The McDonaldization of democracy? Globalization and space-making in practices of innovating mini-publics

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Jan-Peter Voß , Jannik Schritt
{"title":"The McDonaldization of democracy? Globalization and space-making in practices of innovating mini-publics","authors":"Jan-Peter Voß ,&nbsp;Jannik Schritt","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper proposes an “ontographic approach” to the study of globalization. It focuses on different ontologies of globalization enacted in practices of translocal innovation. We distinguish: (1) modern globalization in practices of regionally expanding functional systems, (2) postmodern globalization in practices of fluidly dispersing heterogeneous assemblages, and (3) reflexive modern globalization in practices of infrastructuring translocal networks. We illustrate these different ways of doing globalization with accounts of democratic innovation practices that seek to spread “mini-publics” as a new form of deliberative democracy. At first glance, this may appear to be the McDonaldization of democracy, referring to Ritzer’s model of globalization as a worldwide expansion of Western functionalist management and standardization. On closer inspection, however, we find that three different ways of doing globalization coexist, each associated with different ways of doing social order and space. We propose the ontographic approach to account for this diversity. We then suggest it as a more general approach to turn the confrontation of modern, postmodern, and reflexive modern theories of globalization into a heuristic repertoire for studying how different forms of globalization are done in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper proposes an “ontographic approach” to the study of globalization. It focuses on different ontologies of globalization enacted in practices of translocal innovation. We distinguish: (1) modern globalization in practices of regionally expanding functional systems, (2) postmodern globalization in practices of fluidly dispersing heterogeneous assemblages, and (3) reflexive modern globalization in practices of infrastructuring translocal networks. We illustrate these different ways of doing globalization with accounts of democratic innovation practices that seek to spread “mini-publics” as a new form of deliberative democracy. At first glance, this may appear to be the McDonaldization of democracy, referring to Ritzer’s model of globalization as a worldwide expansion of Western functionalist management and standardization. On closer inspection, however, we find that three different ways of doing globalization coexist, each associated with different ways of doing social order and space. We propose the ontographic approach to account for this diversity. We then suggest it as a more general approach to turn the confrontation of modern, postmodern, and reflexive modern theories of globalization into a heuristic repertoire for studying how different forms of globalization are done in practice.
民主的麦当劳化?微型公共创新实践中的全球化与空间制造
本文提出了全球化研究的“本体论方法”。它侧重于在跨地区创新实践中制定的全球化的不同本体。我们区分:(1)区域扩展功能系统实践中的现代全球化,(2)流动分散异质组合实践中的后现代全球化,以及(3)跨区域基础设施网络实践中的反思性现代全球化。我们通过民主创新实践来说明这些实现全球化的不同方式,这些实践试图传播“迷你公众”作为协商民主的一种新形式。乍一看,这似乎是民主的麦当劳化,指的是里策尔的全球化模式,即西方功能主义管理和标准化的全球扩张。然而,仔细观察,我们发现三种不同的全球化方式并存,每种方式都与不同的社会秩序和空间方式相关联。我们提出本体论的方法来解释这种多样性。然后,我们建议将其作为一种更普遍的方法,将现代、后现代和反思性的现代全球化理论的对抗转化为研究不同形式的全球化如何在实践中完成的启发式技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信