{"title":"The McDonaldization of democracy? Globalization and space-making in practices of innovating mini-publics","authors":"Jan-Peter Voß , Jannik Schritt","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper proposes an “ontographic approach” to the study of globalization. It focuses on different ontologies of globalization enacted in practices of translocal innovation. We distinguish: (1) modern globalization in practices of regionally expanding functional systems, (2) postmodern globalization in practices of fluidly dispersing heterogeneous assemblages, and (3) reflexive modern globalization in practices of infrastructuring translocal networks. We illustrate these different ways of doing globalization with accounts of democratic innovation practices that seek to spread “mini-publics” as a new form of deliberative democracy. At first glance, this may appear to be the McDonaldization of democracy, referring to Ritzer’s model of globalization as a worldwide expansion of Western functionalist management and standardization. On closer inspection, however, we find that three different ways of doing globalization coexist, each associated with different ways of doing social order and space. We propose the ontographic approach to account for this diversity. We then suggest it as a more general approach to turn the confrontation of modern, postmodern, and reflexive modern theories of globalization into a heuristic repertoire for studying how different forms of globalization are done in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper proposes an “ontographic approach” to the study of globalization. It focuses on different ontologies of globalization enacted in practices of translocal innovation. We distinguish: (1) modern globalization in practices of regionally expanding functional systems, (2) postmodern globalization in practices of fluidly dispersing heterogeneous assemblages, and (3) reflexive modern globalization in practices of infrastructuring translocal networks. We illustrate these different ways of doing globalization with accounts of democratic innovation practices that seek to spread “mini-publics” as a new form of deliberative democracy. At first glance, this may appear to be the McDonaldization of democracy, referring to Ritzer’s model of globalization as a worldwide expansion of Western functionalist management and standardization. On closer inspection, however, we find that three different ways of doing globalization coexist, each associated with different ways of doing social order and space. We propose the ontographic approach to account for this diversity. We then suggest it as a more general approach to turn the confrontation of modern, postmodern, and reflexive modern theories of globalization into a heuristic repertoire for studying how different forms of globalization are done in practice.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.