Quantitative estimation models of relationship between aeolian sand and soil geochemical composition based on machine learning algorithm

IF 3.4 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Weiji Wen , Fan Yang , Shuyun Xie , Chengwen Wang , Yuntao Song , Yuepeng Zhang , Weihang Zhou
{"title":"Quantitative estimation models of relationship between aeolian sand and soil geochemical composition based on machine learning algorithm","authors":"Weiji Wen ,&nbsp;Fan Yang ,&nbsp;Shuyun Xie ,&nbsp;Chengwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yuntao Song ,&nbsp;Yuepeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Weihang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitative estimation models are key to studying the relationship between aeolian sand and soil geochemical composition, as well as for assessing the extent of their influence. However, few studies have developed quantitative models to evaluate how aeolian sand interferes with soil chemical element content, and current approaches primarily rely on provenance analysis through isotopes or major elements. This study combines machine learning regression models with curve regression models to explore the effectiveness of different approaches in constructing quantitative estimation model for aeolian sand interference on soil chemical composition. Our study demonstrated that, of the five different models applied in this study, the Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) models produced the most reliable results. The overall dataset of desert and soil samples conformed to a third-order polynomial fitting model in mathematical relationships, yielding a relatively stable explicit estimation model that quantitatively characterizes the extent of aeolian sand interference on soil chemical composition. This indicates that the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory can be applied to geochemical data, offering significant scientific and practical value for exploring the driving mechanisms of surface elements in desert and surrounding areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292725002513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative estimation models are key to studying the relationship between aeolian sand and soil geochemical composition, as well as for assessing the extent of their influence. However, few studies have developed quantitative models to evaluate how aeolian sand interferes with soil chemical element content, and current approaches primarily rely on provenance analysis through isotopes or major elements. This study combines machine learning regression models with curve regression models to explore the effectiveness of different approaches in constructing quantitative estimation model for aeolian sand interference on soil chemical composition. Our study demonstrated that, of the five different models applied in this study, the Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) models produced the most reliable results. The overall dataset of desert and soil samples conformed to a third-order polynomial fitting model in mathematical relationships, yielding a relatively stable explicit estimation model that quantitatively characterizes the extent of aeolian sand interference on soil chemical composition. This indicates that the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory can be applied to geochemical data, offering significant scientific and practical value for exploring the driving mechanisms of surface elements in desert and surrounding areas.
基于机器学习算法的风沙与土壤地球化学组成关系定量估计模型
定量估算模型是研究风沙与土壤地球化学组成关系以及评估其影响程度的关键。然而,很少有研究建立定量模型来评估风沙对土壤化学元素含量的干扰,目前的方法主要依赖于通过同位素或主元素分析物源。本研究将机器学习回归模型与曲线回归模型相结合,探讨不同方法构建风沙干扰土壤化学成分定量估算模型的有效性。我们的研究表明,在本研究中应用的五种不同模型中,支持向量回归(SVR)和随机森林回归(RFR)模型产生了最可靠的结果。总体数据集与土壤样品在数学关系上符合三阶多项式拟合模型,得到了一个相对稳定的显式估算模型,定量表征了风沙对土壤化学成分的干扰程度。这表明环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)理论可以应用于地球化学数据,为探索沙漠及周边地区地表元素驱动机制提供了重要的科学和实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geochemistry
Applied Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
272
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application. Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信