and recombination; Development, regenerative biology, mechanistic and functional studies of stem cells; Epigenetics, chromatin structure and function; Gene expression; Membrane processes, cell surface proteins and cell-cell interactions; Methodological advances, both experimental and theoretical, including databases; Microbiology, virology, and interactions with the host or environment; Microbiota mechanistic and functional studies; Nuclear organization; Post-translational modifications, proteomics; Processing and function of biologically important macromolecules and complexes; Molecular basis of disease; RNA processing, structure and functions of non-coding RNAs, transcription; Sorting, spatiotemporal organization, trafficking; Structural biology; Synthetic biology; Translation, protein folding, chaperones, protein degradation and quality control.