Spatiotemporal XAI: Explaining video regression models in echocardiography videos for ejection fraction prediction

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yakup Abrek Er , Arda Guler , Mehmet Cagri Demir , Hande Uysal , Gamze Babur Guler , Ilkay Oksuz
{"title":"Spatiotemporal XAI: Explaining video regression models in echocardiography videos for ejection fraction prediction","authors":"Yakup Abrek Er ,&nbsp;Arda Guler ,&nbsp;Mehmet Cagri Demir ,&nbsp;Hande Uysal ,&nbsp;Gamze Babur Guler ,&nbsp;Ilkay Oksuz","doi":"10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deep learning has showcased unprecedented success in automating echocardiography analysis. However, most of the deep learning algorithms are hindered at clinical translation due to their black-box nature. This paper aims to tackle this issue by quantitatively evaluating video regression models’ focus on the left ventricle (LV) for ejection fraction (EF) prediction task spatiotemporally in apical 4 chamber (A4C) echocardiograms using a gradient-based saliency method. We performed a quantitative evaluation to assess the ratio of how many of the maximum absolute gradient values of the deep learning models fall on the left ventricle for the video regression task of ejection fraction prediction. Then, we extend the experiment and pick the most important gradients as the segmentation size and check the ratio of intersection. Finally, we picked temporally aligned sub-clips from end diastole to end systole and calculated the expected accuracies of the mentioned metrics in time. All tests are performed in 3 different models with different architectures and results are examined quantitatively. The filtered test set includes 1209 A4C echo videos of with mean EF of 55.5%. Trained models showed 0.73 to 0.83 Pointing Game scores, where it was 0.09 for the baseline random model. <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> intersection score was 0.46 to 0.50 for the trained models, whereas the random model’s score was 0.18. Models have higher pointing game scores on the end diastole and end systole compared to intermediate frames. Transformer based models’ <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> intersection scores were negatively correlated with their error rate. All models located the left ventricle successfully and their localization performance was generally better in semantically important frames rather than the larger target area. This observation from the spatiotemporal analysis suggests possible clinical relevance to model reasoning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50374,"journal":{"name":"Image and Vision Computing","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image and Vision Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0262885625002793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning has showcased unprecedented success in automating echocardiography analysis. However, most of the deep learning algorithms are hindered at clinical translation due to their black-box nature. This paper aims to tackle this issue by quantitatively evaluating video regression models’ focus on the left ventricle (LV) for ejection fraction (EF) prediction task spatiotemporally in apical 4 chamber (A4C) echocardiograms using a gradient-based saliency method. We performed a quantitative evaluation to assess the ratio of how many of the maximum absolute gradient values of the deep learning models fall on the left ventricle for the video regression task of ejection fraction prediction. Then, we extend the experiment and pick the most important gradients as the segmentation size and check the ratio of intersection. Finally, we picked temporally aligned sub-clips from end diastole to end systole and calculated the expected accuracies of the mentioned metrics in time. All tests are performed in 3 different models with different architectures and results are examined quantitatively. The filtered test set includes 1209 A4C echo videos of with mean EF of 55.5%. Trained models showed 0.73 to 0.83 Pointing Game scores, where it was 0.09 for the baseline random model. mGT intersection score was 0.46 to 0.50 for the trained models, whereas the random model’s score was 0.18. Models have higher pointing game scores on the end diastole and end systole compared to intermediate frames. Transformer based models’ mGT intersection scores were negatively correlated with their error rate. All models located the left ventricle successfully and their localization performance was generally better in semantically important frames rather than the larger target area. This observation from the spatiotemporal analysis suggests possible clinical relevance to model reasoning.
时空XAI:解释超声心动图视频中用于射血分数预测的视频回归模型
深度学习在自动化超声心动图分析方面取得了前所未有的成功。然而,由于其黑箱性质,大多数深度学习算法在临床翻译中受到阻碍。本文旨在通过使用基于梯度的显著性方法定量评估视频回归模型在顶室(A4C)超声心动图中对左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)时空预测任务的关注,来解决这一问题。我们进行了定量评估,以评估深度学习模型的最大绝对梯度值落在左心室的比例,用于射血分数预测的视频回归任务。然后,我们扩展实验,选择最重要的梯度作为分割大小,并检查相交率。最后,我们从舒张末端到收缩期末端选取时间对齐的子夹,并及时计算上述指标的预期精度。所有的测试都在3种不同的模型中进行,并对结果进行了定量检验。滤波后的测试集包括1209个A4C回波视频,平均EF为55.5%。经过训练的模型显示了0.73到0.83的“指向游戏”得分,而基线随机模型的得分为0.09。训练模型的mGT交叉口得分为0.46 ~ 0.50,而随机模型的交叉口得分为0.18。与中间帧相比,模型在舒张末期和收缩末期具有更高的指向游戏分数。基于变压器的模型的mGT交叉得分与其错误率呈负相关。所有模型都成功地定位了左心室,并且在语义重要帧的定位效果优于更大的目标区域。这一观察从时空分析提示可能的临床相关性模型推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Image and Vision Computing
Image and Vision Computing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: Image and Vision Computing has as a primary aim the provision of an effective medium of interchange for the results of high quality theoretical and applied research fundamental to all aspects of image interpretation and computer vision. The journal publishes work that proposes new image interpretation and computer vision methodology or addresses the application of such methods to real world scenes. It seeks to strengthen a deeper understanding in the discipline by encouraging the quantitative comparison and performance evaluation of the proposed methodology. The coverage includes: image interpretation, scene modelling, object recognition and tracking, shape analysis, monitoring and surveillance, active vision and robotic systems, SLAM, biologically-inspired computer vision, motion analysis, stereo vision, document image understanding, character and handwritten text recognition, face and gesture recognition, biometrics, vision-based human-computer interaction, human activity and behavior understanding, data fusion from multiple sensor inputs, image databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信