Perceived parenting profiles and adolescents’ suicidal behaviors: Direct associations and gender differences

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Chuhan Wang , Jiaqi Guo , Xin Han , Jianing You
{"title":"Perceived parenting profiles and adolescents’ suicidal behaviors: Direct associations and gender differences","authors":"Chuhan Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Guo ,&nbsp;Xin Han ,&nbsp;Jianing You","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parenting styles (i.e., parental warmth, rejection, and overprotection) were found to have different effects on adolescents’ suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal attempts (SA). However, the impact of different combinations of parenting styles on adolescents’ SI and SA and their potential roles in explaining gender differences in SI/SA remains to be studied. This study aims to address these questions. A total of 6,461 Chinese adolescents (<em>M</em> <sub>age</sub> = 14.88, <em>SD</em> <sub>age</sub> = 0.86; 54.4 % males) were recruited to complete self-report measures, regarding perceived parenting style, SI, SA, and other demographic information. Latent profile analysis and the manual Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars method were used to test the hypotheses. Four parenting profiles (i.e., <em>supportive parenting</em>, <em>highly engaged parenting</em>, <em>disengaged parenting</em>, and <em>harsh parenting</em>) were identified. Adolescents in <em>harsh parenting</em> and <em>disengaged parenting</em> showed high suicide risk, whereas <em>supportive parenting</em> and <em>highly engaged parenting</em> showed low suicide risk. Girls across all profiles exhibited elevated levels of SI than boys, with only girls exposed to <em>harsh parenting</em> exhibiting higher levels of SA than boys within the same profile. The gender differences in SI significantly expanded in the <em>harsh parenting</em> profile. Findings revealed the different effects of parenting profiles on adolescents’ SI and SA and further indicated that these profiles moderated the gender differences in SI/SA. Researchers should continue to examine the mechanism underlying this process and develop specific intervention strategies for adolescents targeting negative parenting environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 108512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925003950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parenting styles (i.e., parental warmth, rejection, and overprotection) were found to have different effects on adolescents’ suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal attempts (SA). However, the impact of different combinations of parenting styles on adolescents’ SI and SA and their potential roles in explaining gender differences in SI/SA remains to be studied. This study aims to address these questions. A total of 6,461 Chinese adolescents (M age = 14.88, SD age = 0.86; 54.4 % males) were recruited to complete self-report measures, regarding perceived parenting style, SI, SA, and other demographic information. Latent profile analysis and the manual Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars method were used to test the hypotheses. Four parenting profiles (i.e., supportive parenting, highly engaged parenting, disengaged parenting, and harsh parenting) were identified. Adolescents in harsh parenting and disengaged parenting showed high suicide risk, whereas supportive parenting and highly engaged parenting showed low suicide risk. Girls across all profiles exhibited elevated levels of SI than boys, with only girls exposed to harsh parenting exhibiting higher levels of SA than boys within the same profile. The gender differences in SI significantly expanded in the harsh parenting profile. Findings revealed the different effects of parenting profiles on adolescents’ SI and SA and further indicated that these profiles moderated the gender differences in SI/SA. Researchers should continue to examine the mechanism underlying this process and develop specific intervention strategies for adolescents targeting negative parenting environment.
感知父母背景与青少年自杀行为:直接关联和性别差异
父母教养方式(即父母温暖、拒绝和过度保护)对青少年自杀意念(SI)和自杀企图(SA)有不同的影响。然而,不同教养方式组合对青少年SI/SA的影响及其在解释SI/SA的性别差异中的潜在作用仍有待研究。本研究旨在解决这些问题。共6461名中国青少年(M年龄= 14.88,SD年龄= 0.86;(54.4%男性)被招募来完成自我报告测量,包括感知到的父母教养方式、SI、SA和其他人口统计信息。采用隐型分析和人工Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars方法检验假设。确定了四种育儿方式(即支持性育儿、高度投入育儿、疏离育儿和严厉育儿)。严厉父母和疏离父母的青少年自杀风险较高,而支持父母和高度投入父母的青少年自杀风险较低。在所有情况下,女孩的SI水平都高于男孩,只有在同样情况下,受到严厉教育的女孩的SA水平高于男孩。在严厉的养育方式中,SI的性别差异显著扩大。研究结果揭示了不同的父母背景对青少年SI/SA的影响,并进一步表明这些背景调节了SI/SA的性别差异。研究者应该继续研究这一过程背后的机制,并针对青少年的消极父母环境制定具体的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信