A survey of biclustering and clustering methods in clustering different types of single-cell RNA sequencing data.

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Chaowang Lan, Xiaoqi Tang, Caihua Liu
{"title":"A survey of biclustering and clustering methods in clustering different types of single-cell RNA sequencing data.","authors":"Chaowang Lan, Xiaoqi Tang, Caihua Liu","doi":"10.1093/bfgp/elaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has garnered considerable attention as it enables the exploration of cellular heterogeneity from a single-cell perspective. Various unsupervised methods, such as biclustering and clustering methods, offer a theoretical foundation for understanding the structure and function of cells. However, accurately identifying cell subtypes within complex scRNA-seq data remains challenging. To evaluate the current development status; summarize the strengths, weaknesses, and improvement strategies of unsupervised methods; and provide guidelines for future research, we surveyed five biclustering and 21 clustering methods applied to different types of scRNA-seq datasets. We employed three external and two internal metrics to determine clustering performance on 10 publicly available real datasets. Dataset properties are quantified from six perspectives to discover the most suitable biclustering or clustering methods. The results of this survey indicate that biclustering methods are effective for identifying local consistency or for deeply mining partially annotated datasets. Conversely, clustering methods are more suitable for dealing with unknown datasets. This survey aids in identifying cellular heterogeneity by recommending appropriate methods based on different dataset characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55323,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Functional Genomics","volume":"24 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Functional Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elaf010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has garnered considerable attention as it enables the exploration of cellular heterogeneity from a single-cell perspective. Various unsupervised methods, such as biclustering and clustering methods, offer a theoretical foundation for understanding the structure and function of cells. However, accurately identifying cell subtypes within complex scRNA-seq data remains challenging. To evaluate the current development status; summarize the strengths, weaknesses, and improvement strategies of unsupervised methods; and provide guidelines for future research, we surveyed five biclustering and 21 clustering methods applied to different types of scRNA-seq datasets. We employed three external and two internal metrics to determine clustering performance on 10 publicly available real datasets. Dataset properties are quantified from six perspectives to discover the most suitable biclustering or clustering methods. The results of this survey indicate that biclustering methods are effective for identifying local consistency or for deeply mining partially annotated datasets. Conversely, clustering methods are more suitable for dealing with unknown datasets. This survey aids in identifying cellular heterogeneity by recommending appropriate methods based on different dataset characteristics.

不同类型单细胞RNA测序数据聚类的双聚类和聚类方法综述。
单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)技术由于能够从单细胞角度探索细胞异质性而引起了相当大的关注。各种无监督方法,如双聚类和聚类方法,为理解细胞的结构和功能提供了理论基础。然而,在复杂的scRNA-seq数据中准确识别细胞亚型仍然具有挑战性。评价目前的发展状况;总结无监督方法的优点、缺点和改进策略;为今后的研究提供指导,我们调查了应用于不同类型scRNA-seq数据集的5种双聚类和21种聚类方法。我们使用了三个外部指标和两个内部指标来确定10个公开可用的真实数据集的集群性能。从六个角度对数据集属性进行量化,以发现最合适的双聚类或聚类方法。调查结果表明,双聚类方法对于识别局部一致性或深度挖掘部分注释数据集是有效的。相反,聚类方法更适合于处理未知数据集。该调查通过推荐基于不同数据集特征的适当方法,有助于识别细胞异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in Functional Genomics
Briefings in Functional Genomics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Briefings in Functional Genomics publishes high quality peer reviewed articles that focus on the use, development or exploitation of genomic approaches, and their application to all areas of biological research. As well as exploring thematic areas where these techniques and protocols are being used, articles review the impact that these approaches have had, or are likely to have, on their field. Subjects covered by the Journal include but are not restricted to: the identification and functional characterisation of coding and non-coding features in genomes, microarray technologies, gene expression profiling, next generation sequencing, pharmacogenomics, phenomics, SNP technologies, transgenic systems, mutation screens and genotyping. Articles range in scope and depth from the introductory level to specific details of protocols and analyses, encompassing bacterial, fungal, plant, animal and human data. The editorial board welcome the submission of review articles for publication. Essential criteria for the publication of papers is that they do not contain primary data, and that they are high quality, clearly written review articles which provide a balanced, highly informative and up to date perspective to researchers in the field of functional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信