Comparing Confidence in Institutions Among Latino and White Catholics and Evangelicals: Exploring Religious Differences.

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Esmeralda Sánchez Salazar, Esther Chan, Sharan Kaur Mehta
{"title":"Comparing Confidence in Institutions Among Latino and White Catholics and Evangelicals: Exploring Religious Differences.","authors":"Esmeralda Sánchez Salazar, Esther Chan, Sharan Kaur Mehta","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent surveys reveal declines in the U.S. public's confidence in different institutions. Although some studies link these declines to religious factors, few disaggregate these patterns across racial and ethnic groups. Here, we focus on Latinos-a growing segment of the U.S. population and an increasingly religiously diverse part of the electorate. Using original, nationally representative survey data (N=4,321), we compare Latino evangelicals and Catholics to their white counterparts in their confidence in five institutions (religious organizations, higher education, the scientific community, Congress, and the press). We find that Latino and white Catholics consistently show high levels of confidence across institutions relative to white evangelicals. Our findings suggest that there may be more similarities in institutional confidence among those of different racial and ethnic groups who share a similar religious tradition than those who are of the same race or ethnicity but share different religious traditions. Patterns observed highlight the importance of examining institutional confidence through an intersectional lens that considers religious diversity <i>within</i> and <i>across</i> racial and ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48307,"journal":{"name":"Social Problems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spae066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent surveys reveal declines in the U.S. public's confidence in different institutions. Although some studies link these declines to religious factors, few disaggregate these patterns across racial and ethnic groups. Here, we focus on Latinos-a growing segment of the U.S. population and an increasingly religiously diverse part of the electorate. Using original, nationally representative survey data (N=4,321), we compare Latino evangelicals and Catholics to their white counterparts in their confidence in five institutions (religious organizations, higher education, the scientific community, Congress, and the press). We find that Latino and white Catholics consistently show high levels of confidence across institutions relative to white evangelicals. Our findings suggest that there may be more similarities in institutional confidence among those of different racial and ethnic groups who share a similar religious tradition than those who are of the same race or ethnicity but share different religious traditions. Patterns observed highlight the importance of examining institutional confidence through an intersectional lens that considers religious diversity within and across racial and ethnic groups.

比较拉丁裔和白人天主教徒和福音派教徒对机构的信心:探索宗教差异。
最近的调查显示,美国公众对不同机构的信心有所下降。尽管一些研究将这些下降与宗教因素联系起来,但很少有研究将这些模式分解为种族和民族群体。在这里,我们关注的是拉丁美洲人——美国人口中不断增长的一部分,也是选民中宗教信仰日益多样化的一部分。使用原始的,具有全国代表性的调查数据(N=4,321),我们比较了拉丁裔福音派和天主教徒与白人对五个机构(宗教组织,高等教育,科学界,国会和新闻界)的信心。我们发现,拉丁裔和白人天主教徒在各机构中始终表现出相对于白人福音派教徒的高水平的信心。我们的研究结果表明,在具有相似宗教传统的不同种族和民族群体中,机构信心可能比具有相同种族或民族但具有不同宗教传统的人更相似。观察到的模式强调了通过考虑种族和族裔群体内部和之间的宗教多样性的交叉视角来审查机构信心的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Problems
Social Problems SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Social Problems brings to the fore influential sociological findings and theories that have the ability to help us both better understand--and better deal with--our complex social environment. Some of the areas covered by the journal include: •Conflict, Social Action, and Change •Crime and Juvenile Delinquency •Drinking and Drugs •Health, Health Policy, and Health Services •Mental Health •Poverty, Class, and Inequality •Racial and Ethnic Minorities •Sexual Behavior, Politics, and Communities •Youth, Aging, and the Life Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信