Nithya Lingampalli, Geoffrey W Schemitsch, William Obremskey, Emil H Schemitsch, Ashley E Levack
{"title":"A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries.","authors":"Nithya Lingampalli, Geoffrey W Schemitsch, William Obremskey, Emil H Schemitsch, Ashley E Levack","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In North America, orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries can be broadly categorized into 4 groups: national registries without subscription, national registries with subscription, for-profit registries, and nontrauma-specific and insurance databases. In the United States, the National Trauma Data Bank is the largest national trauma registry and can be freely accessed but lacks many specifics and outcomes pertinent to patients with fracture as data are only for the inpatient stay. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association/American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Fracture and Trauma Registry is a 2-year-old subscription-based database designed to account for shortcomings in the now defunct Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture registry. Three additional registries exist with focused patient populations: Own the Bone (a subscription-based database focused on osteoporotic fractures and secondary prevention) and 2 military registries, the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Military Orthopedic Trauma Registry (both restricted-access databases focusing on combat-related fractures and injuries sustained by military personnel). In Canada, there is no active national trauma registry. The previous National Trauma Registry was operational from 1997 to 2014, but closed because of limited use, reallocation of funding, and lack of data timeliness. Provincial trauma registries are the source of most trauma-specific registry data; however, most fragility fractures and other low-energy injuries are not captured. North America's most widely used registries, the National Trauma Data Bank and Canadian provincial registries, provide little data on fracture-specific outcomes. The addition of fracture-specific variables and outcomes would significantly enhance the ability for these registries to become a more valuable resource for orthopaedic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 4 Suppl","pages":"e390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In North America, orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries can be broadly categorized into 4 groups: national registries without subscription, national registries with subscription, for-profit registries, and nontrauma-specific and insurance databases. In the United States, the National Trauma Data Bank is the largest national trauma registry and can be freely accessed but lacks many specifics and outcomes pertinent to patients with fracture as data are only for the inpatient stay. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association/American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Fracture and Trauma Registry is a 2-year-old subscription-based database designed to account for shortcomings in the now defunct Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture registry. Three additional registries exist with focused patient populations: Own the Bone (a subscription-based database focused on osteoporotic fractures and secondary prevention) and 2 military registries, the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Military Orthopedic Trauma Registry (both restricted-access databases focusing on combat-related fractures and injuries sustained by military personnel). In Canada, there is no active national trauma registry. The previous National Trauma Registry was operational from 1997 to 2014, but closed because of limited use, reallocation of funding, and lack of data timeliness. Provincial trauma registries are the source of most trauma-specific registry data; however, most fragility fractures and other low-energy injuries are not captured. North America's most widely used registries, the National Trauma Data Bank and Canadian provincial registries, provide little data on fracture-specific outcomes. The addition of fracture-specific variables and outcomes would significantly enhance the ability for these registries to become a more valuable resource for orthopaedic surgeons.
在北美,骨科创伤和骨折登记可大致分为4类:无登记的国家登记、有登记的国家登记、营利性登记和非创伤特异性和保险数据库。在美国,国家创伤数据库是最大的国家创伤登记处,可以免费访问,但由于数据仅用于住院,因此缺乏与骨折患者相关的许多细节和结果。骨科创伤协会/美国骨科医师学会骨折与创伤登记处是一个有2年历史的基于订阅的数据库,旨在弥补现已不存在的骨科创伤协会骨折登记处的不足。另外还有三个针对特定患者群体的注册数据库:Own the Bone(一个基于订阅的数据库,重点关注骨质疏松性骨折和二级预防)和2个军事注册数据库,即国防部创伤注册数据库和军事骨科创伤注册数据库(这两个数据库都是限制访问的数据库,重点关注军事人员遭受的与战斗有关的骨折和损伤)。在加拿大,没有活跃的国家创伤登记处。之前的国家创伤登记处从1997年到2014年一直在运作,但由于使用有限、资金重新分配和数据缺乏及时性而关闭。省级创伤登记处是大多数创伤特异性登记处数据的来源;然而,大多数脆性骨折和其他低能量损伤未被捕获。北美最广泛使用的登记系统,国家创伤数据库和加拿大省级登记系统,几乎没有提供骨折特定结果的数据。增加骨折特异性变量和结果将显著增强这些登记的能力,使其成为骨科医生更有价值的资源。