School participation in a health behavior program: qualitative perspectives from schools that did and did not adopt the iAmHealthy program.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bethany Forseth, Jordan Carlson, Brittany Lancaster, Anna S Trofimoff, Karynn Glover, Katherine R Hendel, Galen Hoft, Ann M Davis
{"title":"School participation in a health behavior program: qualitative perspectives from schools that did and did not adopt the iAmHealthy program.","authors":"Bethany Forseth, Jordan Carlson, Brittany Lancaster, Anna S Trofimoff, Karynn Glover, Katherine R Hendel, Galen Hoft, Ann M Davis","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood overweight/obesity in rural areas is a public health concern. Schools provide access to youth/families for health behavior programming but have adoption challenges.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore school adoption of a family-based behavioral obesity program (iAmHealthy) from the perspective of three groups: (i) schools adopting iAmHealthy (\"adopters\"; took part in the iAmHealthy program), (ii) schools failing to adopt iAmHealthy (\"initial adopters\"; initially signed up for the iAmHealthy program, but could not continue), and (iii) schools that did not adopt iAmHealthy (\"non-adopters\"; never signed up for the iAmHealthy program).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural school representatives (N = 33; n = 12 adopters, n = 9 initial adopters, and n = 12 non-adopters). Interviews were analyzed thematically and aligned with constructs and domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged: (i) Regardless of the extent of healthy lifestyle programming schools offered, iAmHealthy would not compete and would benefit families, (ii) School representatives perceived a varied need for healthy behavior programming but challenges regarding limited resources were widespread, (iii) Partially due to concerns about stigma, school representatives preferred school-wide approaches that included integration with the curriculum and the community, (iv) School representatives considered many factors when deciding to participate in a health behavior program, and (v) School representatives expressed concerns about health behavior programming not being a priority for families. CFIR constructs within the domains of innovation, inner setting, outer setting, and individual characteristics aligned with the themes. Specifically, commonly cited barriers often aligned with the CFIR constructs of relative priority and local attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate health behavior programming would fill an unmet need, but that there are adoption barriers, including limited resources, weight-related stigmatization concerns, and differing priorities across schools, communities, and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childhood overweight/obesity in rural areas is a public health concern. Schools provide access to youth/families for health behavior programming but have adoption challenges.

Purpose: To explore school adoption of a family-based behavioral obesity program (iAmHealthy) from the perspective of three groups: (i) schools adopting iAmHealthy ("adopters"; took part in the iAmHealthy program), (ii) schools failing to adopt iAmHealthy ("initial adopters"; initially signed up for the iAmHealthy program, but could not continue), and (iii) schools that did not adopt iAmHealthy ("non-adopters"; never signed up for the iAmHealthy program).

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural school representatives (N = 33; n = 12 adopters, n = 9 initial adopters, and n = 12 non-adopters). Interviews were analyzed thematically and aligned with constructs and domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Five themes emerged: (i) Regardless of the extent of healthy lifestyle programming schools offered, iAmHealthy would not compete and would benefit families, (ii) School representatives perceived a varied need for healthy behavior programming but challenges regarding limited resources were widespread, (iii) Partially due to concerns about stigma, school representatives preferred school-wide approaches that included integration with the curriculum and the community, (iv) School representatives considered many factors when deciding to participate in a health behavior program, and (v) School representatives expressed concerns about health behavior programming not being a priority for families. CFIR constructs within the domains of innovation, inner setting, outer setting, and individual characteristics aligned with the themes. Specifically, commonly cited barriers often aligned with the CFIR constructs of relative priority and local attitudes.

Conclusion: Findings indicate health behavior programming would fill an unmet need, but that there are adoption barriers, including limited resources, weight-related stigmatization concerns, and differing priorities across schools, communities, and families.

学校参与健康行为项目:采用和未采用iAmHealthy项目的学校的定性观点。
背景:农村儿童超重/肥胖是一个公共卫生问题。学校为青少年/家庭提供健康行为规划的机会,但在采用方面存在挑战。目的:从三个群体的角度探讨学校采用基于家庭的行为肥胖计划(iAmHealthy):(i)采用iAmHealthy的学校(“采用者”);(ii)未采用iAmHealthy的学校(“最初采用者”;最初注册了iAmHealthy计划,但无法继续),以及(iii)未采用iAmHealthy计划的学校(“非采用者”;从未注册过iamhealth计划)。方法:对农村学校代表进行半结构化访谈(N = 33;N = 12个采用者,N = 9个初始采用者,N = 12个非采用者)。访谈按主题进行分析,并与来自实施研究统一框架(CFIR)的结构和领域保持一致。结果:出现了五个主题:(一)无论学校提供的健康生活方式规划的程度如何,“健康家庭”都不会与之竞争,而且会使家庭受益;(二)学校代表认为健康行为规划的需求多种多样,但资源有限的挑战普遍存在;(三)部分由于担心污名,学校代表更倾向于全校范围的方法,包括与课程和社区相结合;(四)学校代表在决定参加健康行为方案时考虑了许多因素,(五)学校代表对健康行为方案不是家庭的优先事项表示关切。CFIR在创新、内部环境、外部环境和与主题一致的个人特征等领域进行构建。具体来说,通常提到的障碍通常与CFIR的相对优先级和当地态度结构一致。结论:研究结果表明,健康行为规划可以填补未满足的需求,但存在采用障碍,包括资源有限,与体重相关的污名化问题,以及学校,社区和家庭之间的不同优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信