Utility and Safety of Compressed Air in Preventing Grain Entrapment.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniel Gaither, Mian Muhammad Sajid Raza, Mei Tessum, Andrew N Miller, Salah F Issa
{"title":"Utility and Safety of Compressed Air in Preventing Grain Entrapment.","authors":"Daniel Gaither, Mian Muhammad Sajid Raza, Mei Tessum, Andrew N Miller, Salah F Issa","doi":"10.13031/jash.16210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Compressed air strategy was evaluated as a grain entrapment prevention method. Nozzle types affected compressed air efficiency. Open ½ inch nozzles performed best. Mid-scale experiment confirmed compressed air utility in breaking grain clumps. Dust, fungal, and noise levels exceeded maximum limits during operations, and PPE must be worn properly before using compressed air to break grain clumps.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Grain entrapment, a severe and often fatal agricultural hazard, continues to pose a significant challenge in grain storage and handling. These incidents are often due to out-of-condition grain blocking outlets, leading to workers frequently entering the grain bin to dislodge grain. This study evaluates the utility of compressed air as a preventive measure to break up grain clumps located at bin outlets by conducting pilot and full-scale experiments using an air compressor. This study also evaluated potential hazards due to the use of air compressors. Three nozzle types were tested: open ½ inch, Crimped ½ inch, and the AirSpade. The findings indicated that the open ½ inch nozzle was the most efficient, with an average clearing time of 15 minutes per run, outperforming the crimped and AirSpade nozzles. Noise levels during operation ranged up to 105 dBA, with dust and fungal spore concentrations exceeding safety limits inside the grain bins and returning to acceptable levels shortly after operation. Full-scale testing indicates that compressed air can be useful in unclogging bins. The study underscores the potential of compressed air to enhance grain handling safety, offering practical safety recommendations and suggesting the need for further research to optimize and standardize its use in preventing grain entrapment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"31 3","pages":"269-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.16210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: Compressed air strategy was evaluated as a grain entrapment prevention method. Nozzle types affected compressed air efficiency. Open ½ inch nozzles performed best. Mid-scale experiment confirmed compressed air utility in breaking grain clumps. Dust, fungal, and noise levels exceeded maximum limits during operations, and PPE must be worn properly before using compressed air to break grain clumps.

Abstract: Grain entrapment, a severe and often fatal agricultural hazard, continues to pose a significant challenge in grain storage and handling. These incidents are often due to out-of-condition grain blocking outlets, leading to workers frequently entering the grain bin to dislodge grain. This study evaluates the utility of compressed air as a preventive measure to break up grain clumps located at bin outlets by conducting pilot and full-scale experiments using an air compressor. This study also evaluated potential hazards due to the use of air compressors. Three nozzle types were tested: open ½ inch, Crimped ½ inch, and the AirSpade. The findings indicated that the open ½ inch nozzle was the most efficient, with an average clearing time of 15 minutes per run, outperforming the crimped and AirSpade nozzles. Noise levels during operation ranged up to 105 dBA, with dust and fungal spore concentrations exceeding safety limits inside the grain bins and returning to acceptable levels shortly after operation. Full-scale testing indicates that compressed air can be useful in unclogging bins. The study underscores the potential of compressed air to enhance grain handling safety, offering practical safety recommendations and suggesting the need for further research to optimize and standardize its use in preventing grain entrapment.

压缩空气在防止粮食滞留中的效用和安全性。
重点:压缩空气策略被评价为一种防止谷物滞留的方法。喷嘴类型影响压缩空气效率。开放的1 / 2英寸喷嘴效果最好。中等规模的实验证实了压缩空气在破碎颗粒团块中的作用。在操作过程中,粉尘、真菌和噪音水平超过了最大限制,在使用压缩空气破碎颗粒团块之前,必须正确佩戴PPE。摘要:粮食滞留是一种严重的农业灾害,对粮食的储存和处理构成了巨大的挑战。这些事件通常是由于粮食状况不佳堵塞了出口,导致工人经常进入粮仓取出粮食。本研究通过使用空气压缩机进行试点和全面实验,评估压缩空气作为一种预防措施的效用,以打破位于料仓出口的颗粒团块。这项研究还评估了使用空气压缩机的潜在危害。测试了三种喷嘴类型:开放式½英寸,卷曲½英寸和AirSpade。研究结果表明,开放式1 / 2英寸喷嘴效率最高,每次作业平均清理时间为15分钟,优于卷曲喷嘴和AirSpade喷嘴。操作过程中的噪音水平高达105 dBA,谷物仓内的灰尘和真菌孢子浓度超过安全限制,并在操作后不久恢复到可接受的水平。全面测试表明,压缩空气可用于疏通垃圾箱。该研究强调了压缩空气在提高粮食处理安全性方面的潜力,提供了实用的安全建议,并建议需要进一步研究以优化和规范其在防止粮食滞留方面的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信