{"title":"Comparison of Nurses’ and Families’ beliefs and attitudes regarding visiting policy in selected intensive care units of Ghana","authors":"Yakubu H. Yakubu , Navab Elham , Maryam Esmaeili","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging environment for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Nurses often seek a calm and controlled work setting, while families prioritize proximity to their loved ones due to an increased feeling of anxiety. Existing literature suggests that liberalized visiting hours may offer benefits, such as reducing patient anxiety and improving communication between patients and families. However, there are also conflicting viewpoints on this matter.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to compare the beliefs and attitudes of nurses and families regarding ICU visiting policies in selected hospitals in Ghana.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A comparative descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design was employed for this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were recruited from four public hospitals in Ghana, using consensus sampling for nurses and convenient sampling for family members. A self-administered questionnaire, the <em>Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Visiting in ICU Questionnaire (BAVIQ)</em>, was utilized as the primary data collection tool. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found a significant difference in the beliefs of nurses and families, but no significant difference in their attitudes towards ICU visitation. An independent <em>t</em>-test revealed that nurses favoured a restricted visiting policy, whereas families preferred an open visiting policy, although their attitudes remained somewhat skeptical. Nurses preferred that only three or fewer persons visit a patient in 24 h. Family members preferred 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A significant relationship was identified between nurses’ beliefs, attitudes, and demographic variables, except for age. Family members supported visitation but expressed concerns that unrestricted visiting could disrupt patient rest, cause psychological stress, and infringe on privacy. They favoured a slightly restrictive visiting policy, allowing 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. To enhance patient-centered care, a balanced approach that considers the needs of patients, families, and healthcare professionals should be adopted when developing ICU visitation policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139125000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging environment for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Nurses often seek a calm and controlled work setting, while families prioritize proximity to their loved ones due to an increased feeling of anxiety. Existing literature suggests that liberalized visiting hours may offer benefits, such as reducing patient anxiety and improving communication between patients and families. However, there are also conflicting viewpoints on this matter.
Objective
This study aims to compare the beliefs and attitudes of nurses and families regarding ICU visiting policies in selected hospitals in Ghana.
Design
A comparative descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design was employed for this study.
Methods
Participants were recruited from four public hospitals in Ghana, using consensus sampling for nurses and convenient sampling for family members. A self-administered questionnaire, the Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Visiting in ICU Questionnaire (BAVIQ), was utilized as the primary data collection tool. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16.
Results
The study found a significant difference in the beliefs of nurses and families, but no significant difference in their attitudes towards ICU visitation. An independent t-test revealed that nurses favoured a restricted visiting policy, whereas families preferred an open visiting policy, although their attitudes remained somewhat skeptical. Nurses preferred that only three or fewer persons visit a patient in 24 h. Family members preferred 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time.
Conclusion
A significant relationship was identified between nurses’ beliefs, attitudes, and demographic variables, except for age. Family members supported visitation but expressed concerns that unrestricted visiting could disrupt patient rest, cause psychological stress, and infringe on privacy. They favoured a slightly restrictive visiting policy, allowing 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. To enhance patient-centered care, a balanced approach that considers the needs of patients, families, and healthcare professionals should be adopted when developing ICU visitation policies.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.