Combustibility Determination for Walnut Hulling and Shelling Facility Dusts.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Derek P Whitelock, Jaya Shankar Tumuluru, Carlos B Armijo
{"title":"Combustibility Determination for Walnut Hulling and Shelling Facility Dusts.","authors":"Derek P Whitelock, Jaya Shankar Tumuluru, Carlos B Armijo","doi":"10.13031/jash.16193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Walnut dust is listed as combustible by OSHA. This designation could trigger requirements for walnut hullers and shellers to install expensive sprinkler systems and approved dust control systems. Recognized standard combustible dust screening tests showed that walnut huller and sheller dusts were not flammable solids and should not be considered combustible.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Fires and explosions at agricultural facilities have been an issue across the world. While some agricultural industries like sugar and grain handling facilities have had issues with fires or explosions and have been subject to regulations on dusts for many years, many other agricultural processors have not. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lists walnut dust as combustible. Some local governments and insurance companies have attempted to apply that designation to dust at walnut huller and sheller facilities. Facilities that generate potentially combustible dusts must abide by National Fire Protection Association standards that require expensive sprinkler systems and approved dust control systems and may have difficulties obtaining approval for building permits and insurance coverage. Tests following United Nations Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Subsection 33.2.1, Test N.1, \"Test Method for Flammable Solids\" were conducted to determine the combustibility of dust samples collected at walnut hulling and shelling facilities in California. According to these tests following the UN method, the walnut huller and sheller dusts were not flammable solids and therefore should not be considered combustible dusts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"31 3","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.16193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: Walnut dust is listed as combustible by OSHA. This designation could trigger requirements for walnut hullers and shellers to install expensive sprinkler systems and approved dust control systems. Recognized standard combustible dust screening tests showed that walnut huller and sheller dusts were not flammable solids and should not be considered combustible.

Abstract: Fires and explosions at agricultural facilities have been an issue across the world. While some agricultural industries like sugar and grain handling facilities have had issues with fires or explosions and have been subject to regulations on dusts for many years, many other agricultural processors have not. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lists walnut dust as combustible. Some local governments and insurance companies have attempted to apply that designation to dust at walnut huller and sheller facilities. Facilities that generate potentially combustible dusts must abide by National Fire Protection Association standards that require expensive sprinkler systems and approved dust control systems and may have difficulties obtaining approval for building permits and insurance coverage. Tests following United Nations Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Subsection 33.2.1, Test N.1, "Test Method for Flammable Solids" were conducted to determine the combustibility of dust samples collected at walnut hulling and shelling facilities in California. According to these tests following the UN method, the walnut huller and sheller dusts were not flammable solids and therefore should not be considered combustible dusts.

核桃脱壳和脱壳设备粉尘的可燃性测定。
重点:核桃粉尘被OSHA列为可燃物质。这一指定可能引发要求核桃脱壳机和脱壳机安装昂贵的洒水系统和经批准的粉尘控制系统。公认的标准可燃粉尘筛选试验表明,核桃壳和壳粉尘不是可燃固体,不应被视为可燃。摘要:农业设施的火灾和爆炸一直是一个世界性的问题。虽然一些农业行业,如制糖和谷物处理设施,存在火灾或爆炸问题,并且多年来一直受到粉尘法规的约束,但许多其他农业加工商却没有。美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)将核桃粉尘列为可燃物。一些地方政府和保险公司试图将这一规定适用于核桃脱壳和去壳设施的粉尘。产生潜在可燃粉尘的设施必须遵守国家消防协会的标准,这些标准需要昂贵的喷水灭火系统和经批准的粉尘控制系统,并且可能难以获得建筑许可证和保险的批准。按照《联合国试验和标准手册》第三部分第33.2.1节试验N.1, “可燃固体试验方法”进行了试验,以确定在加利福尼亚核桃去壳和去壳设施收集的粉尘样品的可燃性。根据这些测试遵循联合国方法,核桃壳和壳粉尘不是可燃固体,因此不应被视为可燃粉尘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信