Challenging current evidence: Peripheral perfusion index fails as a predictor of postinduction hypotension – Findings from a large diverse surgical population
Karam Azem M.D , Roussana Aranbitski M.D , Alexander Peres M.D , Daniel Iluz-Freundlich M.D., B.Sc , Vincent Gliesche M.D , Olga Ciobanu-Caraus M.D , Sharon Orbach-Zinger M.D , Benjamin Zribi M.D , Shai Fein M.D , Philip Heesen B.Sc
{"title":"Challenging current evidence: Peripheral perfusion index fails as a predictor of postinduction hypotension – Findings from a large diverse surgical population","authors":"Karam Azem M.D , Roussana Aranbitski M.D , Alexander Peres M.D , Daniel Iluz-Freundlich M.D., B.Sc , Vincent Gliesche M.D , Olga Ciobanu-Caraus M.D , Sharon Orbach-Zinger M.D , Benjamin Zribi M.D , Shai Fein M.D , Philip Heesen B.Sc","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postinduction hypotension (PIH) is a common complication of general anesthesia with potential clinical consequences. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) has a high predictive value for PIH. However, this was limited by small sample sizes and significant heterogeneity. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of preinduction PPI for PIH in a large surgical cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed 6653 adult patients who had general anesthesia between May 2022 and May 2023. PIH was defined as mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg within 20 min after induction. We assessed the predictive performance of preinduction PPI for estimating PIH using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of PIH.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall incidence of PIH was 51.5 %. Preinduction PPI values were similar between patients who developed PIH and those who did not (1.22 [0.69–2.23] vs. 1.23 [0.75–2.13], <em>P</em> = 0.284). PPI demonstrated poor predictive performance for PIH (AUC 0.51, 95 % CI 0.49–0.52), with low sensitivity (31 %) and modest specificity (72 %) at the optimal cutoff (0.81). This poor discrimination persisted across all postinduction time intervals and patient subgroups. In contrast, independent predictors of PIH included preinduction mean arterial pressure, advanced age, higher ASA physical status, and emergency surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite promising results from smaller studies, we found that preinduction PPI had no significant predictive value for PIH in a large, diverse surgical population. Anesthesiologists should focus on established risk factors rather than PPI when assessing PIH risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111969"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Postinduction hypotension (PIH) is a common complication of general anesthesia with potential clinical consequences. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) has a high predictive value for PIH. However, this was limited by small sample sizes and significant heterogeneity. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of preinduction PPI for PIH in a large surgical cohort.
Methods
In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed 6653 adult patients who had general anesthesia between May 2022 and May 2023. PIH was defined as mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg within 20 min after induction. We assessed the predictive performance of preinduction PPI for estimating PIH using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of PIH.
Results
The overall incidence of PIH was 51.5 %. Preinduction PPI values were similar between patients who developed PIH and those who did not (1.22 [0.69–2.23] vs. 1.23 [0.75–2.13], P = 0.284). PPI demonstrated poor predictive performance for PIH (AUC 0.51, 95 % CI 0.49–0.52), with low sensitivity (31 %) and modest specificity (72 %) at the optimal cutoff (0.81). This poor discrimination persisted across all postinduction time intervals and patient subgroups. In contrast, independent predictors of PIH included preinduction mean arterial pressure, advanced age, higher ASA physical status, and emergency surgery.
Conclusion
Despite promising results from smaller studies, we found that preinduction PPI had no significant predictive value for PIH in a large, diverse surgical population. Anesthesiologists should focus on established risk factors rather than PPI when assessing PIH risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.