Exploring dimensions of perceived anthropomorphism in conversational AI: Implications for human identity threat and dehumanization

Yejin Lee , Sang-Hwan Kim
{"title":"Exploring dimensions of perceived anthropomorphism in conversational AI: Implications for human identity threat and dehumanization","authors":"Yejin Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to identify humanlike traits in conversational AI (CAI) that influence human identity threat and dehumanization, and to propose design guidelines that mitigate these effects. An online survey was conducted with 323 participants. Factor analysis revealed four key dimensions of perceived anthropomorphism in CAI: Self-likeness, Communication &amp; Memory, Social Adaptability, and Agency. Structural equation modeling showed that Self-likeness heightened both perceived human identity threat and dehumanization, whereas Agency significantly moderated these effects while also directly mitigating dehumanization. Social Adaptability generally reduced perceived human identity threat but amplified it when combined with high Self-likeness. Furthermore, younger individuals were more likely to experience perceived human identity threat and dehumanization, underscoring the importance of considering user age. By elucidating the psychological structure underlying users’ perceptions of CAI anthropomorphism, this study deepens understanding of its psychosocial implications and provides practical guidance for the ethical design of CAI systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify humanlike traits in conversational AI (CAI) that influence human identity threat and dehumanization, and to propose design guidelines that mitigate these effects. An online survey was conducted with 323 participants. Factor analysis revealed four key dimensions of perceived anthropomorphism in CAI: Self-likeness, Communication & Memory, Social Adaptability, and Agency. Structural equation modeling showed that Self-likeness heightened both perceived human identity threat and dehumanization, whereas Agency significantly moderated these effects while also directly mitigating dehumanization. Social Adaptability generally reduced perceived human identity threat but amplified it when combined with high Self-likeness. Furthermore, younger individuals were more likely to experience perceived human identity threat and dehumanization, underscoring the importance of considering user age. By elucidating the psychological structure underlying users’ perceptions of CAI anthropomorphism, this study deepens understanding of its psychosocial implications and provides practical guidance for the ethical design of CAI systems.
探索对话人工智能中感知的拟人化维度:对人类身份威胁和非人性化的影响
本研究旨在确定会话人工智能(CAI)中影响人类身份威胁和非人性化的类人特征,并提出减轻这些影响的设计指导方针。这项在线调查共有323人参与。因子分析揭示了CAI中感知拟人化的四个关键维度:自我相似、沟通与沟通;记忆、社会适应性和能动性。结构方程模型表明,自我相似性增加了感知到的人类身份威胁和非人性化,而代理显著地调节了这些影响,同时也直接减轻了非人性化。社会适应能力通常会降低感知到的人类身份威胁,但当与高度自我相似相结合时,会放大这种威胁。此外,年轻人更有可能体验到人类身份威胁和非人性化,这强调了考虑用户年龄的重要性。本研究通过阐明使用者对人工智能拟人化感知的心理结构,加深对其心理社会含义的理解,并为人工智能系统的伦理设计提供实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信